Skip to content

· Private foundation

William & Louise Owens Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$414kReligion$244kHealth$71kInternational$51kHuman Services$38kHousing & Shelter$32kArts & Culture$28kScience & Tech$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $104k
$3,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHITEFIELD ACADEMY$54,000
COMMUNITY BIBLE CHURCH$50,000
ATLANTA YOUTH ACADEMY$15,000
CUMBERLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH$15,000
SAMFORD UNIVERSITY$10,000
BLUE RIDGE FREE DENTAL CLINIC$10,000
WESTMINSTER SCHOOL AT OAK MOUNTAIN$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
ALPHA DELTA PI FOUNDATION$9,000
NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM$5,000
GRACE POINT SCHOOL$5,000
BLANKET FORT HOPE$4,000
LIFELINE CHILDREN SERVICES$3,000
ENTER THE LION$3,000
NEVERTHIRST$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BLANKET FORT HOPE: $8k → 7%BLANKET FORT HOPE: $7k → 7%BLANKET FORT HOPE: $6k → 7%BLANKET FORT HOPE: $6k → 7%BLANKET FORT HOPE: $5k → 7%BLANKET FORT HOPE: $4k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
CA
NE
MO
WV
VA
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 32 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
13

Total granted

$1.1M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+27%

Still filing today

41%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHealthHuman ServicesScience & TechPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WHITEFIELD ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $154k · revenue +81%
  • GS
    GRACEPOINT SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $119k · revenue +87%
  • Samford University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • GS
    Georgia State University Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +189%
  • LC
    LEGACY COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
2
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
5
Reformed Theological Seminary

Reformed theological seminary (rts) exists to glorify the triune god and to serve his church in all branches of evangelical christianity, especially presbyterian and reformed churches, by providing reformed graduate theological education…

Education
6
Dallas Theological Seminary

The mission of Dallas Theological Seminary is to glorify God by equipping godly servant-leaders for the proclamation of His Word and the building up of the body of Christ worldwide.

Education
7
Winebrenner Theological Seminary

Winebrenner theological seminary equips leaders for service in god's kingdom.

Education
8
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
9
Bluefield University

To offer a challenging christ-centered liberal arts experience and co-curricular programs that transform students' lives by integrating liberal arts with career-oriented studies and service to god & the world.

Education
10
Wesley Biblical Seminary

Wesley biblical seminary is a multi-denominational school of theology that provides undergraduate, graduate and doctorate level education for individuals who are preparing for christian service.

Education
11
Welch College

Welch college is a christian higher education institution that educates leaders to serve christ, his church, and his world through biblical thought and life

Education
12
Bethel University

We educate and equip students to lead lives of impact through transformative academics in a christ-centered community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nema Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gracepoint School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY BIBLE CHURCH INC: $239,300 · OtherCOMMUNITY BIBLE CHURCH INCWHITEFIELD ACADEMY INC: $154,000 · OtherWHITEFIELD ACADEMY INCATLANTA YOUTH ACADEMY: $93,600 · OtherATLANTA YOUTH ACADEMY+35 more: $286,699 · Other+35 moreGRACEPOINT SCHOOL INC: $119,000 · EducationGRACEPOINT SCHOOL INCSamford University: $75,000 · EducationSamford UniversityGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $25,000 · EducationGeorgia State Univers…+1 more: $2,000 · EducationBLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC: $70,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthNEVERTHIRST INC: $45,000 · InternationalBLANKET FORT HOPE: $36,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesENTER THE LION: $8,000 · ReligionJULIES DREAM INC: $3,000 · ReligionREASONS TO BELIEVE: $1,500 · ReligionVILLA INTERNATIONAL ATLANTA INC: $1,000 · ReligionTHE ABLEGAMERS FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · Science & Tech
Other$773,599Education$221,000Health$71,000International$45,000Human Services$36,500Religion$13,500Science & Tech$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHITEFIELD ACADEMY INC: $154,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGRACEPOINT SCHOOL INC: $119,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetSamford University: $75,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC: $70,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetNEVERTHIRST INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBLANKET FORT HOPE: $36,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALPHA DELTA PI FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN HOSPICE & HOPE HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetENTER THE LION: $8,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetTHE ABLEGAMERS FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJULIES DREAM INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLeadership Ministries Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBRENAU UNIVERSITY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREASONS TO BELIEVE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEMA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLA INTERNATIONAL ATLANTA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoth Hands Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHITEFIELD ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACEPOINT SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Samford University ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEVERTHIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds BLANKET FORT HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Georgia State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA DELTA PI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN HOSPICE & HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ENTER THE LION ↗
  • Who funds THE ABLEGAMERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JULIES DREAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRENAU UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds REASONS TO BELIEVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL17.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Servant Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William & Louise Owens Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William & Louise Owens Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William & Louise Owens’ filings →

    More from the funding graph