Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wilbur S Smith and Margaret P Smith Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$124kHuman Services$56kPhilanthropy$42kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kEducation$24kReligion$23kHousing & Shelter$22kFood & Nutrition$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREENWOOD$6,000
COMMUNITY INITIATIVES OF GREENWOOD$4,000
GALLAGER' HEROES FALLEN OFFICER'S F$4,000
ALMOST HOME FELINE REFUGE INC$3,500
GREENWOOD PATHWAY HOUSE$3,000
HOME FOR HEROES$3,000
THE HEART OF LCAC$3,000
CONGAREE RIVERKEEPER$2,500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$2,000
GREATER GREENWOOD UNITED MINISTRY$2,000
PAWS ANIMAL WILDLIFE SANCTUARY$2,000
SEMPER FI AMERICA'S FUND$2,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$2,000
FOOD BANK OF GREENWOOD COUNTY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREATER GREENWOOD UNITED MINISTRY: $3k → 18%GREATER GREENWOOD UNITED MINISTRY: $3k → 18%GREATER GREENWOOD UNITED MINISTRY: $3k → 18%GREATER GREENWOOD UNITED MINISTRY: $2k → 18%GREATER GREENWOOD UNITED MINISTRY: $2k → 18%GREATER GREENWOOD UNITED MINISTRY: $2k → 18%MEG'S HOUSE: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
CA
UT
VA
AZ
NC
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Wilbur S Smith and Margaret P Smith Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 69% of the giving stays in SC; by stated purpose, 0%.

Wilbur S Smith and Margaret P Smith Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$366k · 26 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
8

Total granted

$366k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+31%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREENWOOD
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +32%
  • GP
    GREENWOOD PATHWAY HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +97%
  • SF
    SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND
    6× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • SR
    SELF REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +67%
  • BA
    BEYOND ABUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +26%
  • IF
    INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Garden Rescues Inc

The mission of garden rescues inc is to rescue small breed dogs who are homeless, abused, or at risk for euthanasia at kill shelters. we will provide medical care as well as a loving and safe environment for the dogs while we seek to find…

—
2
Southern Comfort Animal Rescue Inc

Southern Comfort Animal Rescue, Inc. is 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization that rescues and rehomes abused, unwanted and abandoned companion animals.Southern Comfort was founded in 2001 in Savannah, Georgia, to provide shelter and find…

Animals
3
Greenwood Wildlife Rehabilitation Center

The center is devoted to the rehabilitation and release of orphaned and injured wildlife. the center also provides outreach programs focused on rehabilitation and humane solutions to human-wildlife conflicts.

Animals
4
Greenwood Pathway House Foundation

Foundation to invest legacy gifts restricted to benefit greenwood pathway house inc (ein 45-0833715) located in greenwood, sc. pathway house's mission is to help homeless persons navigate a pathway to physical, financial, and social…

Philanthropy
5
Foundation for a Greater Greenwood County Inc

Providing leadership to enhance the quality of life in greenwood through strategic long-term vision and collaborative community development initiatives.

Philanthropy
6
Dorchester Paws

Dorchester Paws strives to instill humane principles into society through the prevention of cruelty to animals.

Animals
7
Palmetto Paws Animal Rescue

The organization is dedicated to saving pets from certain death in shelters, prevent animal neglect and cruelty, and reduce the overpopulation of unwanted pets.

Animals
8
Saving Grace Animals for Adoption

A non-profit organization dedicated to lowering euthanasia rates and promoting adoption in north carolina, aspires to foster lifelong connections between well-deserving dogs and families, placing them in successful, nurturing homes.…

Animals
9
Safe Haven for Cats

The mission of safe haven for cats is to use no-kill principles and education to save cats' lives through rescue, adoption, spay/neuter services and community programs.

Animals
10
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
11
Charleston Animal Society

Since its founding, our mission has always stayed the same: the prevention of cruelty to animals. in 1874, charleston animal society became the first animal organization in south carolina and one of the first in the nation and has never…

Animals
12
Southern Souls Rescue

Animal Welfare and Rescue.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Greenwood United Ministry; the most unlike its peers is International Fellowship Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GALLAGER' HEROES FALLEN OFFICER'S FUND: $36,000 · OtherGALLAGER' HEROES FALLEN OFFICER'S FUNDHOME FOR HEROES: $21,000 · OtherHOME FOR HEROESALMOST HOME FELINE REFUGE INC: $17,000 · OtherALMOST HOME FELINE REFUGE INCUNITED WAY OF GREENWOOD: $14,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREENWOODIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES OF GREENWOOD SC: $10,000 · OtherGREENWOOD COMMUNITY THEATER: $7,000 · OtherALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $11,000 · OtherALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOMCONGAREE RIVERKEEPER INC: $9,500 · OtherGREENWOOD COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $7,700 · Other+18 more: $56,400 · Other+18 moreHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREENWOOD: $80,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREENWOODChapmans Dachshund Rescue: $10,000 · AnimalsChapmans Dachshund RescuePAWS ANIMAL WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC: $10,000 · AnimalsPAWS ANIMAL WILDLIFE SANCTUAR…+2 more: $4,000 · AnimalsPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $13,300 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $11,000 · EducationGREATER GREENWOOD UNITED MINISTRY: $15,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesMEG'S HOUSE: $1,000 · Human ServicesGREENWOOD PATHWAY HOUSE INC: $20,600 · Housing & ShelterSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $15,500 · HealthFOOD BANK OF GREENWOOD COUNTY: $12,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$203,600Animals$104,000Education$24,300Human Services$22,000Housing & Shelter$20,600Health$15,500Food & Nutrition$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREENWOOD: $80,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetGREENWOOD PATHWAY HOUSE INC: $20,600 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $15,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER GREENWOOD UNITED MINISTRY: $15,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $13,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF GREENWOOD COUNTY: $12,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChapmans Dachshund Rescue: $10,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetPAWS ANIMAL WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC: $10,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetCONGAREE RIVERKEEPER INC: $9,500 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetGREENWOOD COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $7,700 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSELF REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCarolina Poodle Rescue: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND ABUSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEG'S HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER GREENWOOD PARKS AND TRAILS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREENWOOD ↗
  • Who funds GREENWOOD PATHWAY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GREENWOOD UNITED MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF GREENWOOD COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chapmans Dachshund Rescue ↗
  • Who funds PAWS ANIMAL WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGAREE RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWOOD COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds SELF REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Carolina Poodle Rescue ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds MEG'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GREENWOOD PARKS AND TRAILS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Countybank FoundationSC22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Countybank Foundation · Davis Family Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Greenwood County Community Foundation Inc · The Self Foundation · The Bowers-Rodgers Home Foundation · Ascend Cares Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wilbur S Smith and Margaret P Smith Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wilbur S Smith and Margaret P Smith Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wilbur S Smith and Margaret P Smith Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Wilbur S Smith and Margaret P Smith Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wilbur S Smith and Margaret P Smith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph