Skip to content

· Private foundation

William and Evelyn Fuchs Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.2MEducation$395kAnimals$70kEnvironment$50kFood & Nutrition$43kPublic Benefit$40kArts & Culture$28kYouth Development$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $235k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$10.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO CANCER$130,000
Individual grant recipient$55,000
TRELLUS OPPORTUNITIES FOR LIFE$50,000
RAVINA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION$25,000
ROBERT SHIELDS MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
ELMHURST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
TIMOTHY CHRTISTIAN SCHOOL$12,500
ALPORT SYNDROME FOUNDATION$10,000
WEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MONTINI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
HEART HEAVEN OUTREACH$10,000
NATIONAL LEWIS UNIVERSITY$7,000
NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL BETTERMENT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $1k → 14%HANOVER TOWNSHIP FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%HANOVER TOWNSHIP FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%HANOVER TOWNSHIP FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%HANOVER TOWNSHIP FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%HANOVER TOWNSHIP FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 28 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
5

Total granted

$2.2M
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+21%

Still filing today

43%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    CHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2023 · $150k · revenue +2%
  • OB
    OPEN BOOKS LTD
    3× · 2021–2023 · $125k · revenue +5%
  • NL
    National Louis University
    4× · 2022–2025 · $76k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • EW
    EXODUS WORLD SERVICEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +28%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +17%
  • IC
    IC CATHOLIC PREP HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Waldorf School

Providing and promoting waldorf education from early childhood through the twelfth grade and promoting waldorf education through community outreach.

Education
2
Thrive Chicago Nfp

Thrive chicago's mission is to prepare chicago's youth for a vibrant future by aligning efforts and outcomes from cradle to career.

Human Services
3
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
4
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
5
Legal Aid Chicago

At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…

Crime & Legal
6
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
7
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
8
Academy for Global Citizenship Charter School

Academy for global citizenship charter school (agc) develops mindful leaders who take action both now and in the future to positively impact their communities and the world beyond.

Education
9
Chicago Jewish Day School

Cjds creates for its students a standard of excellence in both jewish and general studies. students develop a passion for learning and a strong sense of themselves as jews and as human beings. students are inspired to develop a strong…

Education
10
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
11
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
12
Daniel Murphy Scholarship Fund

The mission of the daniel murphy scholarship fund is to give high school scholarship assistance and educational support to chicago students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. the fund seeks to make a life-altering difference in…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cradles to Crayons Inc; the most unlike its peers is Heart Haven Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO CANCER: $710,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO CANCERIndividual grant recipient: $305,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientROBERT SHIELDS MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP: $100,000 · OtherROBERT SHIELDS MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIPELMHURST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherELMHURST HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTRELLUS OPPORTUNITIES FOR LIFE: $100,000 · OtherTRELLUS OPPORTUNITIES FOR LIFEIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · Other+18 more: $236,375 · Other+18 moreCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL: $150,000 · EducationCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOLOPEN BOOKS LTD: $125,000 · EducationOPEN BOOKS LTDNational Louis University: $75,500 · EducationNational Louis Univer…CIVIC LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationCIVIC LEADERSHIP FOUN…COLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION: $34,500 · EducationCOLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOU…WEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $59,500 · AnimalsTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $50,000 · EnvironmentRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $28,000 · Arts & CultureELMHURST-YORKFIELD FOOD PANTRY: $11,125 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionHEART HAVEN OUTREACH: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,631,375Education$425,000Animals$59,500Environment$50,000Arts & Culture$28,000Food & Nutrition$21,125Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL: $150,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetOPEN BOOKS LTD: $125,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetNational Louis University: $75,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $59,500 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCIVIC LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetTIMOTHY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION: $34,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $28,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEART HAVEN OUTREACH: $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetEXODUS WORLD SERVICE: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetELMHURST-YORKFIELD FOOD PANTRY: $11,125 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHanover Township Foundation: $11,125 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds OPEN BOOKS LTD ↗
  • Who funds National Louis University ↗
  • Who funds WEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE MORTON ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds CIVIC LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TIMOTHY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HEART HAVEN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds EXODUS WORLD SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds ELMHURST-YORKFIELD FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds Hanover Township Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds ALPORT SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dupage Community FoundationIL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dupage Community Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Northern Illinois Food Bank · The Chicago Community Trust · The Allstate Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Edward Jones Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William and Evelyn Fuchs Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William and Evelyn Fuchs Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William and Evelyn Fuchs Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to William and Evelyn Fuchs Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William and Evelyn Fuchs Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph