· Public charity
Women's Fund of Hawai'I
To support programs that empower women and girls in hawaii.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $133,656 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $148,656 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE GROWING OHANA | $10,000 |
| DYNAMIC HEALING CENTER | $10,000 |
| MOLOKAI AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| EVERMORE (HAWAII CHAPTER) | $10,000 |
| MANA WAHINE PRODUCTIONS | $10,000 |
| WISDOM CIRCLES OCEANIA | $10,000 |
| WAHINE FREELANCE ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| HE HO'OMAKA HOU ANA O PUNA | $10,000 |
| MAUI FARMER NETWORK | $10,000 |
| HULA PRESERVATION SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| AHA KUKUI O MOLOKAI | $9,416 |
| ALA HAWAII GIRLS STATE FOUNDATION | $7,000 |
| HONPA HONGWANJI HAWAII BETSUIN | $6,000 |
| AERIAL ARTS HAWAII LLC | $5,800 |
| WOMEN SPEAK OUT | $5,440 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WCWISDOM CIRCLES OCEANIA2× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +205%
- GHGOING HOME HAWAII2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +105%
- MNMALAMA NA MAKUA A KEIKI INC2× · 2020–2023 · $18k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- V5VARIOUS 5000 OR LESSone grant, 2019 · $100k
- HMHEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION OF HAWAIIgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $23k · revenue +195%
- PBPACIFIC BIRTH COLLECTIVE INCORPORATEDone grant, 2023 · $21k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To assist victims of domestic violence to attain safety, peace and healing through a continuum of services through its partners and collaborators in the community
Nonprofit dedicated to community education and culture.
to rehabilitate, curate, and steward the natural and cultural resources of Kawa to honor the past, benefit the present, and preserve for the future generations of Ka'u, the Island of Hawaii and all humankind.
Ho`omau ke ola provides comprehensive rehabilitation services including residential and outpatient care, treatment, and counseling to persons recovering from problems related to persons with mental and substance abuse disorders. ho`omau ke…
To provide "culturally-minded evidenced-based behavioral health care that is responsive to the needs of the medically underserved, predominantly native hawaiian, and rural communities. the organization provides behavioral health services…
Ohana makame inc is a behavioral health agency whose mission is to provide counseling and other related resources to the residents of east maui.
Ka hale pomaika'i seeks to offer culturally respectful, sober support services including community education, relapse prevention, and sober housing to adults in early recovery from addiction on the island of moloka'i.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Malama Na Makua a Keiki Inc and the most unlike its peers is Women Speaking Out. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 19% of your grantees by number, and just 18% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC BIRTH COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT ↗
- Who funds WISDOM CIRCLES OCEANIA ↗
- Who funds MOLOKAI AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds GOING HOME HAWAII ↗
- Who funds MALAMA NA MAKUA A KEIKI INC ↗
- Who funds Women in Need ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER HAWAII ↗
- Who funds MALAMA PONO HEALTH SERVICES FKA MALAMA PONO-KAUAI AIDS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ALOHA DIAPER BANK ↗
- Who funds Dreamhouse Inc ↗
- Who funds WAHINE FREELANCE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Maui Farmer Support Network ↗
- Who funds Kukolu ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds Live-Evermore Inc ↗
- Who funds ADULT FRIENDS FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds HAWAII FRIENDS OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC SURVIVOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds HAWAII STATE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds Pouhana O Na Wahine ↗
- Who funds KHM INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MANA MAOLI ↗
- Who funds HOAKA MANA ↗
- Who funds HANA ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEGAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds KALAUOKEKAHULI ↗
- Who funds MA KA HANA KA IKE BUILDING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds WORKNET INC ↗
- Who funds HULA PRESERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PURPLE MAIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE SERVICES HAWAII INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Atherton Family Foundation · Friends of Hawaii Charities Inc · Aloha United Way Inc · McInerny Foundation-- · Cooke Foundation Limited · J Watumull Fund · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Kosasa Foundation · Central Pacific Bank Foundation · Hmsa Foundation · The People's Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Women's Fund of Hawai'I funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.