How much did WILLIAM F WELCH & grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 87% of WILLIAM F WELCH &’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k13 grants · $29k
$10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$50k–250k1 grant · $103k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

SHERIDAN COUNTY MEMORIAL$103,000
SHERIDAN SENIOR CENTER$15,000
WYO THEATRE INC$11,000
SHERIDAN COLLEGE$10,000
THE FOOD GROUP$5,000
SHERIDAN CO LIBRARY FND$5,000
HOLY NAME CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,500
DOWNTOWN SHERIDAN ASSOCIATION$3,000
KID'S LIFE$2,000
SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,500
CHAPS$1,500
CASA$1,000
WYOMING PUBLIC RADIO$1,000
SHERIDAN PUBLIC ARTS$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.3M · 25 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.3M

$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%

-11%

Still filing today

32%

21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Recreation & SportsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BC
BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION
3× · 2018–2022 · $55k · revenue +163%
SC
SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST
6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +442%
SC
SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL
2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +36%

Funded once

EN
EXTREMITY NERVE RESEARCH FND
one grant, 2018 · $20k
AB
ANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +77%
PA
PEOPLE ASSISTANCE FOOD BANK
one grant, 2024 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Sierra Watch

Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.

Environment

Sheboygan County Economic

The mission of the sheboygan county economic development corporation foundation, a countywide private/public partnership, is to lead diversified economic & community development efforts in order to improve the long term prosperity of the…

Community Improvement

Sheridan County Young Mens

Sheridan county men's chrisian association(YMCA)is a charitable community service organization that includes men, women and children of all ages, abilities, income, races and religions. We are dedicated to strengthening our communities.…

Human Services

Sheboygan County Historical Research Centerinc

The sheboygan county historical research center serves the public by collecting, preserving and making available the written documentation and images of sheboygan county.

—

Shelby County Chamber of Commerce Inc

We advocate for business growth and support the success of our members while collaborating with partners to promote shelby county as a highly desirable community in which to live, work, and play.

—

Sheridan Recreation District

The organization's mission is to support the activities and programs of the sheridan recreation district

Recreation & Sports

Crested Butte Land Trust

The mission of the crested butte land trust is to forever protect and steward open lands for vistas, recreation, wildlife and ranching, thus contributing to the preservation of gunnison countys unique heritage and quality of life

Environment

Sheridan County Historical Society

The mission shall be to bring together those people interested in history and especially the history of sheridan county, ks. understanding the history of our community is basic to our democratic way of life, gives us a better understanding…

Arts & Culture

Sheridan Golf Club Inc

Provide and maintain a recreational facility for members

Recreation & Sports

Wyoming Wildlife Federation

Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.

Animals

Sheridan County Historical Society

Preserve and share our rich heritage, engaging present and future generations.

Arts & Culture

Butte Local Development Corporation

To promote economic development in the area

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Volunteers of America Northern Rockies and the most unlike its peers is Antelope Butte Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/12

Grantees still filing

7/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,186,100Arts & Culture$106,000Community Improvement$13,000Environment$12,000Recreation & Sports$12,000Human Services$10,000Health$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott FoundationWY22.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · Joe and Arlene Watt Foundation Inc · Wyoming Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation · The Roberts Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Joe F and Roberta Napier Foundation · Bf & Rose H Perkins Foundation · Homer A Jr & Janet Scott Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation WILLIAM F WELCH & funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WYO THEATRE INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~7 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 742254851 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WYO THEATRE INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to William F Welch &?

Find your warmest path to William F Welch & through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

WILLIAM F WELCH &

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to William F Welch &?

More from the funding graph

WILLIAM F WELCH &

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to William F Welch &?

More from the funding graph