Skip to content

· Private foundation

William G Helis Chapter 310 Order of Ahepa Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$71k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$106kHealth$96kPublic Safety & Disaster$36kEnvironment$22kYouth Development$18kInternational$17kCrime & Legal$14kPhilanthropy$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENELOPE HOUSE$16,361
A SERVANTS' LOVE$10,000
VICTORY HEALTH PARTNERS$10,000
VIA CENTER$7,000
PRODISEE PANTRY$6,000
INTERNATIONAL ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES$5,000
PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETY$4,067
THE OZANAM CHARITABLE PHARMACY$4,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH ALABAMA$4,000
CASA MOBILE INC$3,000
COOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATION$1,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PRODISEE PANTRY: $8k → 12%THE OZANAM CHARITABLE PHARMACY: $4k → 19%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%INTERNATIONAL ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES: $5k → 11%PRODISEE PANTRY: $6k → 12%THE OZANAM CHARITABLE PHARMACY: $4k → 19%INTERNATIONAL ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES: $3k → 11%PRODISEE PANTRY: $6k → 12%THE OZANAM CHARITABLE PHARMACY: $4k → 19%FRIENDS OF THE HOGAR RAPHAEL AYAU: $4k → 14%INTERNATIONAL ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES: $3k → 11%PRODISEE PANTRY: $6k → 12%THE OZANAM CHARITABLE PHARMACY: $4k → 19%FRIENDS OF THE HOGAR RAPHAEL AYAU: $4k → 14%INTERNATIONAL ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES: $2k → 11%PRODISEE PANTRY: $3k → 12%THE OZANAM CHARITABLE PHARMACY: $3k → 19%PRODISEE PANTRY: $2k → 12%THE OZANAM CHARITABLE PHARMACY: $3k → 19%PRODISEE PANTRY: $2k → 12%THE OZANAM CHARITABLE PHARMACY: $3k → 19%PRODISEE PANTRY: $2k → 12%CASA MOBILE INC: $3k → 19%CASA MOBILE INC: $3k → 19%CASA MOBILE INC: $2k → 19%CASA MOBILE INC: $2k → 19%VIA CENTER: $7k → 19%VIA CENTER: $7k → 19%MITCHELL CANCER INSTITUTION: $5k → 19%PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETY: $4k → 19%PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETY: $4k → 19%VIA CENTER: $4k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $4k → 19%PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETY: $3k → 19%PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETY: $3k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $3k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $3k → 19%PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETY: $3k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $2k → 19%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $2k → 19%VICTORY HEALTH PARTNERS: $10k → 19%VICTORY HEALTH PARTNERS: $10k → 19%VICTORY HEALTH PARTNERS: $10k → 19%VICTORY HEALTH PARTNERS: $6k → 19%VICTORY HEALTH PARTNERS: $2k → 19%VICTORY HEALTH PARTNERS: $2k → 19%VICTORY HEALTH PARTNERS: $2k → 19%THE LEARNING TREE: $3k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$341k · 16 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$341k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+8%

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PENELOPE HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +26%
  • AS
    A SERVANTS LOVE INCORPORATED
    8× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +159%
  • VH
    Victory Health Partners Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • SA
    SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +8%
  • SL
    ST LUKE'S EPISCIPAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $658
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Plan a Health Inc

Founded in 2018, Plan A Health, Inc. (the Organization) is a Not-for-Profit that provides healthcare to underserved communities in the rural South. Their clinics serve all people, regardless of insurance status, income or location, and…

Health
2
Alabama Regional Medical Services

To provide quality healthcare and related services to all communities, including the underserved and homeless persons, regardless of language, culture, or financial barriers

Health
3
The Children's Hospital of Alabama

The mission of Children's of Alabama is to provide the finest pediatric health services to all children in an environment that fosters excellence in research and medical education. Children's will be an advocate for all children and work…

Health
4
Southeast Alabama Rural Health Associates

We exist to provide quality, culturally competent primary and preventive health services to the residents of southeast alabama without regard to their ability to pay.

Health
5
Siloam Health

Siloam shares the love of christ by providing affordable, whole-person care to the uninsured & underserved that addresses the physical, emotional, spiritual, & social determinants of health.

—
6
Caring Cross Inc

Caring cross is focused upon accelerating the development and implementation of advanced medicines like car-t cell and stem cell gene therapies. in partnership with like-minded stakeholders, caring cross develops and deploys technologies,…

Health
7
Good Samaritan Hospice Inc

It is the mission of good samaritan hospice to affirm life in the midst of illness and grief. we accomplish this objective by providing quality patient care, family support, community education and counseling services through an…

Health
8
La Clinica De La Raza Inc

To improve the quality of life of the diverse communities we serve by providing culturally appropriate, high quality, and accessible health care for all.

Health
9
Aids Alabama Inc

Aids alabama devotes its energy and resources statewide to helping people with hiv/aids live healthy, independent lives and works to prevent the spread of hiv.

Health
10
Cardea Health

Cardea health is a nonprofit healthcare organization founded to connect marginalized populations to the clinical and supportive services they need to improve their health, remain stably housed in their community, and age in place. cardea…

Human Services
11
Chattahoochee Hospice Inc

The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.

Human Services
12
Mali Health Organizing Project Inc

Mali Health improves maternal and child health by supporting women, communities, and the community health system to develop local solutions that ensure every mother and child has access to quality primary care. We aim to end preventable…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Hogar Rafael Ayau. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

A SERVANTS LOVE INCORPORATED: $43,000 · OtherA SERVANTS LOVE INCORPORATEDPHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETY: $22,205 · OtherPHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETYVIA CENTER: $19,500 · OtherVIA CENTERTHE LEARNING TREE INC: $9,350 · OtherTHE LEARNING TREE INCCOOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherCOOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $658 · OtherVictory Health Partners Inc: $43,000 · HealthVictory Health Partners I…Ozanam Charitable Pharmacy Inc: $23,000 · HealthOzanam Charitable Pharmac…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,200 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEAR…MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 · HealthPENELOPE HOUSE INC: $63,361 · Human ServicesPENELOPE HOUSE INCProdisee Pantry Inc: $35,620 · Public Safety & DisasterProdisee Pa…INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $17,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE HOGAR RAFAEL AYAU: $7,300 · InternationalBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentCASA MOBILE INC: $14,000 · Civil RightsSOUTH ALABAMA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION: $6,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHEAST ARKANSAS REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$107,713Health$78,200Human Services$63,361Public Safety & Disaster$35,620International$24,300Youth Development$17,500Civil Rights$14,000Community Improvement$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPENELOPE HOUSE INC: $63,361 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetA SERVANTS LOVE INCORPORATED: $43,000 over 8y, 9.6% of budgetVictory Health Partners Inc: $43,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetProdisee Pantry Inc: $35,620 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetOzanam Charitable Pharmacy Inc: $23,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $17,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $17,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCASA MOBILE INC: $14,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetTHE LEARNING TREE INC: $9,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HOGAR RAFAEL AYAU: $7,300 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSOUTH ALABAMA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST ARKANSAS REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PENELOPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds A SERVANTS LOVE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Victory Health Partners Inc ↗
  • Who funds Prodisee Pantry Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ozanam Charitable Pharmacy Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA MOBILE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEARNING TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds COOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HOGAR RAFAEL AYAU ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH ALABAMA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank TrusteeAL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Ws Foundation Inc Blacksher White-Spunner · Dog Hill Foundation · Mary J Larkins Charitable Foundation · The Moses Foundation · United Way of Southwest Alabama Inc · Nan H Altmayer Charitable Trust Regions Bank Trustee · As Mitchell Foundation Inc · J L Bedsole Foundation Regions Bank Co-Trustee · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William G Helis Chapter 310 Order of Ahepa Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William G Helis Chapter 310 Order of Ahepa Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William G Helis Chapter 310 Order of Ahepa Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to William G Helis Chapter 310 Order of Ahepa Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William G Helis Chapter 310 Order of Ahepa’s filings →

More from the funding graph