Skip to content

· Private foundation

William Wright Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$686k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.7MRecreation & Sports$1.5MHuman Services$598kYouth Development$470kEducation$355kArts & Culture$148kReligion$130kFood & Nutrition$98kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $350k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Adaptive Sports Center$250,000
United Mitochondrial Disease Foundation$200,000
AOPA Foundation$50,000
The Salvation Army of North Texas$50,000
Boys & Girls Club of Vernon Inc$50,000
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center$30,000
Dallas Theological Seminary$30,000
Fort Worth Stock Show Syndicate$19,852
Wilbarger County Junior Livestock Show$6,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Mommies in Need Inc: $33k → 14%Mommies in Need Inc: $30k → 14%Mommies in Need Inc: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 37% of William Wright Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 30% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 55%.

William Wright Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 12 repeat orgs$565k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$5.5M
$489k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureSocial ScienceHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UM
    UNITED MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +17%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $560k · revenue +71%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of Vernon Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +78%
  • HO
    House of Hope
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • AP
    Annie's Place
    one grant, 2023 · $55k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lone Star Flight Museum

Lone Star Flight Museum (LSFM) celebrates flight and achievements in Texas aviation, engages youth through STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math), and believes aviation inspires achievement and endless possibilities.

Arts & Culture
2
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education
3
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
4
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
7
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
8
Texas a&M Foundation

The texas a&m foundation builds a brighter future for texas a&m university, one relationship at a time, by uniting generosity and vision to raise support and manage endowed gifts.

Education
9
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
10
Texas Future Farmers of America Foundation Inc

Building on the proven success of texas agriculture education and the texas ffa program, our mission is distinguished by the continued development, funding, and implementation of cutting edge learning opportunities focusing on academic…

Food & Nutrition
11
Episcopal Foundation of Dallas

The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.

Religion
12
American Astronomical Society

The american astronomical society (aas), established in 1899, is the major organization of professional astronomers in north america. the basic objective of the aas is to promote the advancement of astronomy and closely related branches of…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Shane Thurston Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Adaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc: $1,475,000 · OtherAdaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte IncBoys and Girls Club of Vernon Inc: $450,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of Vernon IncThe Salvation Army of North Texas: $340,000 · OtherThe Salvation Army of North TexasEDUCATION OPENS DOORS INC: $150,000 · OtherUT MD Anderson Cancer Center: $130,000 · OtherHouse of Hope: $100,000 · Other+10 more: $234,752 · Other+10 moreUNITED MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $1,850,000 · HealthUNITED MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASE FOUNDATI…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 · Health+1 more: $27,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $560,000 · Social ScienceALZHEIMER'…Dallas Theological Seminary: $130,000 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $125,000 · EducationASCENSION ACADEMY: $80,000 · EducationRed River Valley Museum: $120,000 · Arts & CultureFRONTIERS OF FLIGHT MUSEUM INC: $27,500 · Arts & CultureMOMMIES IN NEED: $82,500 · Human ServicesTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$2,879,752Health$1,977,500Social Science$560,000Education$335,000Arts & Culture$147,500Human Services$82,500Public Safety & Disaster$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $1,850,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetAdaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc: $1,475,000 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $560,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Vernon Inc: $450,000 over 9y, 6.9% of budgetEDUCATION OPENS DOORS INC: $150,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary: $130,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRed River Valley Museum: $120,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOMMIES IN NEED: $82,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetASCENSION ACADEMY: $80,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRONTIERS OF FLIGHT MUSEUM INC: $27,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH: $27,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWELCOME HOME RECOVERY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE: $19,852 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHANE THURSTON FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Adaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Vernon Inc ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION OPENS DOORS INC ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Theological Seminary ↗
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Red River Valley Museum ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOMMIES IN NEED ↗
  • Who funds ASCENSION ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRONTIERS OF FLIGHT MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds WELCOME HOME RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE ↗
  • Who funds SHANE THURSTON FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William Wright Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William Wright Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William Wright Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to William Wright Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William Wright Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph