Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wood Dock Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$233k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$711kEducation$657kHealth$104kFood & Nutrition$56kEnvironment$50kAnimals$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kPhilanthropy$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $216k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$64k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK$40,000
Individual grant recipient$36,000
HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE$25,000
HUDSON VALLEY FILM COMMISSION$20,000
ARTS SOCIETY OF KINGSTON$20,000
WOODSTOCK SCHOOL OF ART$20,000
HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER$15,000
HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WOODSTOCK$10,000
PHOTOWORK FOUNDATION$10,000
SUNY NEW PALTZ FOUNDATION$10,000
WOODSTOCK MEMORIAL SOCIETY$10,000
UPSTATE FILMS$8,000
DIAZ MEMORIAL AMBULANCE SERVICE$3,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS-SAUGERTIES$2,500
WOODSTOCK FARM FESTIVAL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UPSTATE FILMS: $80k → 9%REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $28k → 14%ARTS SOCIETY OF KINGSTON: $40k → 16%SYDA FOUNDATION: $75k → 16%PRATT INSTITUTE: $100k → 20%LEMUR CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%LEE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 7%HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%UPSTATE FILMS: $50k → 9%UNITED WAY: $30k → 16%SYDA FOUNDATION: $74k → 16%PRATT INSTITUTE: $100k → 20%LEMUR CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%LEE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 7%HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%UPSTATE FILMS: $25k → 9%ARTS SOCIETY OF KINGSTON: $20k → 16%PRATT INSTITUTE: $100k → 20%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 7%HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%UPSTATE FILMS: $20k → 9%ARTS SOCIETY OF KINGSTON: $20k → 16%PRATT INSTITUTE: $50k → 20%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 7%HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER: $25k → 9%WOODSTOCK BYRDCLIFFE GUILD: $537k → 16%WOODSTOCK BYRDCLIFFE GUILD: $135k → 16%WOODSTOCK BYRDCLIFFE GUILD: $80k → 16%WOODSTOCK BYRDCLIFFE GUILD: $65k → 16%HUDSON VALLEY FILM COMMISSION: $40k → 16%HUDSON VALLEY FILM COMMISSION: $40k → 16%CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK: $40k → 16%WOODSTOCK BYRDCLIFFE GUILD: $36k → 16%WOODSTOCK BYRDCLIFFE GUILD: $32k → 16%HUDSON VALLEY FILM COMMISSION: $30k → 16%HUDSON VALLEY FILM COMMISSION: $30k → 16%WOODSTOCK MEMORIAL SOCIETY: $30k → 16%WOODSTOCK FIRE DEPARTMENT 1: $27k → 16%CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK: $25k → 16%CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK: $25k → 16%HUDSON VALLEY FILM COMMISSION: $20k → 16%WOODSTOCK SCHOOL OF ART: $20k → 16%OPUS 40: $25k → 16%RAISING YOUR AWARENESS ABOUT NARCOTICS (RYAN): $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
CT
CA
CO
HI
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 23 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
25

Total granted

$2.5M
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+3%

Still filing today

74%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyScience & TechFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PRATT INSTITUTE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $354k · revenue +28%
  • UF
    UPSTATE FILMS LTD
    5× · 2021–2025 · $183k · revenue +303%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • WF
    WOODSTOCK FIRE DEPARTMENT 1
    one grant, 2019 · $27k
  • RY
    RAISING YOUR AWARENESS ABOUT NARCOTICS
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arts Letters and Numbers
Arts & Culture
2
Hudson River Museum of Westchester

Situated on the banks of the hudson river in yonkers, new york, the hudson river museum's mission is to engage, inspire, and connect diverse communities through the power of the arts, sciences, and history.

Arts & Culture
3
Hudson Valley Center for Comp Art

The Organization s mission is the development and presentation of new art exhibits and programs.

Arts & Culture
4
Constance Saltonstall Foundation for the Arts Inc
Unclassified
5
New York Studio School

The new york studio school is committed to giving a significant education to the aspiring artist, a preamble to a lifetime's engagement in drawing, painting, and sculpture. (see schedule o for continuation)

—
6
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
7
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
8
Dutchess County Art Association Inc

To foster and perpetuate appreciation of the visual arts

—
9
The Long Island Museum of American Art History & Carriages

The long island museum is dedicated to inspiring people of all ages with an understanding and enjoyment of american art, history and carriages as expressed through the heritage of long island and its diverse communities.

Arts & Culture
10
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
11
New York School of the Arts Inc

New york school of the arts, inc. is a school offering courses and specialized workshops in painting, drawing, sculpture,printmaking,art theory and other subjects.

Education
12
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Woodstock Film Festival Inc; the most unlike its peers is Calvert Vaux Preservation Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
17/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $884,676 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHUDSON VALLEY FILM COMMISSION INC: $180,000 · OtherHUDSON VALLEY FILM COMMISSION INCSYDA FOUNDATION: $149,000 · OtherSYDA FOUNDATION+29 more: $304,400 · Other+29 morePRATT INSTITUTE: $353,800 · EducationPRATT INSTITUTEHIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $125,000 · EducationHIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE I…WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITYWOODSTOCK DAY SCHOOL: $35,000 · EducationWOODSTOCK DAY SCHOOL+1 more: $15,000 · EducationUPSTATE FILMS LTD: $183,000 · Arts & CultureUPSTATE FILMS LTDCENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK: $100,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR PHOTOG…Arts Society of Kingston Inc: $80,000 · Arts & CultureArts Society of K…WOODSTOCK FILM FESTIVAL INC: $32,000 · Arts & CultureWOODSTOCK FILM FE…WOODSTOCK SCHOOL OF ART INC: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $20,000 · Arts & CultureLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · PhilanthropyPhotowork Foundation: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyLemur Conservation Foundation Inc: $50,000 · Science & TechWOODSTOCK MEMORIAL SOCIETY: $40,000 · Membership BenefitHUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC: $40,000 · Environment
Other$1,518,076Education$628,800Arts & Culture$435,000Philanthropy$70,500Science & Tech$50,000Membership Benefit$40,000Environment$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRATT INSTITUTE: $353,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUPSTATE FILMS LTD: $183,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetHUDSON VALLEY FILM COMMISSION INC: $180,000 over 6y, 36% of budgetHIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY AT WOODSTOCK: $100,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetArts Society of Kingston Inc: $80,000 over 3y, 36% of budgetLemur Conservation Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetWOODSTOCK MEMORIAL SOCIETY: $40,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetHUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC: $40,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $37,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOODSTOCK DAY SCHOOL: $35,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWOODSTOCK FILM FESTIVAL INC: $32,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetOPUS 40 INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSUNY NEW PALTZ FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WOODSTOCK: $16,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetNEWARK ACADEMY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMT MARION FIRE COMPANY: $12,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetKAUPO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPhotowork Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetBARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Spectrum Services: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIAZ MEMORIAL AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCreative Music Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWOODSTOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND ARTS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 37% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kvistad FoundationNY30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kvistad Foundation · Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Ulster Savings Charitable Foundation · Douglas C James Charitable Trust · Ibm International Foundation · The Thompson Family Foundation Inc · Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation · Novo Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Villchur Foundation · Jonathan Starr Foundation Inc Nielsen · The Jedra Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wood Dock Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wood Dock Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wood Dock Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Wood Dock Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wood Dock’s filings →

More from the funding graph