Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wise Street Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2020
8
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Human Services$39kHousing & Shelter$32kHealth$23kReligion$21kFood & Nutrition$13kPhilanthropy$11kInternational$10kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2020 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WALLINGFORD FAMILY YMCA$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$3,000
CHURCH OF THE MOST HOLY TRINITY$3,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC$2,947
CT FOOD BANK$2,000
MASTER'S MANNA$2,000
GIRLS ON THE RUN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $1k → 9%WALLINGFORD FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 12%WALLINGFORD FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 12%WALLINGFORD FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 12%WALLINGFORD FAMILY YMCA: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OH
CT
CO
VA
TN
NC
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Wise Street Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Wise Street Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$123k · 15 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +153% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
17

Total granted

$123k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+153%
+47%

Still filing today

33%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $29k · revenue +262%
  • YO
    YMCA OF WALLINGFORD INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $18k · revenue +70%
  • NH
    NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $18k · revenue +360%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOPE FOR HAITIS CHILDREN
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +47%
  • WE
    WALLINGFORD EMERGENCY SHELTER
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
10
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
11
The Greater Detroit Health Transition Company

Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…

—
12
Children's National

Children's national coordinates the overall policy and activities of the affiliated organizations. see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $13,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INCCHURCH OF THE MOST HOLY TRINITY: $6,200 · OtherCHURCH OF THE MOST HOLY TRINITYTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $5,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN …HOPE FOR HAITIS CHILDREN: $5,000 · OtherHOPE FOR HAITIS CHILDRENWALLINGFORD EMERGENCY SHELTER: $3,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $3,000 · Other+18 more: $12,550 · Other+18 moreST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $29,000 · Housing & ShelterST MATTHEWS HOUSE IN…NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $17,947 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HE…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…+1 more: $325 · HealthYMCA OF WALLINGFORD INC: $18,375 · Human ServicesYMCA OF WALLI…FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesMaster's Manna Inc: $15,000 · Food & NutritionMaster's M…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC: $500 · International
Other$60,750Housing & Shelter$29,000Health$21,272Human Services$19,375Food & Nutrition$15,000Philanthropy$6,000International$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $29,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA OF WALLINGFORD INC: $18,375 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $17,947 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMaster's Manna Inc: $15,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL STROKE ASSOCIATION: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $325 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF WALLINGFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Master's Manna Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds BIKES FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL STROKE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds MDRC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wise Street Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wise Street Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Family & Children's Agency Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Jewish Federation of Greater New Haven Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wise Street’s filings →

More from the funding graph