Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wollman Scholarship Fund

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2026still arriving
9
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2026.

Education$77k
02FY2026 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$173k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TN AT KNOXVILLE$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI$1,000
TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
MOTLOW STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,000
ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA$1,000
MILLIGAN UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT MARTIN$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOTLOW STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TN AT KNOXVILLE: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA: $1k → 12%LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT MARTIN: $1k → 18%MILLIGAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI: $1k → 22%ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 16 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2026, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
13

Total granted

$59k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+4%

Still filing today

38%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $5k · revenue +14%
  • LU
    LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +20%
  • LU
    LEE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • MT
    MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • LU
    LIFE UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +4%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
3
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
4
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
5
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
6
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
7
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
8
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
9
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
10
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
11
Lourdes University

Lourdes university, rooted in catholic and franciscan traditions, provides a values-centered education that enriches lives and advances academic excellence through the integration of the liberal arts and professional studies.

Education
12
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of the South; the most unlike its peers is Life University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $9,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEETENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherTENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLEUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGAUNIVERSITY OF LEEDS: $3,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LEEDSLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · OtherLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF TENESSEE AT MARTIN: $3,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TENESSEE AT MARTINUNIVERSITY OF TENNEESSEE - KNOXVILLE: $2,000 · OtherLEE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI: $2,000 · OtherMIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · OtherMOTLOW STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2,000 · OtherEAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TN AT KNOXVILLE: $2,000 · Other+10 more: $9,000 · Other+10 moreVanderbilt University: $7,000 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityTREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationTREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITYSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $2,000 · EducationSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INCMILLIGAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationMILLIGAN UNIVERSITYLIFE UNIVERSITY INC: $1,500 · EducationLIFE UNIVERSITY INCMARYVILLE COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $1,000 · EducationNova Southeastern University Inc: $1,000 · Education
Other$56,000Education$20,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVanderbilt University: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILLIGAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE UNIVERSITY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARYVILLE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LEE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MILLIGAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIFE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYVILLE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ↗
  • Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Folds of Honor FoundationOK15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Folds of Honor Foundation · Cv Maybelle and John I Holland Scholarship · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Lilly Endowment Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wollman Scholarship Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wollman Scholarship Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Southeastern University Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wollman Scholarship Fund?

Find your warmest path to Wollman Scholarship Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wollman Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph