Skip to content

· Private foundation

Williams McClain Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kCommunity Improvement$14kArts & Culture$9kHuman Services$7kHealth$5kEducation$4kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$76k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLUE RIDGE INNOCATION CORRIDOR$10,000
MARTINSVILLE - HENRY COUNTY FAMILY YMCA$5,000
UNITED WAY$4,500
GRACE NETWORK$2,000
CENTRA FOUNDATION$1,500
PIEDMONT ARTS$1,000
PATRICK & HENRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$1,000
ROOSTER WALK INC$600
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$500
THE WARMING CENTER$500
CAMP KUM-BE-YAH$250
YOUNG LIFE MARTINSVILLE-HENRY COUNTY$250
FIGSBORO RURITAN CLUB$100
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%PEER RECOVERY CONNECTION INC: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62k · 15 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
15

Total granted

$62k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+20%

Still filing today

27%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RW
    ROOSTER WALK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +24%
  • PH
    PATRICK & HENRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +34%
  • PC
    PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF MHC INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • BH
    BASSETT HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC BOOSTER
    one grant, 2024 · $500
  • SV
    SOUTHERN VA RECREATION FACILITIES AUTHOR
    one grant, 2023 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pamlico Business Resource Center
Community Improvement
2
Bedford County Regional Education Foundation

Support students at the Allegany College of Maryland - Bedford County campus.

Education
3
Fredericksburg Regional Chamber of Commerce

The fredericksburg regional chamber of commerce promotes business and community activities in the fredericksburg region and surrounding areas.

—
4
Rock Hill Economic Development Corporation

Rock Hill Development Corporation develops business parks, recruits and supports new businesses to the area, and assists in the revitalization of Rock Hill.

Community Improvement
5
Martinsville-Henry County Chamber of Commerce Inc

The martinsville-henry county chamber of commerce, inc. is organized for the purpose of advancing the commercial, industrial, and civic inerests of the city of martinsville and henry county, virginia

Community Improvement
6
Philipsburg Revitalizaiton Corporation

The Organization is a community based Organization dedicated to preserving the qualtiy of life and peaceful small town heritage by promoting community and economic development.

Arts & Culture
7
Randolph Community College Foundation Inc

The randolph community college foundation is a non profit organization that provides a margin of excellence for randolph community college by building a strong relationship with the local community, aquiring and managing contributions, and…

—
8
Pitt Community College Foundation Inc

Pitt Community College Foundation's purpose is to receive gifts and secure external resources for scholarships, academic programs, and other activities of Pitt Community College.

—
9
Pipe Creek Christian School

Educational nbsp;christian nbsp;school

Education
10
The Foundation for Pierce College

The mission of the Foundation is to develop resources and increase public awareness to support the students, educational programs and campus for the benefit of the community serviced by the college

—
11
Yadkin Valley Chamber of Commerce

The Yadkin Valley Chamber of Commerce is an organization that promotes a positive business environment, community betterment and supports economic development

—
12
Harrisburg Regional Chamber

The mission of the harrisburg regional chamber is to be a catalyst for policy change, for job creation and for business growth in cumberland, dauphin, and perry counties that enhances the quality of life in our region.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Care Center of Mhc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Radford Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY: $16,450 · OtherUNITED WAYGRACE NETWORK: $14,500 · OtherGRACE NETWORKMARTINSVILLE - HENRY COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $6,550 · OtherMARTINSVILLE - HENRY COUNTY FAMILY YMCAPIEDMONT ARTS: $5,000 · OtherPIEDMONT ARTSCENTRA FOUNDATION: $3,000 · OtherTHE WARMING CENTER: $2,000 · OtherMARTINSVILLE UPTOWN ROTARY CLUB: $2,000 · OtherC-PEG: $2,000 · Other+16 more: $6,700 · Other+16 moreBLUE RIDGE INNOVATION CORRIDOR: $10,000 · Community ImprovementBLUE RIDGE INN…ROOSTER WALK INC: $3,200 · EducationCARLISLE SCHOOL: $500 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationPATRICK & HENRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,250 · PhilanthropyROTARY CLUB OF FOREST FOUNDATION INC: $100 · PhilanthropyPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF MHC INC: $1,100 · HealthSpencer-Penn School Preservation Organization Inc: $1,000 · Arts & CulturePEER RECOVERY CONNECTION INC: $250 · Human Services
Other$58,200Community Improvement$10,000Education$3,800Philanthropy$2,350Health$1,100Arts & Culture$1,000Human Services$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLUE RIDGE INNOVATION CORRIDOR: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetROOSTER WALK INC: $3,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPATRICK & HENRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF MHC INC: $1,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSpencer-Penn School Preservation Organization Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCARLISLE SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEER RECOVERY CONNECTION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Kum-Ba-Yah Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGODS PIT CREW INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRADFORD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF FOREST FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKim Jones Memorial Fund Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE INNOVATION CORRIDOR ↗
  • Who funds ROOSTER WALK INC ↗
  • Who funds PATRICK & HENRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF MHC INC ↗
  • Who funds Spencer-Penn School Preservation Organization Inc ↗
  • Who funds CARLISLE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PEER RECOVERY CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Camp Kum-Ba-Yah Inc ↗
  • Who funds GODS PIT CREW INC ↗
  • Who funds RADFORD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF FOREST FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Kim Jones Memorial Fund Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foster FoundationVA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foster Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Williams McClain Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Williams McClain Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Williams McClain Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Williams McClain Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Williams McClain’s filings →

    More from the funding graph