Skip to content

· Private foundation

Willow Grove Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$238k
Granted FY2018
42
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Environment$108kHuman Services$50kFood & Nutrition$35kArts & Culture$33kHealth$32kHousing & Shelter$24kEducation$14kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2018 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k38 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $101k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$264k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENNYPACK ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION TRUST$100,500
OLD YORK ROAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY$30,000
ABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
INTER-FAITH HOUSING ALLIANCE$11,100
LAUREL HOUSE$6,000
CRADLE OF HOPE INC$5,000
BRIAR BUSH NATURE CENTER$4,500
THE BREATHING ROOM FOUNDATION$4,000
CHELTEN BAPTIST CHURCH$3,500
ST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH$3,000
CHELTEN BAPTIST SEEDS OF HOPE FOOD PANTRY$3,000
DICKENS AUXILIARY OF THE AHF WOMAN'S BOARD AMH$2,500
WILLOW GROVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$2,500
SETTLEMENT MUSIC SCHOOL$2,500
CONCERN$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CRADLE OF HOPE INC: $5k → 7%CRADLE OF HOPE INC: $3k → 7%EVERY GOOD GIFT: $3k → 7%INTER-FAITH HOUSING ALLIANCE: $11k → 7%INTER-FAITH HOUSING ALLIANCE: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$201k · 12 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +212% since the first grant, against +90% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$201k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+212%
+90%

Still filing today

33%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $14k · revenue +212%
  • CO
    Cradle of Hope Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue +304%
  • CS
    CENTER SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • UM
    UPPER MORELAND YOUTH AND DRUG COUNCIL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +90%
  • BC
    BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • EG
    EVERY GOOD GIFTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +181%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers

Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers creates and sustains healthy rural communities by providing accessible, high quality medical, dental and behavioral health care for all, while recognizing and addressing other factors that influence…

Health
2
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
3
Cornerstone Montgomery

Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.

—
4
Family Service Association of Bucks County

Mission: we listen, care and help. every day. vision: a community where anyone can achieve their full potential. programs: our services treat mental health issues; reduce substance use; shelter, feed, educate and seek permanent housing for…

Human Services
5
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
6
Maternal & Family Health Services Inc

As a private non-profit health and human services organization, maternal and family health services (mfhs) works to meet the health and nutrition needs of northeastern pennsylvania's women, children, and families with essential…

Health
7
Elwyn of Pennsylvania and Delaware

Elwyn makes life better for people with developmental and behavioral health challenges.

Human Services
8
Public Health Management Corporation

Public health management corporation (phmc) is a nonprofit public health institute that creates and sustains healthier communities. phmc uses best practices to improve community health through direct service, partnership, innovation,…

Health
9
Accessmatters

Accessmatters' mission is to protect, expand, and enhance access to sexual and reproductive health care and information for all people. accessmatters fulfills its mission by providing services and information directly to people, by…

Health
10
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
11
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
12
Princeton Healthcare System a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation

The mission of princeton healthcare system is to provide exceptional, compassionate care to enhance the health and wellness of our patients, their families, and our community. princeton healthcare system provides inpatient and outpatient…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise Montco Pa; the most unlike its peers is Old York Road Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILLOW GROVE CHARITIES: $36,500 · OtherWILLOW GROVE CHARITIESOLD YORK ROAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $30,000 · OtherOLD YORK ROAD HISTORICAL SOCIETYCHELTEN BAPTIST SEEDS OF HOPE FOOD PANTRY: $13,000 · OtherCHELTEN BAPTIST SEEDS OF HOPE FOOD PANTRYBRIAR BUSH NATURE CENTER: $6,500 · Other+38 more: $66,500 · Other+38 morePENNYPACK ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION TRUST: $101,000 · EnvironmentPENNYPACK ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION TR…FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA: $14,100 · Human ServicesFAMILY PRO…Cradle of Hope Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesCradle of …LAUREL HOUSE: $6,000 · Human ServicesLAUREL HOU…EVERY GOOD GIFT: $2,500 · Human ServicesEVERY GOOD…ABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthABINGTON …HEALTHLINK DENTAL CLINIC INC: $2,000 · HealthHEALTHLIN…THE BREATHING ROOM FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropySETTLEMENT MUSIC SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,500 · Arts & CultureWILLOW GROVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $2,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$152,500Environment$101,000Human Services$30,100Health$27,000Philanthropy$4,000Arts & Culture$2,500Housing & Shelter$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPENNYPACK ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION TRUST: $101,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetOLD YORK ROAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $30,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCradle of Hope Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetLAUREL HOUSE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUPPER MORELAND YOUTH AND DRUG COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE BREATHING ROOM FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSETTLEMENT MUSIC SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY GOOD GIFT: $2,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetWILLOW GROVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER SCHOOL: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHLINK DENTAL CLINIC INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBUX-MONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetACCESS SERVICES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PENNYPACK ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds OLD YORK ROAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA ↗
  • Who funds Cradle of Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAUREL HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds UPPER MORELAND YOUTH AND DRUG COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREATHING ROOM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SETTLEMENT MUSIC SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds EVERY GOOD GIFT ↗
  • Who funds WILLOW GROVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds CENTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHLINK DENTAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds BUX-MONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS AND POLICE TOGETHER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb CharitableDE21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb Charitable · The Philadelphia Foundation · Vesta Fund · The Windmill Foundation Inc · Montgomery County Foundation Inc · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Healthspark Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Willow Grove Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Willow Grove Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Willow Grove Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Willow Grove Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Willow Grove’s filings →

    More from the funding graph