Skip to content

· Private foundation

Williams Childrens Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$108kHuman Services$98kAnimals$84kPublic Benefit$53kYouth Development$51kHealth$20kRecreation & Sports$4kCrime & Legal$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $68k
$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Big Dog Ranch Resue$27,042
Western Golf Assoc-Evans Scholars$18,000
Shelter For Abused Women & Children$12,660
Fraternal and Sorority Societyorg$10,440
St Louis University$5,000
St John Vianney HS$5,000
YouthBridge Community Fdtn$4,000
East Coast Baseball Fdtn$2,939
Hannibal LaGrange Univ$2,500
Various Small Donations$1,050
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Mighty Cause MK Ranch$500
Habitat For Humanity$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Sacred Selections: $1k → 18%Care To Learn: $1k → 15%Shelter For Abused Women & Children: $13k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
MO
VA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$235k · 15 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
56

Total granted

$235k
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+41%

Still filing today

47%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BD
    BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $84k · revenue +37%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $53k · revenue +107%
  • RC
    Rhodes College
    2× · 2020–2021 · $14k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • SP
    SWFL Prep and Tech Inst
    one grant, 2023 · $19k
  • WG
    Western Golf Evans Scholars
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • TU
    The University of Tampa Incorporatedgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
University of St Thomas

We are the University of St. Thomas, the Catholic University in the heart of Houston. We are committed to the Catholic intellectual tradition and the dialogue between faith and reason. By pursuing excellence in teaching, scholarship and…

Education
3
University of St Thomas

Inspired by catholic intellectual tradition, the university of st. thomas educates students to be morally responsible leaders who think critically, act wisely, and work skillfully to advance the common good. founded in 1885, the university…

Education
4
Saint Martin's University

Saint martin's students learn to make a positive difference in their lives and in the lives of others through the interaction of faith, reason, and service. the university honors both the sacredness of the individual and the significance…

Education
5
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
6
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
7
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
8
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
9
Maryville University - St Louis

Maryville university is one of the outstanding private universities in the midwest offering an innovative liberal arts education leading to excellent academic and professional programs in the arts and sciences, health professions,…

Education
10
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
11
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
12
Stevenson University

The university is an innovative, coeducational, independent institution offering undergraduate and graduate students a career-focused education marked by individualized attention, civility, and respect for difference. the university blends…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Niceville Football Little League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TURNING POINT USA INC: $52,974 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCAscension Charity: $30,000 · OtherAscension CharitySWFL Prep and Tech Inst: $18,500 · OtherSWFL Prep and Tech InstWestern Golf Assoc-Evans Scholars: $18,000 · OtherWestern Golf Assoc-Evans ScholarsFraternal and Sorority Societyorg: $10,440 · Other+63 more: $143,661 · Other+63 moreBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $84,314 · AnimalsBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE I…Rhodes College: $13,800 · EducationRhodes Coll…ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $12,500 · EducationST LOUIS UN…The University of Tampa Incorporated: $7,970 · EducationThe Univers…UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …Hannibal LaGrange University: $2,500 · EducationHannibal La…THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $12,660 · Human ServicesSACRED SELECTIONS: $1,145 · Human ServicesCare to Learn: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesWORLD PEDIATRICS: $5,000 · InternationalPATH2FREEDOM INC: $3,148 · Crime & LegalNiceville Football Little League: $2,500 · Youth Development
Other$273,575Animals$84,314Education$41,770Human Services$14,905International$5,000Crime & Legal$3,148Youth Development$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $84,314 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $52,974 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRhodes College: $13,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $12,660 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $7,970 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,800 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD PEDIATRICS: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPATH2FREEDOM INC: $3,148 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNiceville Football Little League: $2,500 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,881 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED SELECTIONS: $1,145 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWE LOVE WHITE COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCare to Learn: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS IN THE MIDDLE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Rhodes College ↗
  • Who funds THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tampa Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD PEDIATRICS ↗
  • Who funds PATH2FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds Niceville Football Little League ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Williams Childrens Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Williams Childrens Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Williams Childrens’ filings →

More from the funding graph