Skip to content

· Private foundation

Willard J & Mary G Breidenthal Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$648k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.7MAnimals$344kYouth Development$286kArts & Culture$181kRecreation & Sports$140kHousing & Shelter$40kHealth$3k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $225k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KU WILLIAMS EDUCATION FUND$300,000
POKES FOR A PURPOSE$175,000
WILLIAMS FUND$50,000
KANSAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY$37,500
Individual grant recipient$30,000
OKLAHOMA STATE UNVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$25,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE ZOO$1,000
BONNER ANIMAL RESCUE$1,000
GIRL SCOUTS$500
KCUR$500
WYANDOTTE COUNTY MUSEUM$500
KANSAS CITY PUBLIC TELEVISION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%POKES FOR A PURPOSE: $175k → 15%OKLAHOMA STATE UNVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50k → 19%KANSAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $38k → 14%KU WILLIAMS EDUCATION FUND: $300k → 15%REACHING CHAMPIONS JOINING HEARTS: $50k → 16%KC KS SCHOOL FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLE: $5k → 16%EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $218k → 16%KANSAS STATE ATHLETICS-AHEARN FUND: $50k → 20%UMKC WOMEN'S BASKETBALL: $65k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FDN: $10k → 9%POKES FOR A PURPOSE: $150k → 15%KANSAS STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $38k → 14%KU WILLIAMS EDUCATION FUND: $251k → 15%KANSAS CITY KANSAS: $200k → 16%EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $211k → 16%UMKC WOMEN'S BASKETBALL: $65k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FDN: $10k → 9%POKES WITH A PURPOSE INC: $40k → 15%KANSAS STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $38k → 14%KU WILLIAMS EDUCATION FUND: $251k → 15%KANSAS CITY KANSAS COMMUNITY COLLEG: $150k → 16%EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $205k → 16%UMKC WOMEN'S BASKETBALL: $10k → 15%KANSAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $38k → 14%KU WILLIAMS EDUCATION FUND: $251k → 15%KANSAS CITY KANSAS COMMUNITY COLLEG: $150k → 16%EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $204k → 16%KANSAS STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 14%KU WILLIAMS EDUCATION FUND: $50k → 15%KANSAS CITY KANSAS: $30k → 16%EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $56k → 16%WILLIAMS FUND: $50k → 15%DONNELLY COLLEGE: $125k → 16%EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%DONNELLY COLLEGE: $125k → 16%COMMUNITY HOUSING OF WYANDOTTE COUN: $20k → 16%COMMUNITY HOUSING OF WYANDOTTE COUN: $10k → 16%COMMUNITY HOUSING OF WYANDOTTE COUN: $5k → 16%CATHOLIC HOUSING OF WYANDOTTE COUNT: $5k → 16%BOYS GIRLS CLUBS-GREATER KANSAS CIT: $50k → 15%BOYS GIRLS CLUBS-GREATER KANSAS CIT: $50k → 15%BOYS GIRLS CLUBS-GREATER KANSAS CIT: $50k → 15%WILLIAMS EDUCATIONAL FUND-KU: $251k → 15%WILLIAMS EDUCATIONAL FUND-KU: $251k → 15%KANSAS UNIVERSITY: $51k → 15%BOYS GIRLS CLUBS-GREATER KANSAS CIT: $50k → 15%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $50k → 15%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 23 repeat orgs$327k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
8

Total granted

$3.4M
$252k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-15%
+21%

Still filing today

17%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KW
    KU WILLIAMS EDUCATION FUND
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M
  • WE
    WILLIAMS EDUCATIONAL FUND-KU
    2× · 2018–2021 · $502k
  • PF
    POKES FOR A PURPOSE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $325k

Funded once

  • KU
    KANSAS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $51k
  • KS
    KANSAS STATE ATHLETICS-AHEARN FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • OS
    OKLAHOMA STATE UNVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
2
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
3
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
4
Kansas State University Foundation

The mission of the kansas state university foundation is to secure and prudently manage private gifts in support of kansas state university and foster a culture that unites philanthropic desires with university priorities.

Education
5
Umkc Foundation

Umkc foundation's sole purpose is to benefit the university of missouri - kansas city (umkc) by supporting (through funds raised, held and administered by the foundation) academic programs and educational opportunities that will enhance…

Education
6
Pittsburg State University Foundation Inc

To maximize private gift support for pittsburg state university, exercise proper management of foundation assets, lay the groundwork for future fundraising success in support of the university's teaching, research and service/civic…

Education
7
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
8
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
9
Washburn University Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the university and communities that have touched the lives of wu alumni and friends, the mission of the washburn university charitable gift fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable…

Education
10
Northwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc and Alumni Association

To provide support to NWOSU and scholarships to NWOSU students

Education
11
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
12
Kansas Wesleyan University Foundation

The foundation is organized to secure gifts of money or property in efforts of advancing education and/or research; therefore, providing assistance in furthering the mission of kansas wesleyan university.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pokes With a Purpose Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KU WILLIAMS EDUCATION FUND: $1,103,300 · OtherKU WILLIAMS EDUCATION FUNDWILLIAMS EDUCATIONAL FUND-KU: $502,025 · OtherWILLIAMS EDUCATIONAL FUND-KUPOKES FOR A PURPOSE: $325,000 · OtherPOKES FOR A PURPOSEKANSAS CITY KANSAS COMMUNITY COLLEG: $300,000 · OtherKANSAS CITY KANSAS COMMUNITY COLLEGIndividual grant recipient: $230,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS GIRLS CLUBS-GREATER KANSAS CIT: $203,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUBS-GREATER KANSAS CITIndividual grant recipient: $140,000 · Other+19 more: $444,100 · Other+19 moreEMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $943,871 · EducationEMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDA…Donnelly College: $250,000 · EducationDonnelly CollegeREACHING CHAMPIONS JOINING HEARTS INC: $50,000 · Education+2 more: $45,000 · EducationKansas State Historical Society Inc: $83,000 · Arts & CultureFREEDOMS FRONTIER NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA INC: $6,000 · Arts & CulturePokes With A Purpose Inc: $40,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$3,247,425Education$1,288,871Arts & Culture$89,000Recreation & Sports$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $943,871 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetDonnelly College: $250,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetKansas State Historical Society Inc: $83,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetREACHING CHAMPIONS JOINING HEARTS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPokes With A Purpose Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOMS FRONTIER NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKansas City Kansas School Foundation of Excellence: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGENERATION RESCUE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Donnelly College ↗
  • Who funds Kansas State Historical Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds REACHING CHAMPIONS JOINING HEARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Pokes With A Purpose Inc ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOMS FRONTIER NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds Kansas City Kansas School Foundation of Excellence ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Willard J & Mary G Breidenthal Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Willard J & Mary G Breidenthal Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Willard J & Mary G Breidenthal’s filings →

    More from the funding graph