Skip to content

· Private foundation

William and Karla Laux Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$32kReligion$31kRecreation & Sports$10kHealth$7kHuman Services$3kHousing & Shelter$200Animals$200
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$100
Median grant
7
States reached
$200k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOSEPH SCHOOL$10,000
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF SAINT CECILIA$1,000
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY$1,000
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$500
URSULINE SISTERS OF CLEVELAND$100
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$100
MAKE-A-WISH$100
SORROWFUL MOTHER SHRINE$100
BIRTHCARE OF MEDINA COUNTY$100
CROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH$100
LIVING BREAD RADIO$100
SISTERS OF ST BENEDICT$100
ETERNAL WORLD TELEVISION NETWORK$100
OAKS FAMILY CARE CENTER$100
THE CHILDRENS CENTER OF MEDINA COUNTY$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 17%AG COMMUNITY RELIEF: $100 → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $500 → 9%HANDS ACROSS MEDINA COUNTY FOUNDATION: $100 → 7%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $500 → 9%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $50 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
TN
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$76k · 18 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$76k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+26%

Still filing today

56%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $700 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthReligionAnimalsHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MONROEVILLE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +125%
  • GE
    GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $4k · revenue +72%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $3k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • US
    URSULINE SISTERS
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • MS
    MERCEDARIAN SISTERS OF THE BLESSED SACRAMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Human Services Inc

Catholic human services inc. enhances the lives of those we serve by providing hope-filled social, emotional and spiritual support to all people.

Human Services
2
Care Net Pregnancy Center of Milwaukee Inc

To support the sanctity of human life and to share the love of christ and the hope of the gospel with women facing an unexpected pregnancy.

Health
3
Catholic Pregnancy Help Center Inc Dba Loving Choice

Our mission is to provide spiritual, emotional, educational and material support to expectant mothers and fathers who are faced with an un-planned pregnancy so they may successfully carry their babies to term, based on catholic social and…

Human Services
4
Heart of Christ Clinic

To carry out the healing ministry of jesus christ by providing comprehensive primary medical and health care, recognizing the religious conscience protections of the individuals providing and receiving such care, focused on the health and…

Religion
5
Cathedral Center Inc

Cathedral center's mission is to provide a safe environment for women and families, while working to end homelessness one life at a time. the cathedral center serves unaccompanied women and families with children who are homeless or…

Religion
6
Catholic Comfort Care Homes

To provide temporary housing and care

Human Services
7
Catholic Center Retreat House

As a catholic ministry in the diocese of lincoln, our mission is to provide a sanctuary and experience which leads people to encounter jesus christ. through inspiring retreats and warm hospitality, we seek to transform and renew the…

—
8
Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio

Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio serves and empowers people through God's love in their times of vulnerability. We do so through a full range of local services that engage the community in building solidarity.

Human Services
9
Catholic Family Service

Counseling individuals and families and foster care services.

—
10
Visitation House Inc

Grounded in the gospel and in the culture of life of the catholic church, visition house is a home that welcomes women in crisis pregnancies in the spirit of elizabeth, who welcomed her cousin the virgin mary with awe-filled joy and true…

Human Services
11
Menominee Animal Shelter Inc

Caring for stray cats and dogs.

Animals
12
Choices for Victims of Domestic Violence

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 40 Days for Life; the most unlike its peers is Michigan Ag Community Wildfire Relief Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPH SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherST JOSEPH SCHOOLOUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH: $15,200 · OtherOUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCHST JOSEPH CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $12,000 · OtherST JOSEPH CATHOLIC SCHOOLMONROEVILLE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $10,000 · OtherMONROEVILLE ATHLETIC BOOSTERSDOMINICAN SISTERS OF SAINT CECILIA: $3,000 · OtherDOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY: $3,000 · Other+19 more: $9,980 · Other+19 moreGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $200 · Human Services+3 more: $250 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,600 · HealthCORNERSTONE PREGNANCY SERVICES: $200 · HealthOAKS FAMILY CARE CENTER INC: $1,700 · Housing & Shelter40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $240 · EducationLiving Bread Radio Inc: $100 · ReligionETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $100 · ReligionTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF MEDINA COUNTY: $150 · Crime & LegalSAVE OHIO STRAYS: $50 · AnimalsSTAY-A-WHILE CAT SHELTER INC: $50 · Animals
Other$73,180Human Services$4,450Health$2,800Housing & Shelter$1,700Education$240Religion$200Crime & Legal$150Animals$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONROEVILLE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $10,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOAKS FAMILY CARE CENTER INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLoyola Retreat House Inc: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $240 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE PREGNANCY SERVICES: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHCARE OF MEDINA COUNTY INC: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF MEDINA COUNTY: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Bread Radio Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR HANDICAPPED CITIZENS OF MEDINA COUNTY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE OHIO STRAYS: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAY-A-WHILE CAT SHELTER INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONROEVILLE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds OAKS FAMILY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Loyola Retreat House Inc ↗
  • Who funds 40 DAYS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE PREGNANCY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHCARE OF MEDINA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF MEDINA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Hands Across Medina County Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Living Bread Radio Inc ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN AG COMMUNITY WILDFIRE RELIEF FUND ↗
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR HANDICAPPED CITIZENS OF MEDINA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE OHIO STRAYS ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds STAY-A-WHILE CAT SHELTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community FoundationOH19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William and Karla Laux Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William and Karla Laux Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William and Karla Laux’s filings →

    More from the funding graph