Skip to content

· Private foundation

William a Fisher II Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$127kHuman Services$46kEducation$34kFood & Nutrition$11kHousing & Shelter$11kArts & Culture$10kEnvironment$10kRecreation & Sports$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$360k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANNA FOOD PROJECT$7,000
MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$6,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN$4,500
HARBOR SPRINGS FOOD PANTRY$3,000
SAFE HARBOR OF GRAND TRAVERSE$2,500
NMC FOUNDATION$2,000
MUNSON HEALTHCARE REGIONAL FOUNDATION$1,500
UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN$1,000
TOP OF MICHIGAN TRAILS COUNCIL$1,000
FRESHWATER FUTURE$1,000
TIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED$1,000
CROSSHATCH CENTER FOR ART & EDUCATION$1,000
CROOKED TREE ARTS COUNCIL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $10k → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $8k → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $6k → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $5k → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $5k → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$253k · 16 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$253k
$3k

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    Womens Resource Center of Northern Michigan Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $38k · revenue +56%
  • SH
    SAFE HARBOR OF GRAND TRAVERSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +60%
  • MH
    MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • PS
    PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • NF
    NCMC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
The Little Forks Conservancy Inc

To permanently protect and improve natural environments in Mid-Michigan by leading and inspiring actions that conserve vital habitats and waterways for the benefit of our entire community.

Environment
3
Huron County Community Foundation

Receive and Administer funds for the public welfare of the people of Huron County, Michigan

Philanthropy
4
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
5
United Way of Marquette County

Focusing community resources to meet community needs the United Way of Marquette County works to advance the common good by connecting people with health and human care issues they are concerned about and to provide the oversight the…

—
6
Northwest Michigan Rural Housing Partnership

To help provide safe, accessible, and affordable housing in Northwest Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
7
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
8
211 Northeast Michigan

To provide Northeast Michigan with referrals and information to assist with essential needs.

Community Improvement
9
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
10
Fund for Lake Michigan Inc

Lake Michigan is one of Wisconsin's greatest assets, and its water is critical to the state's future. The Fund for Lake Michigan is here to help sustain the Lake on behalf of the people and places that depend on it. Our goal is to have a…

Environment
11
Grand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy

The mission of gtrlc is to protect significant natural, scenic and farm lands and advance land stewardship now and for future generations.

Environment
12
Chippewa Watershed Conservancy Inc

To protect and restore central michigan's land, water, and wildlife resources to improve the quality of life for all.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Manna Food Project Inc Dba - the Manna Food Project; the most unlike its peers is Thoreau College Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $87,000 · OtherMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONNORTHERN MICHIGAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherNORTHERN MICHIGAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONNMC FOUNDATION: $18,000 · OtherNMC FOUNDATIONMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $9,500 · OtherCROSSHATCH CENTER FOR ART & EDUCATION: $8,000 · OtherTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT: $8,000 · Other+7 more: $18,000 · Other+7 moreWomens Resource Center of Northern Michigan Inc: $37,500 · Human ServicesWomens Resource …SAFE HARBOR OF GRAND TRAVERSE INC: $10,500 · Housing & ShelterCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INC: $8,000 · ReligionTop of Michigan Trails Council: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsTIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL: $3,000 · EnvironmentGreat Lakes Aquatic Habitat Network and Fund Inc: $3,000 · EnvironmentCROOKED TREE ARTS COUNCIL INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$188,500Human Services$37,500Housing & Shelter$10,500Religion$8,000Recreation & Sports$7,000Environment$6,000Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWomens Resource Center of Northern Michigan Inc: $37,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSAFE HARBOR OF GRAND TRAVERSE INC: $10,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $9,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INC: $8,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTop of Michigan Trails Council: $7,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMEAD PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGreat Lakes Aquatic Habitat Network and Fund Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCROOKED TREE ARTS COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Womens Resource Center of Northern Michigan Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR OF GRAND TRAVERSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Top of Michigan Trails Council ↗
  • Who funds MEAD PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat Network and Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROOKED TREE ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THOREAU COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community FoundationMI24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation · Frey Foundation · Charlevoix County Community Foundation · The Offield Family Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Oleson Foundation · William T & Ann D McCormick Educational and Charitable Foundation · Triford Foundation · Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William a Fisher II Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William a Fisher II Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William a Fisher II Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to William a Fisher II Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William a Fisher II Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph