Skip to content

· Public charity

Wisdom Inc

Wisdom works with congregation-based community organizations to create understanding and build relationships across boundaries, to train leaders, and to organize people to advocate for social change that is in accord with their values.

$380k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$1.5MPhilanthropy$15k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $297,681, the rows itemized in this filing. The $379,606 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $81,925 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $233k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MENIKANAEHKEM$65,000
RACINE INTERFAITH COALITION$40,000
JOSHUA$40,000
JONAH$27,000
MICAH$25,000
SOPHIA$25,000
ESTHER$20,000
CUSH$20,000
MOSES$20,000
FREE$15,681
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Kids Forward: $20k → 10%Kids Forward: $14k → 10%FREE: $16k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 15 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$1.5M
$44k

Still filing today

87%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesCrime & LegalReligionHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EO
    EXPO of Wisconsin Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $231k · revenue +41% · 31% of their budget
  • MI
    MILWAUKEE INNERCITY CONGREGATIONS ALLIED FOR HOPE INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $151k · revenue +9% · 36% of their budget
  • JI
    JONAH INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $129k · revenue +321%

Funded once

  • DA
    DEMOCRACY ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2021 · $44k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Empower Wisconsin Foundation Inc

Empower Wisconsin Foundation's mission is to educate both the public and leaders of grassroots initiatives on criminal justice reform, educational choice, limited government, freedom of speech, transparency in government and private…

—
2
Interfaith Strategy for Advocacy and Action in the Community

Isaac is a faith-based community organizing group made up of congregations and organizations that unite in order to accomplish what cannot be done as individuals or single congregations. together, we focus our collectively formed…

Religion
3
Just Food Initiative of the Fox Valley
Food & Nutrition
4
Wisconsin Faith Voices for Justice

The mission of wisconsin faith voices for justice is to connect and empower faith communities and individuals to work for the common good and a life of dignity for everyone. we advocate for change so that all individuals and families can…

Religion
5
Empower Wisconsin Inc

Empower Wisconsin, Inc. is a government watchdog whose primary purpose is to educate and mobilize activists to support reforms in areas like criminal justice, education, taxation and government regulation.

—
6
Wisconsin Justice Initiative Inc

To advocate for progressive change in the wisconsin justice system by educating the public about its real-life impacts and partnering with other organizations to achieve more just outcomes.

Crime & Legal
7
Isaiah

Isaiah is a state-wide coalition of congregations and allies. we are a vehicle for people of faith to work for racial and economic justice in minnesota.

Religion
8
Wisconsin Rural Womens Initiative Inc

We work to develop self-sustaining women's circles.

Health
9
Chicago Area Fair Housing Alliance

Cafha provides training and technical assistance to a wide array of stakeholders combating housing discrimination and promoting equitable place-based opportunity through education, advocacy, and collaborative action.

—
10
Stichting Womens Initiatives for Gender Justice

Ending impunity for conflict related sexual violence

International
11
Hola Inc
Human Services
12
Transformative Justice of Williamson County
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congregations United to Serve Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Free Movement Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JONAH INC: $129,397 · PhilanthropyJONAH INCESTHER INC: $99,879 · PhilanthropyESTHER INCJOSHUA: $95,411 · PhilanthropyJOSHUACONGREGATIONS UNITED TO SERVE HUMANITY INC: $83,741 · PhilanthropyCONGREGATIONS UNITED TO SERVE HUMAN…SOPHIA OF WAUKESHA INC: $55,065 · PhilanthropySOPHIA OF WAUKESHA INCWISDOM INC DBA NAOMI INC: $20,125 · PhilanthropyMENIKANAEHKEM INC: $206,602 · OtherMENIKANAEHKEM INCDEMOCRACY ALLIANCE: $43,630 · OtherDEMOCRACY ALLIANCEMOSES - WISDOM OF MADISON INC: $43,570 · OtherMOSES - WISDOM OF MADISO…WISCONSIN COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $37,600 · OtherWISCONSIN COUNCIL OF CHU…EXPO of Wisconsin Inc: $231,448 · Crime & LegalEXPO of Wisconsin…MILWAUKEE INNERCITY CONGREGATIONS ALLIED FOR HOPE INC: $151,139 · ReligionMILWAUKEE I…CITIZEN ACTION OF WISCONSIN EDUCATION FUND INC: $127,400 · Public BenefitCITIZEN A…EMBOLDEN WI INC: $77,000 · HealthRACINE INTERFAITH COALITION: $71,480 · EducationKIDS FORWARD INC: $34,400 · Human ServicesFREE MOVEMENT INCORPORATED: $15,681 · Human Services
Philanthropy$483,618Other$331,402Crime & Legal$231,448Religion$151,139Public Benefit$127,400Health$77,000Education$71,480Human Services$50,081

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEXPO of Wisconsin Inc: $231,448 over 3y, 31% of budgetMILWAUKEE INNERCITY CONGREGATIONS ALLIED FOR HOPE INC: $151,139 over 4y, 36% of budgetJONAH INC: $129,397 over 7y, 23% of budgetCITIZEN ACTION OF WISCONSIN EDUCATION FUND INC: $127,400 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetESTHER INC: $99,879 over 7y, 19% of budgetJOSHUA: $95,411 over 5y, 33% of budgetCONGREGATIONS UNITED TO SERVE HUMANITY INC: $83,741 over 6y, 37% of budgetEMBOLDEN WI INC: $77,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetRACINE INTERFAITH COALITION: $71,480 over 3y, 22% of budgetSOPHIA OF WAUKESHA INC: $55,065 over 4y, 34% of budgetMOSES - WISDOM OF MADISON INC: $43,570 over 3y, 15% of budgetKIDS FORWARD INC: $34,400 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWISDOM INC DBA NAOMI INC: $20,125 over 2y, 36% of budgetFREE MOVEMENT INCORPORATED: $15,681 over 1y, 4.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EXPO of Wisconsin Inc ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE INNERCITY CONGREGATIONS ALLIED FOR HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds JONAH INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZEN ACTION OF WISCONSIN EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ESTHER INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSHUA ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATIONS UNITED TO SERVE HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds EMBOLDEN WI INC ↗
  • Who funds RACINE INTERFAITH COALITION ↗
  • Who funds SOPHIA OF WAUKESHA INC ↗
  • Who funds MOSES - WISDOM OF MADISON INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS FORWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds WISDOM INC DBA NAOMI INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE MOVEMENT INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wisdom Action Network IncWI24.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 3 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wisdom Action Network Inc · Basic Needs Giving Partnership Inc · The Roots and Wings Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wisdom Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wisdom Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wisdom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph