Skip to content

California · Public charity

Wine Road Northern Sonoma Cnty Inc

The mission of the wine road is to increase awareness of alexander, dry creek and russian river valleys through education and marketing while promoting sonoma county as the year-round wine country

$14k
Granted FY2019
3
Grants FY2019
3
Organizations funded FY2019
67%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2019
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$13,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 5
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
2
Total assets, FY2019
$202k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 67% of the organizations Wine Road Northern Sonoma Cnty Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 8% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
Public Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesHealth
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20193$14k67%
FY20182$18k50%
FY20175$27kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Food & Nutrition$56kHealth$1kCivil Rights$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kHuman Services$350Housing & Shelter$250Education$100

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Wine Road Northern Sonoma Cnty Inc with peer funders

About Wine Road Northern Sonoma Cnty Inc

How much does Wine Road Northern Sonoma Cnty Inc give?
Wine Road Northern Sonoma Cnty Inc reported 3 grants totaling $14,100 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 5 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does Wine Road Northern Sonoma Cnty Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2019, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (94%), Health (2%), Civil Rights (2%).
Who are Wine Road Northern Sonoma Cnty Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2019: Redwood Empire Food Bank ($56k), Scopa Has a Dream Inc Dba Corazon Healdsburg ($1k), Healthcare Foundation Northern Sonoma County ($1k).
Does Wine Road Northern Sonoma Cnty Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Wine Road Northern Sonoma Cnty Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, Network for Good, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is Wine Road Northern Sonoma Cnty Inc based?
Wine Road Northern Sonoma Cnty Inc is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wine Road Northern Sonoma Cnty’s filings →

More from the funding graph