Skip to content

· Private foundation

William & Margaret Kang Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$75kReligion$46kCivil Rights$14kScience & Tech$5kArts & Culture$5kFood & Nutrition$4kInternational$4kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$764k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WHITMAN COLLEGE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FRONTIERS USA$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
WE ARE FAMILY FOUNDATION$3,000
FOR THE MANY$2,500
SAINT ANN'S SCHOOL$2,500
JAMAL JACKSON DANCE COMPANY$1,500
ALL GOOD LIVING FOUNDATION$1,000
GEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL$1,000
TOYS FOR TOTS$1,000
ALAMEDA FOOD BANK$500
ASIAN AMERICAN ARTS ALLIANCE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ALL GOOD LIVING FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%HOLLABACK: $1k → 20%ALL GOOD LIVING FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%ALL GOOD LIVING FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%ALL GOOD LIVING FOUNDATION: $750 → 10%ALL GOOD LIVING FOUNDATION: $750 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OH
CA
UT
VA
AZ
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of William & Margaret Kang Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 58% of the giving stays in WA; by stated purpose, 53%.

William & Margaret Kang Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$130k · 21 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
30

Total granted

$130k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+21%

Still filing today

43%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WE ARE FAMILY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $14k · revenue +63%
  • BO
    BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +63%
  • AG
    ALL GOOD LIVING FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +463%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • PN
    PUKYONG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
2
Mark Day School

Innovative and full of heart, mark day school nurtures each child to pursue their curiosity, think critically, embrace challenge with courage and joy, and work in partnership with others to build more caring and inclusive communities.

—
3
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
4
Taipei American School Foundation

Taipei american school's mission is to cultivate an enduring commitment to learning, personal well-being, and service. tas provides a broad american-based education with a global perspective that develops students of character who are…

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Westside Neighborhood School

Wns is committed to creating a deeply caring community of lifelong learners that nurtures students from diverse backgrounds to reach their full potential, develop cultural competency, and inspire the world with their curiosity, innovation,…

Education
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
Global Citizens Public Charter School

Global citizens school's mission is to inspire and prepare the next generation or global citizens. we will do this by supporting students, ages 3-11, to reach their full academic and leadership potential in a nurturing learning…

—
12
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is La-Mas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF SEATT: $24,050 · OtherUNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF SEATTIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPUKYONG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherPUKYONG NATIONAL UNIVERSITYUNITED SEATTLE-BELLEVUE KOR SCHOOL: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · Other+33 more: $66,095 · Other+33 moreBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE: $12,500 · EducationBOARD OF T…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTE…SAINT ANN'S SCHOOL: $4,000 · EducationSAINT ANN'…GEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $150 · EducationWE ARE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $14,000 · Civil RightsMIO Frontiers: $11,000 · ReligionALL GOOD LIVING FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesRIGHT TO BE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $1,600 · Food & NutritionALAMEDA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,200 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $800 · Food & NutritionEquality Now Inc: $2,000 · InternationalJERUSALEM UNIVERSITY COLLEGE: $1,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $500 · International
Other$172,645Education$21,650Civil Rights$14,000Religion$11,000Human Services$5,500Food & Nutrition$3,600International$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWE ARE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIO Frontiers: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALL GOOD LIVING FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT ANN'S SCHOOL: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEquality Now Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA-MAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJERUSALEM UNIVERSITY COLLEGE: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRIGHT TO BE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST PAUL'S DAY SCHOOL OF OAKLAND DBA ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES ADVOCACY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOREANAMERICANSTORYORG INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTeam Read: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WE ARE FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MIO Frontiers ↗
  • Who funds ALL GOOD LIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds SAINT ANN'S SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Equality Now Inc ↗
  • Who funds Alameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN ARTS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William & Margaret Kang Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William & Margaret Kang Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William & Margaret Kang’s filings →

    More from the funding graph