Skip to content

· Private foundation

William and Gertrude Shelley Family

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$338kEducation$252kArts & Culture$155kAnimals$88kHuman Services$55kHousing & Shelter$43kEnvironment$28kFood & Nutrition$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $105k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP TAKUMTA$25,000
FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION$20,000
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$20,000
THE MERRYMAC FARM SANCTUARY$10,000
PREECLAMPSIA FOUNDATION$10,000
AUNT DOT'S PLACE$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$10,000
LAURA'S HOUSE$5,000
FRIENDS OF ORANGE COUNTY'S HOMELESS PETS$5,000
MARCH OF DIMES$5,000
HOMEWARD BOUND$5,000
CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION$5,000
LIVE LOVE ANIMAL RESCUE$5,000
ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE$3,000
DORSET EQUINE RESCUE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $1k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $1k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $1k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $5k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $5k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
NY
MA
NJ
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$991k · 33 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
14

Total granted

$991k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
-18%

Still filing today

79%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    VERMONTS CAMP TA-KUM-TA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $185k · revenue +15%
  • MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $140k · revenue +5%
  • TF
    THE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $140k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • SF
    STOREYBROOK FARM SANCTUARY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -18%
  • U
    USCRI
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • LR
    Little Red Dog Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
2
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
3
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
4
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
5
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
6
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
7
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
8
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
9
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
10
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
11
Animal Rescue League of Boston

The animal rescue league of boston's vision is to confront animal cruelty and neglect at its root causes. through programs, services, and facilities focused on accessible animal care, public advocacy, and sustained anti-cruelty efforts...…

Animals
12
A Just World

Our mission is to promote a world where all beings live a just life of dignity and respect. To this end, we engage in practical actions, raise funds, spread understanding and foster compassion.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Orange Countys Homeless Pets. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
18/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VERMONTS CAMP TA-KUM-TA: $185,000 · HealthVERMONTS CAMP TA-KUM-TAPREECLAMPSIA FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · HealthPREECLAMPSIA FOUNDATION INCNAMI National: $42,000 · HealthNAMI NationalMARCH OF DIMES INC: $24,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC+3 more: $14,000 · HealthTHE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION: $140,000 · EducationTHE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOU…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $70,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON F…CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION: $29,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDA…+1 more: $7,500 · EducationAUNT DOT'S PLACE CO KITTY DALY: $30,000 · OtherAUNT DOT'S PLACE CO KI…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $24,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEU N HIGH COUNCIL ON REFUGESS: $22,000 · OtherU N HIGH COUNCIL ON RE…ST JUDE'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherST JUDE'S RESEARCH FOU…Individual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recip…LIVE LOVE ANIMAL SERVICES INC: $15,000 · OtherLIVE LOVE ANIMAL SERVI…HOMEWARD BOUND: $7,000 · OtherLAURA'S HOUSE: $18,000 · OtherLAURA'S HOUSEOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $15,000 · OtherOrange County Rescue M…+13 more: $40,500 · Other+13 moreMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $140,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FINE A…FLYNN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS LTD: $12,000 · Arts & CultureFLYNN CENTER FOR…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMerrymac Farm Sanctuary Incorporated: $20,000 · AnimalsSTOREYBROOK FARM SANCTUARY INC: $10,000 · AnimalsANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $9,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $6,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · AnimalsLittle Red Dog Inc: $5,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF ORANGE COUNTYS HOMELESS PETS: $5,000 · AnimalsThe Dorset Equine Rescue Inc: $3,000 · Animals+1 more: $2,000 · AnimalsAunt Dot's Place Inc: $20,000 · Food & NutritionVERMONT FOODBANK: $8,000 · Food & NutritionNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentLLOYD CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentDARTMOUTH NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST INC: $2,000 · Environment
Health$325,000Education$246,500Other$207,500Arts & Culture$153,000Animals$66,000Food & Nutrition$28,000Environment$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVERMONTS CAMP TA-KUM-TA: $185,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $140,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPREECLAMPSIA FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNAMI National: $42,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION: $29,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMerrymac Farm Sanctuary Incorporated: $20,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAunt Dot's Place Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLAURA'S HOUSE: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLIVE LOVE ANIMAL SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFLYNN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS LTD: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTOREYBROOK FARM SANCTUARY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWE NEED DIVERSE BOOKS: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Red Dog Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF ORANGE COUNTYS HOMELESS PETS: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley Conservation Land Trust Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetJAMBOREE HOUSING CORPORATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Dorset Equine Rescue Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLLOYD CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDARTMOUTH NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetART WITH IMPACT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VERMONTS CAMP TA-KUM-TA ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PREECLAMPSIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds Merrymac Farm Sanctuary Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Aunt Dot's Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAURA'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LIVE LOVE ANIMAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLYNN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS LTD ↗
  • Who funds STOREYBROOK FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds WE NEED DIVERSE BOOKS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Little Red Dog Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ORANGE COUNTYS HOMELESS PETS ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Wellesley Conservation Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds JAMBOREE HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds The Dorset Equine Rescue Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Life Group Charitable Foundation IncVT15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · Antonio B and Rita M Pomerleau Foundation Inc · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · The Vermont Community Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William and Gertrude Shelley Family funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William and Gertrude Shelley Family. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
  • Preeclampsia Foundation Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Lloyd Center for the Environment Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Flynn Center for the Performing Arts Ltd: 0% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William and Gertrude Shelley Family?

Find your warmest path to William and Gertrude Shelley Family through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William and Gertrude Shelley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph