Skip to content
Willow Springs Charitable Trust Jenny B Stoddard Trustee at a glance

· Private foundation

Willow Springs Charitable Trust Jenny B Stoddard Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
81
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$7.9MArts & Culture$6.6MEnvironment$5.5MHealth$4.8MHuman Services$4.6MPhilanthropy$3.9MCivil Rights$2.7MInternational$2.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 81 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $605k
  • $50k–250k39 grants · $4.0M
  • $250k+18 grants · $6.8M
$95,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$111M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$500,000
CATALYST FOR CHANGE$500,000
MOTHERLAND RHYTHM COMMUNITY$500,000
FOUR CORNERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$500,000
RAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS$450,000
MCHENRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$411,000
ELPC$400,000
HIGHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$350,000
SUFFIELD ACADEMY$350,000
MAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM$325,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JO DAVIESS COUNTY$319,500
GALLATIN WATERSHED COUNCIL$300,000
TWO BY TWO CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT$300,000
HRDC$300,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ROLLING HILLS PROGRESS CENTER: $50k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $150k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $150k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $150k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $150k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $150k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%BENZAITEN CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS: $75k → 11%BENZAITEN CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS: $75k → 11%FILL A HEART 4 KIDS: $15k → 8%BENZAITEN CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS: $50k → 11%BENZAITEN CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS: $20k → 11%TURNING POINT: $125k → 6%BENZAITEN CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS: $20k → 11%TURNING POINT: $125k → 6%TURNING POINT: $125k → 6%TURNING POINT: $120k → 6%TURNING POINT: $110k → 6%CYN COUNSELING CENTER: $65k → 8%CYN COUNSELING CENTER: $50k → 8%CYN COUNSELING CENTER: $50k → 8%CYN COUNSELING CENTER: $50k → 8%CYN COUNSELING CENTER: $40k → 8%SEASONS HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%TURNING POINT: $15k → 6%MAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM: $325k → 6%MAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM: $325k → 6%MAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM: $325k → 6%MAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM: $250k → 6%MAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM: $200k → 6%MAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM: $100k → 6%ALICIA'S HOUSE: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
CT
CA
CO
MD
AZ
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45M · 98 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

98 repeat relationships: 65 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

98
38

Total granted

$45M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-10%

Still filing today

67%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MOTHERLAND RHYTHM COMMUNITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +21% · 97% of their budget
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +28%
  • SA
    SUFFIELD ACADEMY
    3× · 2019–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • LC
    LORAS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $330k · revenue +1%
  • GC
    GALENA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $160k · revenue -59%
  • DE
    DAVENPORT ELEMENTRARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $109k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
4
Heartlands Conservancy

The mission of heartlands conservancy is to empower and colaborate with the people of southern illinois to advance and protect the health of our distinctive communities and nationally significant natural and cultural resources.

Environment
5
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
6
Sinnissippi Centers Inc

It is the mission of sinnissippi centers, inc. to provide quality, coordinated and responsive behavioral healthcare services to individuals, families and the communities we serve.

Health
7
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
8
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
9
Thrive Chicago Nfp

Thrive chicago's mission is to prepare chicago's youth for a vibrant future by aligning efforts and outcomes from cradle to career.

Human Services
10
Greater Chicago Food Depository

The greater chicago food depository is the nonprofit food bank serving cook county. our mission - is to end hunger. we believe food is a basic human right. to achieve our mission, we work in partnership with a network of community-based…

Food & Nutrition
11
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
12
Rimland Services Nfp

Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Allendale Association; the most unlike its peers is Soar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

92 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 92 of the 152 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

16
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
91/92
Grantees still filing
63/92
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $2,385,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODELPC: $2,150,000 · OtherELPCHIGHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,770,000 · OtherHIGHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONRAMP: $930,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JO DAVIESS COUNTY: $1,074,500 · OtherWILD SALMON CENTER: $1,085,000 · Other+103 more: $18,346,962 · Other+103 moreFOUR CORNERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,460,000 · EnvironmentFOUR CORNERS …Gallatin Watershed Council Inc: $970,000 · EnvironmentGallatin Wate…SEVEN GENERATIONS AHEAD: $825,000 · EnvironmentSEVEN GENERAT…MONTANA FRESHWATER PARTNERS INC: $590,000 · EnvironmentMONTANA FRESH…PRICKLY PEAR LAND TRUST: $580,000 · EnvironmentPRICKLY PEAR …NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $310,000 · Environment+3 more: $275,000 · EnvironmentMOTHERLAND RHYTHM COMMUNITY: $2,900,000 · Arts & CultureMOTHERLAND R…RAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $1,580,000 · Arts & CultureRAUE CENTER …TIMBER LAKE PLAYHOUSE: $620,000 · Arts & CultureTIMBER LAKE …ELGIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $460,000 · Arts & CultureELGIN SYMPHO…+6 more: $430,000 · Arts & Culture+6 moreSUFFIELD ACADEMY: $1,950,000 · EducationRiverview Center Inc: $750,000 · EducationASIAN STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: $300,000 · EducationTHE ALGEBRA PROJECT INC: $250,000 · EducationLAKESIDE LEGACY FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EducationNEXT STEP HOUSING: $165,000 · Education+1 more: $110,000 · EducationMAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM INC: $1,525,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $800,000 · Human ServicesTurning Point Inc: $620,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY YOUTH NETWORK INC: $255,000 · Human ServicesBENZAITEN CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS INC: $240,000 · Human Services+4 more: $185,000 · Human ServicesCATALYST FOR CHANGE INC: $1,475,000 · Housing & ShelterPADS OF ELGIN INC: $590,000 · Housing & ShelterSHELTER CARE MINISTRIES: $295,000 · Housing & ShelterHome of the Sparrow Inc: $250,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,300,000 · Crime & LegalCHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $125,000 · Crime & LegalTyler's Justice Center for Children: $100,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$27,741,462Environment$6,010,000Arts & Culture$5,990,000Education$3,725,000Human Services$3,625,000Housing & Shelter$2,660,000Crime & Legal$2,525,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOTHERLAND RHYTHM COMMUNITY: $2,900,000 over 6y, 97% of budgetFOUR CORNERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,460,000 over 6y, 100% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,300,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSUFFIELD ACADEMY: $1,950,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetHIGHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,770,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetRAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $1,580,000 over 6y, 22% of budgetMAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM INC: $1,525,000 over 6y, 33% of budgetCATALYST FOR CHANGE INC: $1,475,000 over 4y, 58% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER: $1,085,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JO DAVIESS COUNTY: $1,074,500 over 5y, 70% of budgetGallatin Watershed Council Inc: $970,000 over 4y, 77% of budgetCROSSCUT MOUNTAIN SPORTS CENTER: $900,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetTwo By Two Character Development: $900,000 over 3y, 46% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $890,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSEVEN GENERATIONS AHEAD: $825,000 over 6y, 65% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $800,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRiverview Center Inc: $750,000 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetCOOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT FUND OF CDS: $700,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetTIMBER LAKE PLAYHOUSE: $620,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetTurning Point Inc: $620,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $604,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMONTANA FRESHWATER PARTNERS INC: $590,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetPADS OF ELGIN INC: $590,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetPRICKLY PEAR LAND TRUST: $580,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY: $500,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIndependence Health & Therapy: $500,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetELGIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $460,000 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $370,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetBALLENISLES CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $345,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetLORAS COLLEGE: $330,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $310,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $310,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: $300,000 over 2y, 77% of budgetSHELTER CARE MINISTRIES: $295,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetUNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS: $295,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE DUNDEE TOWNSHIP: $292,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetPOVERTY 2 PROSPERITY INC: $285,000 over 4y, 39% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH NETWORK INC: $255,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetHome of the Sparrow Inc: $250,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ALGEBRA PROJECT INC: $250,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetMONTANA CONSERVATION CORPS INC: $250,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBENZAITEN CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS INC: $240,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR: $240,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MCHENRY COU: $225,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetKids Above All Illinois: $205,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetOPENLANDS: $200,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOTHERLAND RHYTHM COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds FOUR CORNERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SUFFIELD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST FOR CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JO DAVIESS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Gallatin Watershed Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROSSCUT MOUNTAIN SPORTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Two By Two Character Development ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN GENERATIONS AHEAD ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Riverview Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT FUND OF CDS ↗
  • Who funds TIMBER LAKE PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Turning Point Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA FRESHWATER PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PADS OF ELGIN INC ↗
  • Who funds PRICKLY PEAR LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE JACKSON LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds Independence Health & Therapy ↗
  • Who funds ELGIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Full Circle FoundationThe Community Foundat…Andrew and Alice Fisc…Foglia Family Foundat…George M Eisenberg Fo…The Chicago Community…Northwestern Memorial…Aptargroup Charitable…Heartland Charitable …Mental Health Resourc…Webb FoundationGrand Victoria Founda…
Full Circle FoundationIL34.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Full Circle Foundation · The Community Foundation for McHenry County · Andrew and Alice Fischer Charitable Trust · Foglia Family Foundation · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · The Chicago Community Trust · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Aptargroup Charitable Foundation · Heartland Charitable Trust · Mental Health Resource League for McHenry County Inc · Webb Foundation · Grand Victoria Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Willow Springs Charitable Trust Jenny B Stoddard Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Willow Springs Charitable Trust Jenny B Stoddard Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • Wild Salmon Center: 49% of income from government
  • The Young People's Project Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Willow Springs Charitable Trust Jenny B Stoddard Trustee?

Find your warmest path to Willow Springs Charitable Trust Jenny B Stoddard Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 152 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Willow Springs Charitable Trust Jenny B Stoddard Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home