Skip to content

· Private foundation

William Schampeau Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$788kEducation$227kPhilanthropy$137kHealth$78kReligion$41kYouth Development$40kPublic Benefit$38kHousing & Shelter$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $111k
$8,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CELL DOGS INC$25,000
CITY OF HOPE$22,500
LOUISVILLE HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
IGBY MINISTRIES$12,500
LADY OF GRACE CHURCH$11,000
ST MONICA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUDATI$8,000
HUGS$7,500
MOUNT CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL$6,000
WESPARK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$2,500
VOICE OF OC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $20k → 9%WESPARK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 15 repeat orgs$227k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
18

Total granted

$1.2M
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
-15%

Still filing today

27%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CELL DOGS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $170k · revenue +41% · 30% of their budget
  • AH
    ALOHA HARVEST
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +22%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • HH
    HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -15%
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF WOODLAND HILLS
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -17% · 44% of their budget
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hawaii Pet Network Inc

The organization rescues unwanted, injured, and neglected animals and rehomes them into forever homes. the organization promotes the benefits or spaying & neutering pets, educates the community about the humane treatment of animals, and is…

—
2
Hospice Hawaii Inc

To promote the quality of life for persons facing life-limiting illnesses and for their families.

Human Services
3
Hawaii Public Radio

The mission of hawai'i public radio is to serve the people of hawai'i by informing with essential news, inspiring through the power of music and the arts, and connecting through conversations and convenings.

—
4
Hospice of Hilo

To improve the lives of those we touch by offering support, guidance and compassionate care of body, mind and spirit.

Human Services
5
Hawaii Organ Procurement Organization

The mission of legacy of life hawai'i is to save and enhance lives through recovering organs and tissue for transplant; encourage organ donation through community outreach and education; and honor and support organ donors and their families

Health
6
Hospice Maui Inc

To provide medical, nursing, counseling and other supportive services necessary for individuals with life-limiting illnesses and their families.

Human Services
7
Pacific Health Research & Education Institute

See schedule ophrei conducts health research and education that improves the health and well-being of veterans and all people in hawaii, central california, the pacific region, and throughout the u.s. driven by the values of excellence and…

—
8
Hawaiian Humane Society

The hawaiian humane society works to improve the welfare of animals through animal care, education, legislation, and prevention on the island of oahu. its mission is to promote the human-animal bond and the humane treatment of all animals.

Animals
9
Hawaii Island Humane Society Spca

The mission of the hawaii island humane society is to prevent cruelty to animals, eliminate pet over population, and enhance the bond between humans and animals.

Animals
10
Kapi'olani Health Foundation

The mission of kapi'olani health foundation is to create a healthier hawai'i.

Health
11
Ho'ola Lahui Hawaii

To improve the health and well-being of our community.

Human Services
12
Hospice of Holland Inc

The mission of hospice of holland is to provide the most compassionate and highest quality end-of-life care through physical, emotional, and spiritual support.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hoag Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Rotary Club of Woodland Hills. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUGS: $467,964 · OtherHUGSST MONICA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $137,050 · OtherST MONICA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $107,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIGBY MINISTRIES: $95,750 · OtherIGBY MINISTRIESCITY OF HOPE: $52,500 · Other+22 more: $296,550 · Other+22 moreCELL DOGS INC: $170,000 · Human ServicesCELL DOGS INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $20,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITI…HOSPICE OF KONA INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF KONA …+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesVoice of Orange CountyOrg: $37,500 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthALOHA HARVEST: $15,000 · Food & NutritionPAWS OF HAWAII: $5,000 · AnimalsI PADRINI DI ANTONELLOS: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,156,864Human Services$210,000Education$45,000Health$35,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Animals$5,000Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCELL DOGS INC: $170,000 over 8y, 30% of budgetVoice of Orange CountyOrg: $37,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF WOODLAND HILLS: $20,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALOHA HARVEST: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF KONA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESPARK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPAWS OF HAWAII: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CELL DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds Voice of Orange CountyOrg ↗
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF WOODLAND HILLS ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds ALOHA HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF KONA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LITTLE ANGELS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WESPARK INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS OF HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds I PADRINI DI ANTONELLOS ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Melinda Lee Meyer Charitable Trust CO Mark Eskander ESQ TrusteeCA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Melinda Lee Meyer Charitable Trust CO Mark Eskander ESQ Trustee · Edwin T & Eleanor L Meyer Charitable Tr · Jack A & Marilyn M Zuber Char Trust · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William Schampeau Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William Schampeau Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William Schampeau Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to William Schampeau Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William Schampeau’s filings →

    More from the funding graph