Skip to content

· Private foundation

William M Miller Tw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Environment$104kHuman Services$93kHealth$83kFood & Nutrition$45kArts & Culture$42kHousing & Shelter$37kReligion$32kCommunity Improvement$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$5,174
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION$25,000
REGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT$10,000
FRIENDS OF CORONADO$10,000
SHELTER CARE MINISTRIES$10,000
SWEDISH AMERICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,174
BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF$5,174
SECOND CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$5,174
EASTERN STAR MASONIC HOME$5,174
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS$5,174
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $14k → 15%YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $19k → 15%YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $15k → 15%YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $10k → 15%YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$501k · 14 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$501k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+76%

Still filing today

57%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RP
    ROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2025 · $104k · revenue +162%
  • YO
    YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $61k · revenue +56%
  • RA
    REGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $51k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS ATTN PAULA SCHMOLDT
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • ES
    EASTERN STAR MASONIC HOME ATTN GRAND TREASURER
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • BA
    BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Rockford Institute

To provide analysis and commentary on cultural, economic, political, and educational issues through a published monthly opinion magazine and to operate continuing adult educational conferences in american and european literature and…

—
2
Rockford Area Economic Development Council Inc

The rockford area economic development council cultivates opportunities for primary job growth that increase the economic well-being of our region

—
3
Rockford University

To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…

Education
4
Rockford Symphony Orchestra Foundation

Organization to build a permanent endowment for the benefit of the rockford symphony orchestra and its programs.

Philanthropy
5
Rockford Day Nursery

It is the mission of this corporation to provide quality care for children between the ages of six weeks and twelve years whose parents are employed or in training.

Human Services
6
Swedish Historical Society of Rockford

Preservation of swedish historical structure, culture and artifacts through the operations of a museum and cultural center.

Arts & Culture
7
Northern Illinois Blood Bank Inc D/B/a Rock River Valley Blood Center

Rock river valley blood center, in partnership with our community, is dedicated to providing safe, high value blood products and services to people in need.

Health
8
University of Wisconsin - River Falls Foundation Inc

An independent, not for profit wisconsin corporation, the uwrf foundation is organized solely for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-river falls. private giving to the foundation is essential in raising the level of excellence at…

Education
9
Racine Theatre Guild Inc

The theatrical productions of the racine theatre guild allow the local community the opportunity to participate in the theatrical experience.

Arts & Culture
10
Rockford Regional Health Council

Rockford regional health council is a not-for-profit social service corporation organized under the laws of the state of illinois for the purpose of improving community health through data gatering and analysis, education and advocacy.

—
11
Racine County Opportunity Center

Our focus is on making shortterm investments which will significantly improve the longterm wellbeing of our clients. we will measure our performance against these standards by continuously communicating with our clients, and will take…

Human Services
12
Rockford Community Investment Fund

To support housing and community development ventures

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockford Symphony Orchestras Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Coronado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC: $50,500 · OtherREGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INCSECOND CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $32,455 · OtherSECOND CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHBLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF: $28,894 · OtherBLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OFEastern Star Masonic Home: $28,894 · OtherEastern Star Masonic HomeTHE FRIENDS OF CORONADO FOUNDATION: $28,000 · OtherTHE FRIENDS OF CORONADO FOUNDATIONSHELTER CARE: $27,096 · OtherSHELTER CARESWEDISH AMERICAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $23,720 · OtherSWEDISH AMERICAN MEDICAL FOUNDATIONSwedishAmerican Health Foundation: $8,735 · Other+5 more: $17,196 · Other+5 moreROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $103,614 · EnvironmentROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT…YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $61,399 · Human ServicesYMCA OF ROCK …ANGELIC ORGANICS LEARNING CENTER INC: $44,688 · Food & NutritionANGELIC O…ROCKFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC: $25,507 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE CORONADO: $16,096 · Arts & CultureGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $21,096 · Youth DevelopmentSHELTER CARE MINISTRIES: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$245,490Environment$103,614Human Services$61,399Food & Nutrition$44,688Arts & Culture$41,603Youth Development$21,096Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $103,614 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetYMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $61,399 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetREGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC: $50,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetANGELIC ORGANICS LEARNING CENTER INC: $44,688 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetROCKFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC: $25,507 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $21,096 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CORONADO: $16,096 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSHELTER CARE MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSwedishAmerican Health Foundation: $8,735 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $3,561 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELIC ORGANICS LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CORONADO ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER CARE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SwedishAmerican Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern ILIL24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern IL · Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · Blazer Foundation · United Way of Rock River Valley · Guy Reno Family Foundation · The Kjellstrom Family Foundation · Smith Charitable Foundation Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx · Goddard Family Foundation · Ralph J Baudhuin Foundation · Midland States Bank Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William M Miller Tw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William M Miller Tw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William M Miller Tw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph