Loading…
· Public charity
2ND CHANCE MS
2ND CHANCE MS will raise awareness and funds for adult education and work skill training.
$85k
Granted FY2021
5
Grants
1
Communities
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of 2ND CHANCE MS’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2021 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$538k
Total assets
Largest grants
- JONES JUNIOR COLLEGE$25,000
- MISSISSIPPI DELTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$18,750
- COPIAH-LINCOLN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$15,000
- ITAWAMBA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$12,500
- EAST MISSISSIPPI COMMUNITY COLLEGE$10,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 25% — the area typically sits at 19%. 78% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Southwest Mississippi Community
The foundation is an auxilary organization of southwest ms community college and administers scholarships to both students and faculty members and raises funds to supplement different areas of the entire college.
Education
2
Wilson Community College Foundation
Promote the general welfare of the college by awarding scholarships and tuition assitance to students. promoting program awareness and community engagement and providing support to faculty and staff.
—
3
Mclennan Community College Foundation
The mcc foundation's mission supports the development of funds for student scholarships, staff and faculty professional development, campus capital projects and student emergency needs.
Education
4
Madisonville College Foundation
Education
5
Colorado Northwestern Community College Foundation
Provide funding for scholarships and improvement projects for colorado northwestern community college
—
6
North Central State College Foundation
The mission of the North Central State Foundation is to assist the College in providing life long learning opportunities by securing financial and community support.
—
7
Snead State Community College Foundation
International
8
Cuyahoga Community College Foundation
The mission of the cuyahoga community college foundation is (continued on schedule o)to provide resources for advancing student success at cuyahoga community college and to transform the lives of those tri-c serves. our vision is to ensure…
Education
9
Clovis Community College Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Northeast Alabama Community College
The foundation's mission is to raise funds for use at northeast alabama community college through student scholarships and various other college projects.
Education
11
The Vance-Granville Community College
Vance-Granville Community College Foundation, Inc., purpose is to receive contributions and to use such contributions to provide funds to Vance-Granville Community College to be used to acquire or purchase real or personal property, to pay…
—
12
Lamar Community College Foundation
To solicit and provide funds for scholarships, program development, capital construction, and other opportunities to serve lamar community college, its communities, and approximately 1,000 on-campus, concurrent enrollment, and online…
Philanthropy
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Delta Community College and the most unlike its peers is Lafayette County Literacy Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$209,057Education$18,750Philanthropy$5,250
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Mississippi Community College FoundationMS22.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Mississippi Community College Foundation · Women's Foundation of Mississippi · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Foundation for the Mid South Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation 2ND CHANCE MS funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MISSISSIPPI DELTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~29 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +95% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 640776389 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on MISSISSIPPI DELTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 29 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to 2nd Chance Ms?
Find your warmest path to 2nd Chance Ms through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines