Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

William and Caywood Hendricks

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$42kArts & Culture$24kYouth Development$17kEnvironment$15kHuman Services$9kEducation$8kInternational$7kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$335k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EL FUTURO$5,000
DREAM CTR FORSYTH CTY$3,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,500
LEAD GIRLS OF NC$2,500
PBS FOUNDATION$1,500
NPR$1,500
BETHESDA HOMELESS CTR$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
COMFORT VOL FIRE DEPT$1,000
THE CAROL WOODS FUND$1,000
NC AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE$1,000
BOOKMARKS$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 80% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NATL RES DEFENSE COUNC: $3k → 17%COMFORT VOL FIRE DEPT: $1k → 7%PRATHAM USA: $2k → 16%USA FOR UN REFUGEE: $5k → 14%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW: $1k → 18%FOOD BANK OF NC: $1k → 11%PFEIFFER UNIVERSITY: $1k → 13%THE CAROL WOODS FUND: $1k → 13%RANDOLPH ARTS GUILD: $1k → 14%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BAN: $3k → 15%NE CHAPTER AM RED CROSS: $1k → 21%PBS FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%NAT RES DEF COUNCIL: $3k → 17%WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTNL: $2k → 14%EL FUTURO: $6k → 11%THE HEALING PLACE: $1k → 12%RANDOLPH ARTS GUILD: $1k → 14%HELP OUR PEOPLE EAT: $2k → 15%NATIONAL RESOURCES COUN: $3k → 17%EL FUTURO: $5k → 11%FRIENDS OF CARRBORO: $1k → 13%HELP OUR PEOPLE EAT: $1k → 15%NATURAL RES DEF COUNCIL: $3k → 17%EL FUTURO: $5k → 11%YMCA-WINSTON SALEM: $3k → 15%NATURAL RES DEF COUNCIL: $2k → 17%NC AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE: $1k → 11%PIEDMONT ENVIRON ALLIAN: $1k → 15%NATIONAL RESOURCES CNCL: $1k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3k → 17%DREAM CENTER OF FORSYTH: $4k → 15%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 15%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3k → 17%BOOKMARKS INC: $13k → 15%LEAD GIRLS OF NC: $5k → 15%DREAM CTR FORSYTH CTY: $4k → 15%SALEM COLLEGE: $3k → 15%LEAD GIRLS OF NC: $3k → 15%LEAD GIRLS OF NC: $3k → 15%LEAD GIRLS OF NC: $3k → 15%LEAD GIRLS OF NC: $3k → 15%BETHESDA HOMELESS CTR: $2k → 15%LEAD GIRLS NC: $2k → 15%SALEM COLLEGE: $1k → 15%WS ARTS COUNCIL: $1k → 15%PIEDMONT ENVIRON ALLIAN: $1k → 15%BOOKMARKS INC: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
IA
VA
MD
NC
DC
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of William and Caywood Hendricks’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 75% of the giving stays in NC; read by stated purpose it is 61% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

William and Caywood Hendrickslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 17% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$96k · 12 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$96k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+45%

Still filing today

50%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyCrime & LegalArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EL FUTURO INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +66%
  • BI
    BOOKMARKS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +3%
  • LG
    LEAD Girls of NC Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +192%

Funded once

  • UF
    USA FOR UN REFUGEE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • DC
    DREAM CENTER OF FORSYTH
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • NR
    NAT RES DEF COUNCIL
    one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Spelman College

Spelman college, a historically black college and global leader in the education of women of african descent, is dedicated to the academic excellence of its students.

Education
2
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
3
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
4
Brevard College Corporation

Brevard college is committed to an experiential liberal arts education that encourages personal growth and inspires artistic, intellectual, and social action.

Education
5
The University of North Carolina Press Inc

To promote the advancement of the arts and sciences and the development of literature through the publishing of books, journals, and other forms of publications in all media.

Arts & Culture
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Lead Nc

LEAD NC is a non-partisan organization that seeks, encourages and cultivates a new generation of community and civic leaders for North Carolina through information dissemination, training and leadership development.

8
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
9
Greater Winston-Salem Development Corp

To recruit new businesses to winston-salem and forsyth county in order to facilitate growth and economic diversification in the area.

Community Improvement
10
North Carolina Business Leaders for Educ

The mission of north carolina business leaders for education (dba best nc) is to unite an engaged and informed business perspective to dramatically transform and improve north carolina's education system. our goal is for every student to…

Education
11
Public Schools First Nc

To educate and inform north carolinians about critical issues that impact our schools, our teachers and our students, and to engage all stakeholders in supporting a quality public education system.

Education
12
Freedom School Partners Inc

To inspire scholars to love reading and learning, believe in themselves, and create extraordinary futures.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salem Academy and College and the most unlike its peers is Pratham Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $9,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODUSA FOR UN REFUGEE — $5,000 · OtherUSA FOR UN REFUGEENATURAL RES DEF COUNCIL — $4,000 · OtherNATURAL RES DEF COUNCILDREAM CENTER OF FORSYTH — $4,000 · OtherDREAM CENTER OF FORSYTHNC AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE — $4,000 · OtherNC AGAINST GUN VIOLENCEDREAM CTR FORSYTH CTY — $3,500 · OtherDREAM CTR FORSYTH CTYNAT RES DEF COUNCIL — $2,500 · OtherHELP OUR PEOPLE EAT — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BAN — $2,500 · OtherNATL RES DEFENSE COUNC — $2,500 · Other+15 more — $17,000 · Other+15 moreEL FUTURO INC — $31,250 · HealthEL FUTURO INCBOOKMARKS INC — $17,500 · EducationBOOKMARKS INCSALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE — $3,500 · EducationSALEM ACADEMY AND…PFEIFFER UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · EducationLEAD Girls of NC Inc — $16,500 · Youth DevelopmentLEAD Girls of…RANDOLPH ARTS GUILD INC — $2,000 · Arts & CulturePBS FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Arts & CulturePRATHAM USA — $2,000 · PhilanthropyFORSYTH EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP — $1,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $1,000 · Crime & LegalA Safe Place Inc — $500 · Crime & Legal
Other$61,500Health$31,250Education$22,000Youth Development$16,500Arts & Culture$3,500Philanthropy$3,000Human Services$2,000Crime & Legal$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEL FUTURO INC — $31,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBOOKMARKS INC — $17,500 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetLEAD Girls of NC Inc — $16,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRANDOLPH ARTS GUILD INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRATHAM USA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARTS COUNCIL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORSYTH EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPFEIFFER UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Safe Place Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EL FUTURO INC
  • Who funds BOOKMARKS INC
  • Who funds LEAD Girls of NC Inc
  • Who funds SALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE
  • Who funds RANDOLPH ARTS GUILD INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA
  • Who funds PBS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE ARTS COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds FORSYTH EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP
  • Who funds PFEIFFER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds A Safe Place Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cannon Foundation IncNC15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cannon Foundation Inc · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Richard Wood Averill Charitable Trust aka Richard Wood Averill Foundation · Twin City Development Foundation · Reynolds Foundation 186-8803582 · Reynolds American Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization William and Caywood Hendricks funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph