Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wm E Slaughter Jr Foundationinc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$495kHealth$128kHuman Services$93kEnvironment$31kInternational$18kCommunity Improvement$11kReligion$10kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$787k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOKU LELE FOUNDATION$30,000
INSTITUTES FOR THE ACHIVMT OF HUM POTENTIAL$17,000
RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$13,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LANAI CAT SANCTURY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SEDONA RECYCLES$4,000
JEROME HUMANE SOCIETY$3,000
HARMONY WORKSHOP$1,500
THE SEVA FOUNDATION$1,500
CARAVAN TO CLASS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
OR
PA
CT
CA
UT
AZ
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$782k · 16 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against -55% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$782k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
-55%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $91k · revenue +78%
  • PI
    PARROTS IN PARADISE
    5× · 2019–2023 · $38k · revenue +97%
  • LC
    LANAI CAT SANCTUARY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $32k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • TL
    TEN LIVES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • Foothills Food Bankgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +117%
  • FC
    FOOTHILLS CARING CORP
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Borrego Animal Rescue

Improve conditions, and provide care for all the cats

Animals
2
Golden Ark

homeless animal shelter

Animals
3
PurrHarmony Inc

Rescue and shelter cats

Animals
4
Zen Animal Rescue

Dog Rescue

—
5
Cocoa Kitties

Animal rescue

Animals
6
Save the Cats Arizona

No-kill, cage free cat sanctuary with adoption

Animals
7
A Better Life

Rescue animals

Animals
8
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
9
Cat Tail Farms Feline Sanctuary

Animal rescue and housing

Animals
10
Erin Regan Animal Sanctuary

To rescue homeless dogs and cats

Animals
11
Purrfect Friends Cat Rescue

Cat Rescue

Animals
12
Saint Francis Animal Sanctuary

Animal Sanctuary

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lanai Cat Sanctuary; the most unlike its peers is Parrots in Paradise. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOKU LELE FOUNDATION: $289,000 · OtherHOKU LELE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $73,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $34,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+9 more: $47,500 · Other+9 moreTHE INSTITUTES FOR THE ACHIEVEMENT OF HUMAN POTENTIAL: $119,000 · HealthTHE INSTITUTES F…PARROTS IN PARADISE: $38,000 · AnimalsPARROTS IN PA…LANAI CAT SANCTUARY: $32,000 · AnimalsLANAI CAT SAN…JEROME HUMANE SOCIETY JHS: $24,000 · AnimalsJEROME HUMANE…RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $91,000 · Human ServicesRANCHO FELIZ…SEDONA RECYCLES INC: $27,000 · EnvironmentSEVA FOUNDATION: $10,500 · InternationalCaravan to Class: $7,000 · PhilanthropyDANNS HOUSE: $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$443,500Health$119,000Animals$94,000Human Services$91,000Environment$27,000International$10,500Philanthropy$7,000Housing & Shelter$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE INSTITUTES FOR THE ACHIEVEMENT OF HUMAN POTENTIAL: $119,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetRANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $91,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetPARROTS IN PARADISE: $38,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetLANAI CAT SANCTUARY: $32,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSEDONA RECYCLES INC: $27,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetJEROME HUMANE SOCIETY JHS: $24,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetSEVA FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCaravan to Class: $7,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFoothills Food Bank: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDANNS HOUSE: $2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE INSTITUTES FOR THE ACHIEVEMENT OF HUMAN POTENTIAL ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARROTS IN PARADISE ↗
  • Who funds LANAI CAT SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds SEDONA RECYCLES INC ↗
  • Who funds JEROME HUMANE SOCIETY JHS ↗
  • Who funds SEVA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Caravan to Class ↗
  • Who funds TEN LIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Foothills Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds DANNS HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wm E Slaughter Jr Foundationinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wm E Slaughter Jr Foundationinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wm E Slaughter Jr Foundationinc?

    Find your warmest path to Wm E Slaughter Jr Foundationinc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wm E Slaughter Jr Foundationinc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph