Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wilson W Phelps Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$663k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.0MFood & Nutrition$707kHealth$432kYouth Development$426kHuman Services$417kArts & Culture$316kRecreation & Sports$251kAnimals$90kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $250k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $384k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fullerton Joint Union High Sch Dist$129,525
Fullerton School District$76,556
Community Action Partnership$75,000
Boys and Girls Club$52,500
Hart Community Homes Inc$50,000
Cal State University Fullerton$45,000
Young Lives Redeemed$35,000
SCRPA- Fullerton Train Museum$35,000
Advance On to College$25,000
Meals on Wheels of Fullerton Inc$25,000
Tara's Chance$25,000
Higher Ground Youth Family Services$25,000
PEO$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Radiant Futures$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Hart Community Homes Inc: $50k → 10%Hart Community Homes Inc: $30k → 10%Hart Community Homes Inc: $26k → 10%YWCA of North Orange County: $20k → 10%Women's Transitional Living Center: $20k → 10%Women's Transitional Living Center: $20k → 10%Women's Transitional Living Center: $10k → 10%Radiant Futures: $10k → 10%YWCA of North Orange County: $10k → 10%Assistance League of Fullerton: $2k → 10%Assistance League of Fullerton: $1k → 10%Assistance League of Fullerton: $1k → 10%Assistance League of Fullerton: $1k → 10%Assistance League of Fullerton: $1k → 10%Assistance League of Fullerton: $1k → 10%Assistance League of Fullerton: $1k → 10%Assistance League of Fullerton: $1k → 10%Assistance League of Fullerton: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 37 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
7

Total granted

$4.6M
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+97%

Still filing today

46%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIVES REDEEMED
    8× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +772%
  • TC
    TARAS CHANCE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +454%
  • HC
    HART COMMUNITY HOMES INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $106k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • FU
    Fullerton Union High Sch District
    one grant, 2017 · $59k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • CC
    CSUF Center for Healthy Neighbors
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abilities Oc

To help people with developmental disabilities reach their highest potential and guide them through their special needs journey.

Human Services
2
Turlock Education Opportunity Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
3
First Step House of Orange County Inc

To assist men suffering from alcoholism begin both their recovery and integration back into society

—
4
Whole Living Recovery

Recovery housing for women/children

Health
5
Los Angeles County African American Employees Association

Assist members pursuit of advancement

Education
6
Free Now Foundation

To educate, advocate and litigate for civil rights and health rights in California.

Health
7
Positive Outlook Housing Corp

General upkeep of facility for housing

—
8
Theatre Experience of Southern Californi

To provide exemplary extracurricular musical theatre opportunities to youth.

Arts & Culture
9
Forward Endeavors

To create trauma-informed workplaces for individuals experiencing employment barriers such as poverty, homelessness, inexperience, and limited education.

Health
10
Oc United Together

We exist to empower the vulnerable who have experienced the breakdown of the family unit through restorative relationships and life-skills development. we serve those who have experienced foster care, domestic abuse, homelessness, and…

Human Services
11
Afghan Refugee Relief

We partner closely with community organizations, local nonprofits, resettlement agencies, religious institutions and passionate volunteers focused on helping refugees, asylum-seekers and humanitarian parolees resettle in Southern…

Philanthropy
12
Fullerton Chinese Cultural Association

To promote the understanding of chineseheritage and to serve the local community through educational andcultural exchange activities. to preserve and cultivate chinese tradition, art,andculture. and to promote thr unity of the chinese…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muckenthaler Cultural Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Action Alliance Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fullerton School District: $1,034,249 · OtherFullerton School DistrictFullerton Joint Union High Sch Dist: $542,338 · OtherFullerton Joint Union High Sch DistCommunity Action Partnership: $512,000 · OtherCommunity Action PartnershipBoys and Girls Club: $306,015 · OtherBoys and Girls ClubCal State University Fullerton: $165,000 · OtherCal State University: $145,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF FULLERTON INC: $145,000 · Other+26 more: $1,090,321 · Other+26 moreYOUNG LIVES REDEEMED: $190,000 · HealthTARAS CHANCE: $110,000 · HealthACTION ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $16,960 · HealthHART COMMUNITY HOMES INC: $105,700 · Human ServicesWOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC RADIANT FUTURES: $60,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH ORANGE COUNTY: $30,165 · Human ServicesLITTLE EAGLE FREE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF FULLERTON: $9,500 · Human ServicesJOYA SCHOLARS: $104,000 · EducationADVANCE: $75,000 · EducationThe Troy Support Organization: $12,184 · EducationSouthern California Railway Plaza Association Incorporated: $48,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF JAZZ: $24,500 · Arts & CultureRENEWABLE FARMS: $50,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$3,939,923Health$316,960Human Services$220,365Education$191,184Arts & Culture$72,500Food & Nutrition$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG LIVES REDEEMED: $190,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF FULLERTON INC: $145,000 over 9y, 16% of budgetTARAS CHANCE: $110,000 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetHART COMMUNITY HOMES INC: $105,700 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetJOYA SCHOLARS: $104,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetMUCKENTHALER CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $92,650 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetADVANCE: $75,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetWOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC RADIANT FUTURES: $60,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetRENEWABLE FARMS: $50,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetSouthern California Railway Plaza Association Incorporated: $48,000 over 4y, 68% of budgetALL THE ARTS FOR ALL THE KIDS FOUNDATION: $35,513 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH ORANGE COUNTY: $30,165 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF JAZZ: $24,500 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetACTION ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $16,960 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLITTLE EAGLE FREE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetThe Troy Support Organization: $12,184 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF FULLERTON: $9,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetFullerton Rotary Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG LIVES REDEEMED ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF FULLERTON INC ↗
  • Who funds TARAS CHANCE ↗
  • Who funds HART COMMUNITY HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds JOYA SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds MUCKENTHALER CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCE ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC RADIANT FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds RENEWABLE FARMS ↗
  • Who funds Southern California Railway Plaza Association Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds ALL THE ARTS FOR ALL THE KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF JAZZ ↗
  • Who funds ACTION ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE EAGLE FREE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Troy Support Organization ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA20.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · John H Grace Foundation · American Woodmark Foundation Inc · O L Halsell Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wilson W Phelps Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wilson W Phelps Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wilson W Phelps’ filings →

    More from the funding graph