Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wilford Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$113kHuman Services$37kArts & Culture$30kAnimals$21kYouth Development$5kEmployment$3kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$924k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES$10,000
MEMORIAL CARE SADDLEBACK MED CTR FN$10,000
CASA ROMANTICA CULTURAL CENTER CENT$5,000
PIERPRIDE$3,000
BREAKTHROUGH$3,000
CANINE COMPANIONS$3,000
PET PROJECT FOUNDATION$2,000
AGE WELL$2,000
LOBULAR BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE$2,000
SANDY FEET INITIATIVE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $3k → 11%CANINE COMPANIONS: $3k → 11%CANINE COMPANIONS: $3k → 11%CANINE COMPANIONS: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$214k · 12 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +110% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$214k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+110%
+20%

Still filing today

58%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2019–2022 · $42k · revenue +39%
  • PP
    PET PROJECT FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $11k · revenue +325%
  • P
    PIERPRIDE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +301%

Funded once

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB SOUTH COAST
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +20%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
2
Santa Catalina Island Conservancy

The catalina island conservancy protects and stewards 88% of catalina island. more than 42,000 acres of wildlands, coves and coastal habitats. founded to preserve the island's natural resources, the conservancy advances a mission rooted in…

—
3
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
5
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
Providence Saint John's Medical Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
8
Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy

The parker institute for cancer immunotherapy's (pici) mission is to accelerate the development of breakthrough immune therapies to turn all cancers into curable diseases.

Health
9
Providence Facey Medical Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

—
10
Monterey Peninsula Foundation

To improve the quality of life in monterey county and surrounding areas by providing grants to nonprofit organizations that benefit the community in the areas of youth, education, health and human services, arts and culture, and community…

Philanthropy
11
Sutter Coast Hospital

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Prima Medical Foundation

To perform and carry out charitable healthcare functions and purposes by establishing, operating, and maintaining multi-specialty medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; and by engaging in, sponsoring,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canine Companions for Independence Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pierpride. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEMORIAL CARE SADDLEBACK MED CTR FN: $64,000 · OtherMEMORIAL CARE SADDLEBACK MED CTR FNCASA ROMANTICA CULTURAL CENTER CENT: $18,500 · OtherCASA ROMANTICA CULTURAL CENTER CENTBREAKTHROUGH: $10,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH+5 more: $10,500 · Other+5 moreMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $42,000 · HealthMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL…LOBULAR BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $7,000 · HealthLOBULAR BREAST CANCER ALL…FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $33,500 · PhilanthropyFAMILY ASSISTANCE…PET PROJECT FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · AnimalsPIERPRIDE: $11,000 · Arts & CultureCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $9,500 · Human ServicesSANDY FEET INITIATIVE: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · International
Other$103,000Health$49,000Philanthropy$33,500Animals$11,000Arts & Culture$11,000Human Services$9,500Youth Development$2,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $42,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $33,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPET PROJECT FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetPIERPRIDE: $11,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOBULAR BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSANDY FEET INITIATIVE: $2,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds PET PROJECT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PIERPRIDE ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOBULAR BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY FEET INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wilford Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wilford Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wilford’s filings →

    More from the funding graph