Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

William a Looney Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$266k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$15MPhilanthropy$4.9MEnvironment$100kRecreation & Sports$72kYouth Development$62kHousing & Shelter$58kEducation$29kFood & Nutrition$27kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PENINSULA$150,000
Arboretum Foundation$100,000
SPRING CREEK High School FCCLA$6,000
TRI-CITIES UNION GOSPEL MISSION$5,000
Highline Schools Foundation for Excellence$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $188k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YWCA of Greater Portland: $15k → 12%Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada: $13k → 10%THE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PENINSULA: $150k → 9%Eddy House: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 4 repeat orgs$536k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
19

Total granted

$15M
$270k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-47%
+21%

Still filing today

25%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $266k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Lutheran Community Services NW
    2× · 2017–2022 · $15M
  • EY
    Elko Youth Courts
    2× · 2022–2023 · $16k
  • GB
    GREAT BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $8k · revenue -47%

Funded once

  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Elko County
    one grant, 2023 · $52k
  • RM
    Ruby Mountain Resource Center
    one grant, 2023 · $38k
  • WP
    Whatcom Parks & Rec Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $31k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nevada Housing Coalition

To promote the development and preservation of affordable housing for all nevadans through collaboration, education, and advocacy.

Housing & Shelter
2
Nevada Agricultural Foundation
Food & Nutrition
3
Next Move Homeless Services

To help families with children and individuals achieve self-reliance

4
University of Nevada Reno Foundation

Facilitate gifts & grants for the benefit of the University of Nevada, Reno to enhance the quality of education through charitable giving.

Education
5
University of Nevada Las Vegas Foundation

The University of Nevada, Las Vegas Foundation is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that raises and manages private funds for the benefit of UNLV. Our mission is to increase philanthropic support for the university, grow its endowment for…

Education
6
Healthy Nevada
Health
7
Nevada Partnership for Homeless Youth

The organization provides wraparound services to meet homeless youths' immediate, emergency needs and help them transition to long-term self- sufficiency. the organization's support comes primarily from government grants and corporate…

Housing & Shelter
8
Nevada State College Foundation

The mission of the nevada state college foundation board of trustees is to serve as ambassadors for nevada state college, to serve as fiduciary stewards of funds received by the foundation, and to raise funds in support of the educational,…

Education
9
North Valley Caring Services

To empower neighborhood residents to build a vision of their community's future and to actively engage in solving local problems.

Human Services
10
Shelter Providers of Southern Nevada Inc Dba Homeaid Southern Nevada

Promote and facilitate the construction of housing for transitionally homeless men, women, and children

11
Southern Nevada Senior Law Program

To provide quality legal assistance and advocacy services for residents 60 years and older facing challenges of aging.

Human Services
12
Youth Shelters & Family Services Inc

To deliver life-changing services to homeless, runaway, and in-crisis youth in northern nm.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eddy House and the most unlike its peers is Ywca of Greater Portland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Lutheran Community Services NW — $15,102,000 · OtherLutheran Community Services NW+19 more — $254,199 · OtherTHE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PENINSULA — $150,000 · Human ServicesYWCA OF GREATER PORTLAND — $15,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of Northern Nevada — $12,500 · Human ServicesEDDY HOUSE — $10,000 · Human ServicesARBORETUM FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EnvironmentNevada Youth Ski Education Foundation — $12,000 · Recreation & SportsGREAT BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $8,452 · EducationHIGHLINE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$15,356,199Human Services$187,500Environment$100,000Recreation & Sports$12,000Education$8,452Philanthropy$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PENINSULA — $150,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetARBORETUM FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMERCY HOUSING NORTHWEST — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA OF GREATER PORTLAND — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCatholic Charities of Northern Nevada — $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDDY HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREAT BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $8,452 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHIGHLINE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PENINSULA
  • Who funds ARBORETUM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSING NORTHWEST
  • Who funds YWCA OF GREATER PORTLAND
  • Who funds ELF LOUISE INC
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada
  • Who funds Nevada Youth Ski Education Foundation
  • Who funds EDDY HOUSE
  • Who funds GREAT BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HIGHLINE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization William a Looney Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 15%
  • Ywca of Greater Portland15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William a Looney Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to William a Looney Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph