Skip to content

· Private foundation

William J Nicholson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$241kHealth$145kRecreation & Sports$115kHuman Services$104kScience & Tech$88kEducation$60kAnimals$56kYouth Development$56kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $99k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIDS READ NOW$30,000
MICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION$20,000
SIX FEET OVER$19,066
FISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY$10,000
THE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$10,000
MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER$10,000
MICHAEL'S PLACE$6,244
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$5,441
ELE'S PLACE$3,663
PEANUT GALLERY PLAYERS$805
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%HURON CLINTON METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY: $25k → 5%MICHAEL'S PLACE: $15k → 7%MICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%JOHN BALL ZOO: $25k → 11%ELE'S PLACE: $15k → 14%BINDER PARK ZOO: $11k → 14%THE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $25k → 16%MID MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $11k → 18%MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER: $30k → 21%KIDS READ NOW: $30k → 10%MICHAEL'S PLACE: $10k → 7%MICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%JOHN BALL ZOO: $10k → 11%ANN ARBOR HANDS ON MUSEUM: $20k → 14%THE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $20k → 16%MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER: $25k → 21%KIDS READ NOW: $20k → 10%MICHAEL'S PLACE: $10k → 7%MICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%JOHN BALL ZOO: $10k → 11%ELE'S PLACE: $10k → 14%THE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $13k → 16%DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $25k → 21%MICHAEL'S PLACE: $8k → 7%MICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%ANN ARBOR HANDS ON MUSEUM: $20k → 14%THE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $10k → 16%MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER: $13k → 21%MICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%ELE'S PLACE: $10k → 14%THE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $10k → 16%THE HENRY FORD: $20k → 21%MICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%ANN ARBOR HANDS ON MUSEUM: $15k → 14%THE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $9k → 16%MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER: $10k → 21%MICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $8k → 8%ELE'S PLACE: $8k → 14%THE HENRY FORD: $20k → 21%MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER: $10k → 21%FISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $15k → 7%TAKE ROOT: $15k → 8%THE HENRY FORD: $8k → 21%FISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $10k → 7%LYON TOWNSHIP: $75k → 8%PEANUT GALLERY PLAYERS: $9k → 8%LYON TOWNSHIP: $30k → 8%THE KIMBERLY ANN GILLARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of William J Nicholson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

William J Nicholson Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$859k · 18 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$859k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+17%

Still filing today

67%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $91k · revenue +178%
  • MS
    MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER
    5× · 2019–2024 · $88k · revenue +110%
  • TF
    THE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
    6× · 2019–2024 · $87k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • HM
    HURON-CLINTON METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +13%
  • Binder Park Zoological Society Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Legacy Art Park

Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.

Arts & Culture
2
Mount Pleasant Discovery Museum

To enhance the community by inspiring creativity, learning and curiosity.

Arts & Culture
3
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
4
The Childrens Museum of Siouxland Inc

Provide an interactive learning environment for children to foster imagination and creativity while inspiring life-long learning

Arts & Culture
5
Great Lakes Museum of Science Environment and Technology

Our mission is to make science, technology, engineering, and math (stem) come alive, and our vision is a community where all people value stem to inform decision making and enrich lives. (continued on schedule o)guiding principles: we help…

Science & Tech
6
Discovery World Ltd

Discovery World educates, motivates,mobilizes and inspires the innovators and entrepreneurs of the 21st century. We connect innovation, science, and technology with exploration, environment, and our Great Lakes freshwater resources through…

Education
7
The Great Lakes Childrens Museum

The museum celebrates learning through play. Exhibits and programs focus on developing self-direction, problem solving, logic and creativity skills in children (particularly ages 1-8) and their caregivers.

Arts & Culture
8
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
9
Museum School

The museum school celebrates, nurtures and enhances the ability of all participants through experimental, project-based learning. infusing the arts and utilizing resources available at local museums.

Education
10
Six Rivers Land Conservancy Fka Six Rivers Regional Land Conservancy

To conserve, sustain, and connect natural areas, land, and waters that make the places we live special

Environment
11
Museum of Discovery

To ignite and fuel a passion for science, technology, arts and math through dynamic interactive experiences.

Arts & Culture
12
Milwaukee Public Museum Inc

The milwaukee public museum inspires curiosity, excites minds and increases desire to preserve and protect our world's natural and cultural diversity through exhibitions, educational programs, collections and research.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-Michigan Children's Museum; the most unlike its peers is Six Feet Over. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $87,031 · Arts & CultureTHE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUMANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUM: $57,950 · Arts & CultureANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUMFISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $38,541 · Arts & CultureFISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIE…THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF AR…PEANUT GALLERY PLAYERS: $13,409 · Arts & CulturePEANUT GALLERY PLAYERSMID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $11,000 · Arts & CultureIndividual grant recipient: $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE HENRY FORD: $47,800 · OtherTHE HENRY FORDHURON-CLINTON METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY: $25,000 · OtherHURON-CLINTON METROPOLITAN…TAKE ROOT INC: $18,659 · OtherTAKE ROOT INCGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,503 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherMICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $90,937 · HealthMICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDAT…MICHAEL'S PLACE: $63,702 · HealthMICHAEL'S PLACESIX FEET OVER: $54,025 · HealthSIX FEET OVERKIMBERLY ANNE GILLARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthMICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER: $87,500 · EducationMICHIGAN SCIENCE…KIDS READ NOW INC: $49,985 · EducationKIDS READ NOW IN…JOHN BALL ZOO: $45,000 · AnimalsBinder Park Zoological Society Inc: $11,000 · AnimalsELE'S PLACE INC: $50,745 · Youth DevelopmentNeutral Zone: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentGRASS LAKE SANCTUARY: $20,400 · Religion
Arts & Culture$232,931Other$224,962Health$218,664Education$137,485Animals$56,000Youth Development$55,745Religion$20,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $90,937 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetMICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER: $87,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $87,031 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetMICHAEL'S PLACE: $63,702 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUM: $57,950 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSIX FEET OVER: $54,025 over 4y, 11% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $50,745 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetKIDS READ NOW INC: $49,985 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJOHN BALL ZOO: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $38,541 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRASS LAKE SANCTUARY: $20,400 over 4y, 14% of budgetPEANUT GALLERY PLAYERS: $13,409 over 4y, 11% of budgetBinder Park Zoological Society Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $11,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetKIMBERLY ANNE GILLARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetNeutral Zone: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MICHAEL'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds ANN ARBOR HANDS-ON MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SIX FEET OVER ↗
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS READ NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BALL ZOO ↗
  • Who funds FISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds GRASS LAKE SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds PEANUT GALLERY PLAYERS ↗
  • Who funds Binder Park Zoological Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds MID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds KIMBERLY ANNE GILLARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Neutral Zone ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy FoundationMI15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William J Nicholson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William J Nicholson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William J Nicholson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to William J Nicholson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William J Nicholson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph