Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Windy Bay Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.9MPhilanthropy$209kHealth$150kRecreation & Sports$100kArts & Culture$50kInternational$34kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kFood & Nutrition$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $230k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST HELENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$1,000,000
ST HELENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$275,262
PAUL ALEXANDER FOUNDATION$100,000
ST HELENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$80,008
BERKLEE$50,000
EYE SURGEONS INTERNATIONAL$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$3,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$3,000
PLANNED PARETHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$3,000
ON LOK$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $3k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 13 repeat orgs$424k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against -10% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
19

Total granted

$2.1M
$269k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
-10%

Still filing today

62%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    St Helena Hospital Foundation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +38%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $36k · revenue +8%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $14k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • UB
    UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • SH
    ST HELENA LITTLE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

5
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
6
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
7
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
8
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Partners of the Americas Foundation

To advance the social economic well being of the americas.

International
12
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Helena Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST HELENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT — $1,655,270 · OtherST HELENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTPartnership for Haas Preeminence — $200,000 · OtherPartnership for Haas PreeminenceUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherPAUL ALEXANDER FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherST HELENA LITTLE LEAGUE — $100,000 · Other+16 more — $120,050 · OtherSt Helena Hospital Foundation — $100,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $36,000 · HealthEye Surgeons International — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $2,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $13,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $13,500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $10,523 · International+2 more — $1,050 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $10,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY — $6,000 · Human ServicesCRISTOSAL INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY — $3,000 · PhilanthropyPEPPERWOOD FOUNDATION — $2,500 · EnvironmentKQED INC — $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,275,320Health$148,000International$38,573Human Services$27,000Philanthropy$8,000Environment$2,500Arts & Culture$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPartnership for Haas Preeminence — $200,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSt Helena Hospital Foundation — $100,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $36,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $10,523 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAPA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $10,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEye Surgeons International — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRISTOSAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEPPERWOOD FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetON LOK INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLDREADERORG — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE MOVEMENT — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The Gamble Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Windy Bay Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph