Skip to content

· Private foundation

William Gano Houstoun Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$59kHuman Services$57kHealth$56kFood & Nutrition$55kEducation$43kRecreation & Sports$29kCrime & Legal$14kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$208k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CURE DUCHENNE$10,505
PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY$10,500
CC4C$5,000
ARMS OF HOPE-MEDINA CHILDREN'S HOME$5,000
CAMP FOR ALL$5,000
RED ARENA$5,000
CANDLELIGHT RANCH$4,000
YOUNG MEN'S BUSINESS LEAGUE$3,000
URBAN ROOTS$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $11k → 14%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $5k → 14%KIDS' MEALS: $3k → 16%KIDS' MEALS: $3k → 16%KIDS' MEALS: $3k → 16%KIDS' MEALS: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$312k · 18 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$312k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+17%

Still filing today

61%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Camp For All Foundation
    8× · 2018–2025 · $25k · revenue +325%
  • CR
    CANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $22k · revenue +101%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $14k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +16%
  • CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +17%
  • TL
    THE LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
3
Children and Youth Justice Center

The center for children & youth justice was founded in 2006 with one mission: reform the child welfare and juvenile justice systems to improve the lives of generations of children and youth in washington state. our focus is large-scale,…

Crime & Legal
4
Partners in Child Development Inc

To provide educational and therapeutic services, at a professional level, for infants, toddlers and preschool children up to 12 years and their families through supporting the family unit and working with each child to develop his or her…

Human Services
5
Childserve Inc

We partner with families to help children with special health care needs live a great life.

—
6
Camp Fire Central Texas

Camp Fire Central Texas builds caring, confident youth and future leaders through hands-on science, outdoor experiences, and service to the community.

—
7
FIRST3YEARS

First3years nurtures early relational and mental health of infants and toddlers in texas. working in deep collaboration with caregivers, parents, and professionals statewide, we cultivate strong early childhood systems, educate our…

—
8
Children's Developmental Center

The organization empowers familities and improves children's lives through comprehensive early intervention services, education, and therapeutic services. the organization primarily offers services to children from birth to three years…

Education
9
Yes Every Kid Inc

yes. every kid. is a leading advocacy team with a families-first approach to transform America's education policy landscape.

—
10
The Children's Place Inc

Provide mental health services to promote resiliency, wellness and positive developmental outcomes through prevention, treatment, education and family support for children under the age of 9 who have experienced abuse, neglect and other…

Crime & Legal
11
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
12
Collaborative for Children

The mission of Collaborative for Children is to meaningfully improve the quality of early childhood education and care for Greater Houston's children through those most influential in their lives.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Defense Fund; the most unlike its peers is Cure Duchenne. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARMS OF HOPE-MEDINA CHILDREN'S HOME: $38,000 · OtherARMS OF HOPE-MEDINA CHILDREN'S HOMEYOUNG MEN'S BUSINESS LEAGUE: $24,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S BUSINESS LEAGUESAN JUAN DIEGO CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $24,000 · OtherSAN JUAN DIEGO CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLHELPING HAND HOME OF AUSTIN: $11,000 · OtherHELPING HAND HOME OF AUSTINANY BABY CAN: $9,000 · OtherANY BABY CANREADING PARTNERS: $8,000 · OtherREADING PARTNERSFIRST TEE OF AUSTIN: $7,000 · OtherFIRST TEE OF AUSTINCC4C: $5,000 · OtherAUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS: $44,000 · Youth DevelopmentAUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY F…Camp For All Foundation: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentCamp For All FoundationCHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER…+1 more: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentCURE DUCHENNE: $30,771 · HealthCURE DUCHENNERED ARENA INC: $10,000 · HealthRED ARENA INCCANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION: $22,000 · Recreation & SportsCANDLELIGH…LONG GAME YOUTH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $8,000 · Recreation & SportsLONG GAME …THE PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC: $15,500 · Human ServicesTHE PAREN…KIDS' MEALS INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesKIDS' MEA…CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION: $14,000 · Crime & LegalYES Prep Public Schools Inc: $8,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERS: $3,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $2,000 · Civil Rights
Other$126,000Youth Development$76,000Health$40,771Recreation & Sports$30,000Human Services$26,500Crime & Legal$14,000Education$11,000Civil Rights$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS: $44,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCURE DUCHENNE: $30,771 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCamp For All Foundation: $25,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC: $15,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION: $14,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRED ARENA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLONG GAME YOUTH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYES Prep Public Schools Inc: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS ↗
  • Who funds CURE DUCHENNE ↗
  • Who funds Camp For All Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds RED ARENA INC ↗
  • Who funds LONG GAME YOUTH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds YES Prep Public Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William Gano Houstoun Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William Gano Houstoun Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William Gano Houstoun’s filings →

    More from the funding graph