Skip to content

· Private foundation

William A & Marth H Hillenbrand Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$261k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$484kHealth$230kHuman Services$123kArts & Culture$103kReligion$80kCommunity Improvement$58kPhilanthropy$53kPublic Benefit$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $117k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Margaret Mary Hospital Foundation$67,000
Kids Discovery Factory$50,000
St Louis Catholic Schoolchurch$30,000
Safe Passage$25,000
Healthnetwork Foundation$25,000
Batesville Memorial Public Library$25,000
Batesville Main Street$25,000
So Loved Ripley County Foster Closet$8,250
Summer Food For Kids$5,000
Batesville Historical Society$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Healthnetwork Foundation: $25k → 17%Edelweiss House: $7k → 11%Safe Passage: $25k → 12%Safe Passage: $25k → 12%Safe Passage: $23k → 12%Safe Passage: $20k → 12%Safe Passage: $20k → 12%So Loved Ripley County Foster Closet: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$953k · 14 repeat orgs$291k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$953k
$182k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+15%

Still filing today

36%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAFE PASSAGE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $113k · revenue +15%
  • BM
    BATESVILLE MAIN STREET INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $58k · revenue +56%
  • MM
    MARGARET MARY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $50k · revenue +570%

Funded once

  • B
    BCEF
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • CO
    City of Batesville
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ripley Inc
—
2
St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc

As a catholic healthcare ministry, we provide comprehensive and compassionate care that improves the health of the people we serve.

Health
3
Riggs Community Health Center Inc

Providing primary health care to low-income residents.

Health
4
Mark Twain Medical Center

Mark twain medical center is committed to furthering the charitable and community-based health care purposes, mission, vision and core values. through teamwork and innovation, faith and compassion, advocacy and action, we endeavor every…

Health
5
Reedsburg Area Medical Center

Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.

Health
6
Ridgecrest Regional Hospital Foundation

To support ridgecrest regional hospital

Health
7
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
9
DuBois Regional Medical Center

To provide the patient with exceptional care through our community-based health system while maintaining a reverence for life. it's the vision of the system to be the integrated health system of choice through excellent quality, service…

Health
10
Riverwood Healthcare Center & Community Hospital Foundation

Riverwood foundation exists to raise money for riverwood healthcare center to enhance the quality of care for the community we serve.

—
11
Marcus Daly Memorial Hospital

Our commitment to the bitterroot valley is quality, accessible, personalized healthcare.

Health
12
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Margaret Mary Health Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Batesville Main Street Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Louis Catholic Schoolchurch: $213,625 · OtherSt Louis Catholic SchoolchurchOldenburg Academy: $178,077 · OtherOldenburg AcademyMargaret Mary Hospital Foundation: $132,000 · OtherMargaret Mary Hospital FoundationSt Catherine of Sienna: $65,000 · OtherSt Catherine of SiennaBatesville High School: $57,500 · OtherBatesville High SchoolBCEF: $50,000 · OtherBCEFCity of Batesville: $30,000 · Other+18 more: $164,137 · Other+18 moreSAFE PASSAGE INC: $112,500 · Human ServicesSAFE PASSAGE …HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK…SO LOVED RIPLEY COUNTY FOSTER CLOSET: $8,250 · Human ServicesSO LOVED RIPL…EDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $7,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesKIDS DISCOVERY FACTORY: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · Arts & CultureBATESVILLE MAIN STREET INC: $57,875 · Community ImprovementMARGARET MARY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthGIVING HEARTS A HAND INC: $2,500 · HealthXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationRIPLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$890,339Human Services$153,750Arts & Culture$80,000Community Improvement$57,875Health$52,500Education$10,000Philanthropy$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAFE PASSAGE INC: $112,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetBATESVILLE MAIN STREET INC: $57,875 over 3y, 21% of budgetMARGARET MARY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSO LOVED RIPLEY COUNTY FOSTER CLOSET: $8,250 over 1y, 15% of budgetEDELWEISS HOUSE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetGIVING HEARTS A HAND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 15% of budgetRIPLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAFE PASSAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds BATESVILLE MAIN STREET INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS DISCOVERY FACTORY ↗
  • Who funds MARGARET MARY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SO LOVED RIPLEY COUNTY FOSTER CLOSET ↗
  • Who funds EDELWEISS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVING HEARTS A HAND INC ↗
  • Who funds RIPLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Frederick W and Jolene Edmunds Rockwood Family FoundationIN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Frederick W and Jolene Edmunds Rockwood Family Foundation · John A Hillenbrand Foundation Inc · W August Hillenbrand Family Foundation · Ripley County Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William A & Marth H Hillenbrand Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William A & Marth H Hillenbrand Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William A & Marth H Hillenbrand Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to William A & Marth H Hillenbrand Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William A & Marth H Hillenbrand’s filings →

    More from the funding graph