· Private foundation
Wilson & Johnson Private Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $195k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $384k
- $250k+2 grants · $730k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NAPLES CHILDREN AND EDUCATION | $480,000 |
| NAPLES ZOO INC | $250,000 |
| NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC | $100,000 |
| SEACREST SCHOOL INC | $74,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| BETTER TOGETHER STRENGTHENING FAMILIES INC | $50,000 |
| SEACREST SCHOOL INC | $50,000 |
| NAPLES CHILDREN AND EDUCATION | $50,000 |
| NAPLES CHILDREN AND EDUCATION | $37,500 |
| ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC | $30,000 |
| NAPLES ZOO INC | $25,000 |
| NAPLES CHILDREN AND EDUCATION | $17,500 |
| COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $15,000 |
| LEE COUNTY ALLIANCE OF THE ARTS INC | $10,000 |
| COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $625k · revenue +52%
- NZNAPLES ZOO INC2× · 2023–2024 · $348k · revenue +31%
- SSSEACREST SCHOOL INC2× · 2023–2024 · $169k · revenue +18%
Funded once
PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +67%- ACAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -79%
- MSMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CENTER OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INCone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…
Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.
Nami palm beach county provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.
Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation is the philanthropic partner that helps sarasota memorial health care system bring world-class care to our community.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Charting a course for living, learning, and earning with vision loss.
To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.
We continually convene a statewide community of committed leaders to enhance and recharge their leadership skills and to educate and inspire them to work across their strengths and diversities for a better florida. we engage floridians by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Children Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NAPLES ZOO INC ↗
- Who funds SEACREST SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds BETTER TOGETHER STRENGTHENING FAMILES INC ↗
- Who funds NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF COLLIER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds Naples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SEARCHING FOR SOLUTIONS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds LEE COUNTY ALLIANCE FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds STARABILITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR FLORIDA'S NATIONAL PARKS INC ↗
- Who funds QUALITY LIFE CENTER OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CENTER OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICE OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds PATH2FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds HOCKOMOCK YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · The League Club Inc · Naples Children Foundation Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Clark Family Foundation Inc · The United Way of Lee County Inc · Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc · Carol B Phelon Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wilson & Johnson Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc — 69% of income from government
- Naples Botanical Garden Inc — 3% of income from government
- Lee County Alliance for the Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Legal Aid Service of Broward County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Naples Community Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
- Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wilson & Johnson Private Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Wilson & Johnson Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.