Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

William and Nancy Anixter Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Animals$28kHealth$28kYouth Development$25kHuman Services$19kReligion$14kEnvironment$13kArts & Culture$10kPhilanthropy$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$3,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$502k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$12,000
HALO ANIMAL RESCUE$6,000
HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY$5,000
LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO$3,500
OUTPOST PRODUCTIONS$1,000
TAOS SCHOOL OF MUSIC$1,000
BRIDGES PROJECT$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO: $7k → 14%LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO: $4k → 14%LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO: $4k → 14%LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO: $3k → 14%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $10k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $10k → 11%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $250 → 14%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
CA
AZ
NM
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$109k · 10 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$109k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

70%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentReligionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    Hospice of the Valley
    4× · 2022–2025 · $28k · revenue +14%
  • HH
    HALO HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +22%
  • LP
    LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $17k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +253%
  • IC
    IMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISH
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • LP
    LA PALZA DE ENCUENTRO
    one grant, 2021 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lodestar Charitable Foundation

To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.

2
Habitat for Humanity of Orange County Inc

Habitat for humanity's mission is to give witness to the christian gospel by working with god's people to build decent habitats for those who are inadequately sheltered in orange county.

3
The Arizona Pet Project

The arizona pet project creates systemic change and provides resources, so no families are forced to balance their own basic needs of food, shelter, and safety and the needs of their companion animals, often the only meaningful connection…

Animals
4
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
5
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
6
Foundation for Financial Planning Inc

Our mission is to help people in need improve their financial lives by expanding access to pro bono financial planning.

Human Services
7
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
8
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
9
La Plata County Humane Society

Animal shelter, spay & neuter, humane treatment of animals.

Animals
10
Avivo

Avivo increases well-being through recovery and career advancement while working to end homelessness.

Human Services
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

12
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Valley and the most unlike its peers is Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Hospice of the Valley — $28,000 · Human ServicesHospice of the ValleyLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE — $17,000 · Human ServicesLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLA…+1 more — $250 · Human ServicesPROJECT OSMOSIS — $12,000 · OtherPROJECT OSMOSISBOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $12,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBALIVE COVENANT CHURCH — $7,000 · OtherALIVE COVENANT CHURCHIMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISH — $2,500 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISHLA PALZA DE ENCUENTRO — $2,500 · OtherLA PALZA DE ENCUENTROST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,500 · Other+7 more — $4,050 · Other+7 moreHALO HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INC — $24,500 · AnimalsHALO HELPING ANIMALS L…THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER & MONROE COUNTY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO — $2,500 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF …HOPE FOR PAWS — $1,000 · AnimalsBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC — $12,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GI…RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $4,000 · Arts & CultureOUTPOST PRODUCTIONS INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureTAOS SCHOOL OF MUSIC INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $1,800 · PhilanthropyHighland Park Community Foundation — $250 · PhilanthropyPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION — $2,750 · ReligionPUGET SOUND RESTORATION FUND — $1,000 · Environment
Human Services$45,250Other$43,550Animals$28,000Youth Development$12,500Arts & Culture$7,000Philanthropy$4,050Religion$2,750Environment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHospice of the Valley — $28,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHALO HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INC — $24,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE — $17,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION — $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER & MONROE COUNTY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUTPOST PRODUCTIONS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR PAWS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUGET SOUND RESTORATION FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHighland Park Community Foundation — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization William and Nancy Anixter Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph