· Private foundation
William G Stewart Family Fdn Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALL SAINTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $6,500 |
| ST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $6,000 |
| VALLEY'S PLANNING COUNCIL INC | $5,250 |
| NATIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| HELPING UP MISSION IN BALTIMORE | $2,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,550 |
| GILMAN CENTENNIAL SCHOLARSHIP | $2,500 |
| STEPHEN STILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FDN | $2,500 |
| JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES | $2,500 |
| AUSTIN DIAPER BANK | $2,500 |
| TUTORING PLUS OF CAMBRIDGE INC | $2,000 |
| SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS | $2,000 |
| MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC | $2,000 |
| POSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL | $1,500 |
| REACH BEYOND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
47 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GSGILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED8× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +45%
- PPPAUL'S PLACE INC5× · 2018–2022 · $38k · revenue +2%
- NPNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION8× · 2018–2025 · $27k · revenue +238%
Funded once
- KKKENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE INCone grant, 2017 · $5k
- STST THOMAS CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $4k
- CSCAMERON SCHOOL OF BUSINESSone grant, 2017 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gbmc Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds PAUL'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL CANCER SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds GARRISON FOREST SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds REACH BEYOND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN DIAPER BANK ↗
- Who funds WATERLOO GREENWAY CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds ISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds TUTORING PLUS OF CAMBRIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds POSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VILLA ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE UNION MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds THE CONTEMPORARY AUSTIN MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Buckingham School Frederick County Md · The Applied Materials Foundation · St David's Foundation · Better Business Bureau · The Powell Foundation · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization William G Stewart Family Fdn Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Beyond Domestic Violence Inc — 53% of income from government
- Postpartum Support International — 43% of income from government
- Paul's Place Inc — 29% of income from government
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Shriver Hall Concert Series Inc — 9% of income from government
- Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
- Rebuild Metro Inc — 5% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Health Care for the Homeless Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.