Skip to content

· Private foundation

Williams Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$420k
Granted FY2025still arriving
48
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

International$799kReligion$493kHealth$257kHuman Services$185kFood & Nutrition$140kHousing & Shelter$75kCivil Rights$70kAnimals$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k41 grants · $118k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $177k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$685k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHOICES Pregnancy Centers$125,000
Compassion International$52,017
Wooddale Church$40,000
One Mission$35,100
Christ's Church$30,000
Mercy Ships$10,000
Prison Fellowship$10,000
Feed My Starving Children$9,680
World News Group$7,511
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Christian Veterinary Mission$7,500
Blessing for Life$5,091
Mission Ministries$5,000
Samaritan's Purse$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BLESSING FOR LIFE: $15k → 11%Christian Family Care: $10k → 11%CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE: $10k → 11%Blessing for Life: $10k → 11%Blessing for Life: $7k → 11%Blessing for Life: $5k → 11%Christian Family Care: $5k → 11%Blessing for Life: $2k → 11%Christian Family Care: $1k → 11%Christian Family Care: $1k → 11%ANGELS ON PATROL: $500 → 11%Angel's On Patrol: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 43 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
36

Total granted

$2.1M
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-4%

Still filing today

19%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionCivil RightsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FM
    FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $130k · revenue +40%
  • OM
    ONE MISSION INC DBA 1MISSION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $75k · revenue +11%
  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • OM
    ONE MISSION FB
    one grant, 2021 · $16k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
2
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
3
Caring Ministries Inc

Food and clothing distribution along the arizona/mexico border and southern arizona. provide living quarters for volunteer missionaries who have no other place to live and to provide support to orphanages.

Religion
4
Springfield Rescue Mission

The goal of the springfield rescue mission since 1892 has been to meet the physical and spiritual needs of the hungry, homeless, addicted, and poor by introducing them to christ and helping them apply the word of god to every area of their…

Human Services
5
Light of Life Ministries Inc

Light of life transforms lives through the love of christ by providing food, shelter, and hope to men, women, and children experiencing homelessness, poverty, or addiction to restore them as healthy members of our community.

Human Services
6
Lutheran Social Services of the Southwest

We stabilize people during crisis and transition, build a foundation where people can thrive, and preserve dignity and respect for the most vulnerable.

Religion
7
Orlando Union Rescue Mission Inc

To bring the hungry, hurting, and homeless to a new life, new goals, and a new future in christ.

Housing & Shelter
8
Eyewitness Missions
Philanthropy
9
Phoenix Seminary Inc

Phoenix seminary's mission is to train men and women for christ-centered ministry for the building of healthy churches in phoenix and the world.

Education
10
La Mission Por Vida
International
11
Fruitful Missions
Religion
12
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phoenix Gospel Mission; the most unlike its peers is Blessing for Life Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Compassion International: $267,572 · OtherCompassion InternationalWooddale Church: $240,158 · OtherWooddale ChurchCHRISTS CHURCH: $187,750 · OtherCHRISTS CHURCHCHOICES Pregnancy Centers: $167,639 · OtherCHOICES Pregnancy CentersMercy Ships: $162,650 · OtherMercy ShipsSamaritan's Purse: $141,133 · OtherSamaritan's PurseEducarte: $66,500 · Other+74 more: $644,895 · Other+74 moreFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $130,325 · InternationalFEED MY ST…ONE MISSION INC DBA 1MISSION: $74,620 · InternationalONE MISSIO…+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalBLESSING FOR LIFE INC: $39,315 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY INC: $27,011 · Human Services+1 more: $750 · Human ServicesALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $40,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC: $25,000 · EducationGilbert Christian Schools Inc: $5,702 · EducationPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $11,400 · ReligionST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,878,297International$209,945Human Services$67,076Civil Rights$40,000Education$30,702Religion$11,400Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $130,325 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetONE MISSION INC DBA 1MISSION: $74,620 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetSTEPS OF LOVE: $52,200 over 3y, 16% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY INC: $27,011 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $11,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGilbert Christian Schools Inc: $5,702 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS ON PATROL INC: $750 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE MISSION INC DBA 1MISSION ↗
  • Who funds STEPS OF LOVE ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds BLESSING FOR LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Williams Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Williams Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Williams Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Williams Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Williams’ filings →

    More from the funding graph