Skip to content

· Private foundation

William a Schmidt & Teresa Elliot Schmidt Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$173kHuman Services$136kHousing & Shelter$118kFood & Nutrition$46kRecreation & Sports$32kEnvironment$28kInternational$16kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$629k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA-CAMP JONES GULCH$16,000
CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY$15,750
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO$11,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$8,500
THE LIVING DESERT$5,000
FOOD SHARE INC$4,900
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,000
LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION$2,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$1,895
FIND FOOD BANK$1,500
SAN FERNADO VALLEY RESCUE MISSION$1,500
MCCALLUM THEATER$1,500
SALVATION ARMY$1,500
COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION$1,375
UNION RESCUE MISSION$1,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT: $12k → 11%CDF FIREFIGHERS BENEVOLENT FUND: $500 → 12%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $7k → 10%RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE: $800 → 14%FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT: $9k → 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT: $8k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT: $6k → 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 14%FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT: $5k → 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%GALILEE CENTER: $100 → 11%GOEBEL SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION: $500 → 10%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE CONEJO VALLEY: $48 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MI
NY
OR
OH
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AR
DC
HI
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 36% of William a Schmidt & Teresa Elliot Schmidt Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 72% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 43%.

William a Schmidt & Teresa Elliot Schmidt Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$579k · 47 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
58

Total granted

$579k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+39%

Still filing today

34%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FY
    FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT
    5× · 2017–2021 · $41k · revenue +18%
  • FS
    FOOD SHARE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +94%
  • LD
    LIVING DESERT THE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $28k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCOgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +40%
  • SF
    SAN FERNANDO VALLEY RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • SF
    SAN FERNANDO RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
Ucsf Health Medical Foundation

See schedule othe mission of ucsf health medical foundation is threefold: 1) to establish, operate and maintain medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; 2) to promote health by providing, coordinating,…

Health
8
Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health
9
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Choc Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Oak Park Education Foundation Nonprofit Public Benefit Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
31/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY: $149,040 · OtherCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $87,188 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYYMCA-CAMP JONES GULCH: $43,000 · OtherYMCA-CAMP JONES GULCHIndividual grant recipient: $24,000 · Other+83 more: $152,963 · Other+83 moreFAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT: $41,043 · Human ServicesFAMILY YMCA OF T…COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $26,975 · Human ServicesCOACHELLA VALLEY…UNION RESCUE MISSION: $16,600 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MIS…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $7,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRI…+6 more: $4,998 · Human ServicesFOOD SHARE INC: $32,600 · Food & NutritionFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC: $11,000 · Food & NutritionLIVING DESERT THE: $27,823 · EnvironmentThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $8,400 · HealthDESERT CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthNational Foundation For Cancer Research: $1,375 · HealthAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $850 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $750 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $700 · HealthSJOGREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $700 · Health+4 more: $1,450 · HealthMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $3,720 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropySave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $750 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $500 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 · International
Other$456,191Human Services$96,616Food & Nutrition$43,600Environment$27,823Health$16,225Philanthropy$4,220International$2,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT: $41,043 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC: $32,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $27,823 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $26,975 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $16,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $8,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $3,720 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNational Foundation For Cancer Research: $1,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PTA OF PS 133K INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSJOGREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROXBURY ARTS GROUP INC: $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPACIFIC PRIDE FOUNDATION: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHomeward Bound of Marin: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOEBEL SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMake the Road New York: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELECTRIC COMPANY THEATRE: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOAK PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORP: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIND INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGALILEE CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CONEJO VALLEY: $48 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT ↗
  • Who funds FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
  • Who funds COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DESERT CANCER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Desert Community FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Desert Community Foundation · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · California Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William a Schmidt & Teresa Elliot Schmidt Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William a Schmidt & Teresa Elliot Schmidt Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William a Schmidt & Teresa Elliot Schmidt Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to William a Schmidt & Teresa Elliot Schmidt Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William a Schmidt & Teresa Elliot Schmidt’s filings →

More from the funding graph