· Private foundation
First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k644 grants · $1.6M
- $10k–50k116 grants · $2.3M
- $50k–250k6 grants · $437k
- $250k+1 grant · $663k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Blackbaud Giving Fund | $663,178 |
| YELLOWSTONE ICE FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC | $103,000 |
| WHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $59,490 |
| RIVERPEAK HEALTH | $50,000 |
| Billings School District | $50,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH DAKOTA | $50,000 |
| WISE WONDERS CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC | $40,245 |
| E4E RELIEF LLC | $38,713 |
| FOUR BANDS COMMUNITY FUND INC | $37,500 |
| IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $36,000 |
| FEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA | $35,500 |
| MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY | $32,500 |
| COMMUNITY ENTRY SERVICES INC | $32,500 |
| ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH INC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
1152 repeat relationships — 469 still active in FY2025, 683 since wound down; 174 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC6× · 2020–2025 · $526k · revenue +19%
- LWLEADERSHIP WYOMING6× · 2020–2025 · $245k · revenue +240%
- MFMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC6× · 2020–2025 · $189k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- CVCobre Valley Hospitalone grant, 2022 · $75k
- BCBOULDER COUNTY RSVP BOARD INC dba CULTIVATEone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -4%
- CCCARE CORPS' LIFEHOUSEone grant, 2022 · $27k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enhance community vitality by inspiring community giving and strengthening nonprofits
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
To build a strong community food system that fosters socially just ways of accessing food
Providing safe, decent & affordable housing opportunities.
To strengthen families in our communities by offering opportunities in education, housing, health, employment and legal services.
Medical, dental, and mental health services for low income, uninsured, and underinsured patients in the missoula, montana region.
To connect people who care with causes that matter.
Collaboration and advocacy for the five feeding america food banks in co and wy.
Distributing donated and purchased food to low-income households and homeless individuals.
We promote independence and an enhanced quality of life for adults with serious mental illness.
Supporting sustainable business growth and quality job creation throughout missoula county.
Providing food to needy families in the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Black Hills Area Community and the most unlike its peers is Lifescape. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1482 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1482 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC ↗
- Who funds WHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP WYOMING ↗
- Who funds MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds E4E RELIEF LLC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds Montana State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP & DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds NETWORK FOR TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP MONTANA INC ↗
- Who funds FOUR BANDS COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE BLACK HILLS ↗
- Who funds TUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds YELLOWSTONE ICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds GREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA ↗
- Who funds HELENA FOOD SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds PLENTY DOORS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MONTANA COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds THRIVE INC ↗
- Who funds MONTANA RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MONTANA NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds MONTANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONTANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds Helping Hands in Hardin Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Sample Foundation Inc · Treacy Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations dba Wyoming Nonprofit Network · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · Headwaters Health Foundation of Western Montana · United Way of Deschutes County · Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Neighborimpact — 68% of income from government
- Mountainstar Family Relief Nursery — 60% of income from government
- Project Patchwork — 44% of income from government
- The Family Nurturing Center Rogue Valley Children's Relief Nursery — 38% of income from government
- Heart of Oregon Corps Inc — 28% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Bend Inc — 16% of income from government
- United Way of Jackson County Inc — 11% of income from government
- High Desert Museum — 11% of income from government
- Healing Reins Equine Assisted Services Inc — 11% of income from government
- Mosaic Community Health — 8% of income from government
- Nonprofit Association of Oregon — 6% of income from government
- Food for Lane County — 5% of income from government
- Volunteers in Medicine Clinic of the Cascades — 3% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program — 2% of income from government
- Josephine County Food Bank — 1% of income from government
- Casa of Jackson County Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.