Skip to content

· Private foundation

William a Looney Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$571k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$15MPhilanthropy$4.9MEnvironment$100kRecreation & Sports$72kYouth Development$62kHousing & Shelter$58kEducation$29kFood & Nutrition$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Mustard Seed Project of Key Peninsula$500,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Great Basin College Fund$15,340
Eddy House$15,000
Spring Creek High School NFCCLA$12,000
Kennewick Police Department Foundation$5,000
Nevada National Fastpitch$2,000
Grand Coulee Dam Area Senior Center$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $703k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YWCA of Greater Portland: $15k → 12%Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada: $13k → 10%The Mustard Seed Project of Key Peninsula: $500k → 9%Eddy House: $15k → 10%THE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PENINSULA: $150k → 9%Eddy House: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 6 repeat orgs$432k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
22

Total granted

$16M
$376k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+4%

Still filing today

50%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsEnvironmentPhilanthropyCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Lutheran Community Services NW
    2× · 2017–2022 · $15M
  • TM
    THE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PENINSULA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $650k · revenue +23%
  • EH
    EDDY HOUSE
    2× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +421%

Funded once

  • ARBORETUM FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +95%
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Elko County
    one grant, 2023 · $52k
  • RM
    Ruby Mountain Resource Center
    one grant, 2023 · $38k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nevada Partnership for Homeless Youth

The organization provides wraparound services to meet homeless youths' immediate, emergency needs and help them transition to long-term self- sufficiency. the organization's support comes primarily from government grants and corporate…

Housing & Shelter
2
Nevada Agricultural Foundation
Food & Nutrition
3
Help of Southern Nevada

Help of southern nevada (organization) is a nonprofit corporation whose mission is to assist families and individuals throughout southern nevada to overcome barriers and attain self-sufficiency through direct services, training and…

Human Services
4
Nevada Housing Coalition

To promote the development and preservation of affordable housing for all nevadans through collaboration, education, and advocacy.

Housing & Shelter
5
Safe House Inc

S.a.f.e. house is a community based non-profit organization committed to stop abuse in the family environment by providing a comprehensive approach to end domestic violence that includes crisis intervention, safe shelter, counseling,…

Human Services
6
Nevada State University Foundation

The mission of the nevada state university foundation board of trustees is to serve as ambassadors for nevada state university, to serve as fiduciary stewards of funds received by the foundation, and to raise funds in support of the…

Education
7
United Way of Southern Nevada

United way of southern nevada, inc. (the organization or united way) is a not-for-profit corporation governed by a local volunteer board of directors. the organization was incorporated in 1957 and its operations are primarily in clark…

Philanthropy
8
Nevada Peer Support Network Inc
Health
9
Nevada State Parks Foundation

The nevada state parks foundation is dedicated to enhancing and preserving the natural beauty, cultural heritage and recreational opportunities within the nevada division of state parks. the foundation is committed to supporting the…

Environment
10
Healthy Nevada
Health
11
Nevada Volunteers

To solicit applications for americorps funding and to support the volunteer infrastructure in nevada.

Philanthropy
12
Inter-Tribal Council of Nevada Inc

Itcn's mission is to secure for our people the rights and benefits which should accrue to them pursuant to treaties and all legal, moral and equitable commitments and undertakings of the united states government; to preserve and protect…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eddy House; the most unlike its peers is The Kennewick Police Department Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Lutheran Community Services NW: $15,102,000 · OtherLutheran Community Services NW+23 more: $302,739 · OtherTHE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PENINSULA: $650,000 · Human ServicesEDDY HOUSE: $25,000 · Human Services+2 more: $27,500 · Human ServicesARBORETUM FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EnvironmentNevada Youth Ski Education Foundation: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsNevada National Fastpitch: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsGREAT BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $8,452 · EducationTHE KENNEWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Crime & LegalHIGHLINE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$15,404,739Human Services$702,500Environment$100,000Recreation & Sports$14,000Education$8,452Crime & Legal$5,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PENINSULA: $650,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetARBORETUM FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetEDDY HOUSE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMERCY HOUSING NORTHWEST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA OF GREATER PORTLAND: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCatholic Charities of Northern Nevada: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $8,452 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHIGHLINE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds ARBORETUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDDY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSING NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds YWCA OF GREATER PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds ELF LOUISE INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada ↗
  • Who funds Nevada Youth Ski Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GREAT BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE KENNEWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLINE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE ↗
  • Who funds Nevada National Fastpitch ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William a Looney Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William a Looney Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Ywca of Greater Portland: 15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William a Looney Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to William a Looney Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William a Looney Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph