Skip to content

· Private foundation

William a Steele Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$310k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.1MHuman Services$220kPhilanthropy$100kArts & Culture$30kAnimals$30kCommunity Improvement$25k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORLANDO HEALTH FOUNDATION$150,000
ADVENT HEALTH FOUNDATION HENDERSONV$50,000
ADVENT HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
DUPAGE FOUNDATION$25,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DSM$25,000
DR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR PERFORM ARTS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $80k → 10%YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $20k → 10%WESLEY RETIREMENT SERVICES: $20k → 10%YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $20k → 10%YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $20k → 10%YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $20k → 10%YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $20k → 10%YMCA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of William a Steele Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

William a Steele Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 7 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$1.3M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+39%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    Orlando Health Foundation Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $785k · revenue +358%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON IOWA
    7× · 2018–2024 · $200k · revenue +41%
  • AF
    AdventHealth Foundation Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • WR
    WESLEY RETIREMENT SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +39%
  • DP
    DR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
2
Atrium Medical Center Foundation

To develop charitable gifts and resources dedicated to building healthier communities in southwest ohio.

Health
3
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
4
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
5
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
6
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
7
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
8
Central Florida Ymca Foundation Inc

To support the central florida ymca.

Human Services
9
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
American Academy of Dermatology Association Inc

To represent the interests of dermatologists and their patients. to influence and be a credible resource for public and private entities related to all policies and regulations that have the potential to affect the delivery of dermatologic…

Health
11
Miami Valley Hospital Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at miami valley hospital by raising community support for cutting-edge programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Health
12
Columbus Medical Association Foundation

The columbus medical association foundation, through the governance and oversight of its board of physicians and other experts, effects change within specific priority areas to improve the health and wellbeing of the residents and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Florida Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Orlando Health Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Orlando Health Foundation Inc: $784,914 · HealthOrlando Health Foundation IncAdventHealth Foundation Inc: $150,000 · HealthAdventHealth Foundation IncYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON IOWA: $200,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRI…WESLEY RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesWESLEY RETIREMEN…HALCYON HOUSE: $80,000 · OtherHALCYON HOUSEADVENT HEALTH FOUNDATION HENDERSONV: $50,000 · OtherADVENT HEALTH F…DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherDERMATOLOGY FOU…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DSM: $25,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUND…DR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR PERFORM ARTS: $20,000 · OtherDR PHILLIPS CEN…THE DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $30,000 · AnimalsDR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$934,914Human Services$220,000Other$205,000Philanthropy$100,000Animals$30,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $784,914 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON IOWA: $200,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetAdventHealth Foundation Inc: $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWESLEY RETIREMENT SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William a Steele Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William a Steele Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Dr Phillips Center for the Performing Arts Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William a Steele Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to William a Steele Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William a Steele’s filings →

More from the funding graph