Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wilson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$410kFood & Nutrition$198kPublic Safety & Disaster$110kEducation$76kHuman Services$55kHousing & Shelter$52kHealth$29kCommunity Improvement$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Western Colo Community Found$25,000
Grand Valley Catholic Outreach$10,000
Food Bank of the Rockies$10,000
Meals on Wheels$10,000
Marillac Health$10,000
Community Food Bank$10,000
Kids Aid$10,000
Clifton Christian Church$10,000
Colorado West Land Trust$5,000
Habitat For Humanity Of Mesa County$5,000
Latimer House$5,000
Western Colo Center For The Arts$2,500
Energy Outreach Colorado$1,000
Riverside Education Center$1,000
Partners$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Kids Aid: $10k → 11%Kids Aid: $5k → 11%Kids Aid: $5k → 11%Kids Aid: $5k → 11%Kids Aid: $5k → 11%Kids Aid: $3k → 11%Kids Aid: $3k → 11%Grand Valley Catholic Outreach: $10k → 11%Grand Valley Catholic Outreach: $5k → 11%Grand Valley Catholic Outreach: $5k → 11%Grand Valley Catholic Outreach: $3k → 11%Grand Valley Catholic Outreach: $3k → 11%Grand Valley Catholic Outreach: $3k → 11%Grand Valley Catholic Outreach: $3k → 11%Grand Valley Catholic Outreach: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$928k · 27 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +116% since the first grant, against +67% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
7

Total granted

$928k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%
+67%

Still filing today

44%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • H
    HopeWest
    2× · 2018–2019 · $110k · revenue +116%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    8× · 2018–2025 · $41k · revenue +310%
  • KA
    KIDS AID KIDS AID
    8× · 2018–2025 · $38k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • TA
    The Art Center of Western Colorado Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +72%
  • CW
    COLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +4%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
2
Colorado West Inc

We rebuild lives and inspire hope by providing exceptional mental health and addiction recovery care strengthening the health and vitality of our communities.

Health
3
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
4
Public Broadcasting of Colorado Inc

To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms

Arts & Culture
5
Grand Junction Economic Partnership

The mission of the grand junction economic partnership is to generate high quality economic development by attracting business and quality jobs to mesa county, colorado.

Community Improvement
6
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
7
Western Colorado Healthcare Alliance

To help rural providers with collaborative solutions and resources focusing on rural healthcare.

Education
8
Christian Care Mesa Iii

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

Housing & Shelter
9
Colorado Water Trust

To restore water to colorado's rivers.

Environment
10
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
11
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
12
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand Valley Catholic Outreach Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Little Flower Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Western Colo Community Foundation: $355,000 · OtherWestern Colo Community FoundationWestern Colo Community Found: $75,000 · OtherWestern Colo Community FoundClifton Elementary School: $60,000 · OtherClifton Elementary SchoolCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $41,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOOD BANKClifton Christian Church: $30,000 · Other+17 more: $120,000 · Other+17 moreHopeWest: $110,000 · Public Safety & DisasterHopeWestKIDS AID KIDS AID: $37,500 · Human ServicesGRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC: $32,500 · Human ServicesWESTERN COLORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · PhilanthropyPARTNER INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MESA COUNTY: $23,500 · Housing & ShelterHOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY: $13,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $250 · Housing & ShelterMARILLAC CLINIC INC: $21,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC: $1,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthMESA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $10,500 · Environment
Other$681,000Public Safety & Disaster$110,000Human Services$70,000Philanthropy$63,000Housing & Shelter$36,750Health$29,000Environment$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHopeWest: $110,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWESTERN COLORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $41,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetKIDS AID KIDS AID: $37,500 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetGRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC: $32,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MESA COUNTY: $23,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMARILLAC CLINIC INC: $21,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY: $13,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMESA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $9,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNER INC: $8,000 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Art Center of Western Colorado Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Little Flower Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HopeWest ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN COLORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds KIDS AID KIDS AID ↗
  • Who funds GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MESA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MARILLAC CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds MESA COUNTY LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds PARTNER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds The Art Center of Western Colorado Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Little Flower Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO29.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Goodwin Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · United Way of Mesa County Inc · St Mary's Hospital & Medical Center Inc · Bacon Family Foundation · International Association of Lions 3602 · The Colorado Trust · Anschutz Family Foundation · Gates Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wilson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wilson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wilson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph