Skip to content

· Private foundation

Willie I Wanda & W F Martin Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$431k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$2.1MHuman Services$88kHealth$83kCrime & Legal$63kFood & Nutrition$56kHousing & Shelter$20k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $83k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $349k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCMURRY UNIVERSITY$125,000
NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY$90,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ABILENE$73,500
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION$60,000
BIG COUNTRY CASA$12,500
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
FOOD BANK OF ABILENE$10,000
ABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE$10,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$10,000
PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CARE MISSION$10,000
CHRISTIAN SERVICE CENTER OF ABILENE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 16%CHRISTIAN SERVICE CENTER OF ABILENE: $10k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 16%CHRISTIAN SERVICE CENTER OF ABILENE: $10k → 16%CHRISTIAN SERVICE CENTER OF ABILENE: $10k → 16%CHRISTIAN SERVICE CENTER OF ABILENE: $8k → 16%CHRISTIAN SERVICE CENTER OF ABILENE: $8k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$2.4M
$0

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MCMURRY UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $750k · revenue +82%
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $320k · revenue +14%
  • BC
    BIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $63k · revenue +2%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    West Texas Food Bank

    The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

    —
    2
    Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

    Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

    —
    3
    Bridge Ministries of Bryan Texas

    To share Christ with others through serving those in need in the brazos valley and surrounding areas or wherever God leads and to bridge the gap by joining churches and other groups in serving together.

    Religion
    4
    High Plains Food Bank

    The High Plains Food Bank exists to help solve the issue of hunger and food insecurity in the Texas Panhandle.

    —
    5
    Abilene Christian School Inc

    The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

    Education
    6
    Pryor Ministries Center

    Provide food & clothing to those in need

    Human Services
    7
    A Bridge to Opportunity Inc

    To operate a 30 unit permanent and temporary housing facility known as Destiny Village for rental to low income individuals and families who are survivors of domestic violence and or sexual assault

    Housing & Shelter
    8
    Abilene Chamber of Commerce Foundation

    The purpose of the Organization is to provide knowledge and understanding of economics, matters of public concern, finance, education and training, and problems of minority groups therby promoting the economy and quality of life in Abilene…

    —
    9
    Hays County Food Bank

    To alleviate hunger by distributing food to families who are food deprived through a network of volunteers and other agencies within Hays County.

    —
    10
    Fredericksburg Community Health Center

    The mission of the Good Samaritan Center is to provide a safe, Christ- Centered environment that gives our patients quality, coordinated and affordable healthcare.

    Health
    11
    Fort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels and Much Much More

    See Schedule OFort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels provides comprehensive services, including Meals on Wheels, congregate meals, transportation, case management, health screenings, information and referral services, recreation, and more. Our…

    Human Services
    12
    Feeding Texas

    To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

    Community Improvement
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Service Center of Abilene; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    7/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    MCMURRY UNIVERSITY: $750,000 · EducationMCMURRY UNIVERSITYTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $320,000 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INCNEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY: $541,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITYJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ABILENE: $391,625 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ABILENEPresbyterian Medical Care Mission: $42,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $42,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherChristian Service Center of Abilene: $45,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS: $37,500 · Human ServicesBIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $62,500 · Crime & LegalABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureAbilene Hope Haven Inc: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterFood Bank of West Central Texas: $18,000 · Food & Nutrition
    Education$1,070,000Other$1,057,625Human Services$82,500Crime & Legal$62,500Arts & Culture$50,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Food & Nutrition$18,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMCMURRY UNIVERSITY: $750,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $320,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $62,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetChristian Service Center of Abilene: $45,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetPresbyterian Medical Care Mission: $42,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $37,500 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetAbilene Hope Haven Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetFood Bank of West Central Texas: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds MCMURRY UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds BIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
    • Who funds ABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INC ↗
    • Who funds Christian Service Center of Abilene ↗
    • Who funds Presbyterian Medical Care Mission ↗
    • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
    • Who funds Abilene Hope Haven Inc ↗
    • Who funds Food Bank of West Central Texas ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Barber FoundationTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Barber Foundation · Shelton Family Foundation · The Legett Foundation · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Community Foundation of Abilene · United Way of Abilene Inc · Abilene Christian University · The Karakin Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Willie I Wanda & W F Martin Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Willie I Wanda & W F Martin Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Willie I Wanda & W F Martin Charitable Trust?

      Find your warmest path to Willie I Wanda & W F Martin Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Willie I Wanda & W F Martin’s filings →

      More from the funding graph