Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Williams McClain Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kCommunity Improvement$14kArts & Culture$9kHuman Services$7kHealth$5kEducation$4kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$76k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLUE RIDGE INNOCATION CORRIDOR$10,000
MARTINSVILLE - HENRY COUNTY FAMILY YMCA$5,000
UNITED WAY$4,500
GRACE NETWORK$2,000
CENTRA FOUNDATION$1,500
PATRICK & HENRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$1,000
PIEDMONT ARTS$1,000
ROOSTER WALK INC$600
THE WARMING CENTER$500
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$500
YOUNG LIFE MARTINSVILLE-HENRY COUNTY$250
CAMP KUM-BE-YAH$250
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$100
FIGSBORO RURITAN CLUB$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%PEER RECOVERY CONNECTION INC: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$62k · 15 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
15

Total granted

$62k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+20%

Still filing today

27%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RW
    ROOSTER WALK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +24%
  • PH
    PATRICK & HENRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +34%
  • PC
    PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF MHC INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • SV
    SOUTHERN VA RECREATION FACILITIES AUTHOR
    one grant, 2023 · $500
  • MW
    MVHS WARRIOR BAND BOOSTERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pamlico Business Resource Center
Community Improvement
2
Bedford County Regional Education Foundation

Support students at the Allegany College of Maryland - Bedford County campus.

Education
3
Fredericksburg Regional Chamber of Commerce

The fredericksburg regional chamber of commerce promotes business and community activities in the fredericksburg region and surrounding areas.

4
Rock Hill Economic Development Corporation

Rock Hill Development Corporation develops business parks, recruits and supports new businesses to the area, and assists in the revitalization of Rock Hill.

Community Improvement
5
Martinsville-Henry County Chamber of Commerce Inc

The martinsville-henry county chamber of commerce, inc. is organized for the purpose of advancing the commercial, industrial, and civic inerests of the city of martinsville and henry county, virginia

Community Improvement
6
Philipsburg Revitalizaiton Corporation

The Organization is a community based Organization dedicated to preserving the qualtiy of life and peaceful small town heritage by promoting community and economic development.

Arts & Culture
7
Randolph Community College Foundation Inc

The randolph community college foundation is a non profit organization that provides a margin of excellence for randolph community college by building a strong relationship with the local community, aquiring and managing contributions, and…

8
Pitt Community College Foundation Inc

Pitt Community College Foundation's purpose is to receive gifts and secure external resources for scholarships, academic programs, and other activities of Pitt Community College.

9
Pipe Creek Christian School

Educational nbsp;christian nbsp;school

Education
10
The Foundation for Pierce College

The mission of the Foundation is to develop resources and increase public awareness to support the students, educational programs and campus for the benefit of the community serviced by the college

11
Yadkin Valley Chamber of Commerce

The Yadkin Valley Chamber of Commerce is an organization that promotes a positive business environment, community betterment and supports economic development

12
Harrisburg Regional Chamber

The mission of the harrisburg regional chamber is to be a catalyst for policy change, for job creation and for business growth in cumberland, dauphin, and perry counties that enhances the quality of life in our region.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Care Center of Mhc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Radford Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY — $16,450 · OtherUNITED WAYGRACE NETWORK — $14,500 · OtherGRACE NETWORKMARTINSVILLE - HENRY COUNTY FAMILY YMCA — $6,550 · OtherMARTINSVILLE - HENRY COUNTY FAMILY YMCAPIEDMONT ARTS — $5,000 · OtherPIEDMONT ARTSCENTRA FOUNDATION — $3,000 · OtherTHE WARMING CENTER — $2,000 · OtherMARTINSVILLE UPTOWN ROTARY CLUB — $2,000 · OtherC-PEG — $2,000 · Other+16 more — $6,700 · Other+16 moreBLUE RIDGE INNOVATION CORRIDOR — $10,000 · Community ImprovementBLUE RIDGE INN…ROOSTER WALK INC — $3,200 · EducationCARLISLE SCHOOL — $500 · Education+1 more — $100 · EducationPATRICK & HENRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $2,250 · PhilanthropyROTARY CLUB OF FOREST FOUNDATION INC — $100 · PhilanthropyPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF MHC INC — $1,100 · HealthSpencer-Penn School Preservation Organization Inc — $1,000 · Arts & CultureGODS PIT CREW INC — $250 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$58,200Community Improvement$10,000Education$3,800Philanthropy$2,350Health$1,100Arts & Culture$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBLUE RIDGE INNOVATION CORRIDOR — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetROOSTER WALK INC — $3,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPATRICK & HENRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF MHC INC — $1,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSpencer-Penn School Preservation Organization Inc — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCARLISLE SCHOOL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGODS PIT CREW INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Kum-Ba-Yah Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEER RECOVERY CONNECTION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRADFORD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKim Jones Memorial Fund Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF FOREST FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE INNOVATION CORRIDOR
  • Who funds ROOSTER WALK INC
  • Who funds PATRICK & HENRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF MHC INC
  • Who funds Spencer-Penn School Preservation Organization Inc
  • Who funds CARLISLE SCHOOL
  • Who funds GODS PIT CREW INC
  • Who funds Camp Kum-Ba-Yah Inc
  • Who funds PEER RECOVERY CONNECTION INC
  • Who funds RADFORD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds Kim Jones Memorial Fund Inc
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF FOREST FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foster FoundationVA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foster Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Williams McClain Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Williams McClain Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Williams McClain Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph