· Private foundation
Whole Cities Foundation
Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 64 grants below total $508,154 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $749,982 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $241,828 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k50 grants · $298k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $211k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Newark Science and Sustainability, Inc. | $25,000 |
| Farmshare Austin | $22,000 |
| Unified Vailsburg Services Organization | $15,000 |
| Ironbound Community Corporation | $15,000 |
| Newark Science and Sustainability | $15,000 |
| Urban Agriculture Cooperative | $14,665 |
| Hawk Mountain Earth Center | $14,000 |
| Viva Farms | $13,000 |
| Dunbar Garden | $13,000 |
| Youth Ministries for Peace and Justice | $13,000 |
| Red Hills Small Farm Alliance, Inc. | $13,000 |
| Friends of Holly Hill Farm, Inc. Giving One Tenth Community Garden (Urban Agriculture Cooperative) | $12,980 |
| Landmark Training Development Company | $12,694 |
| Green Garden Bunches | $12,190 |
| Bonton Farms (Dallas Foundation) | $9,755 |
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Brooklyn Heights Community Garden cultivates healthy community through growing food, intergenerational learning and creative play.
Common Good City Farm is an urban farm in Washington, DC, where community members source fresh food, see sustainable urban agriculture in action, and learn healthy skills. Our mission is to sustain and support a more equitable community…
Urban Harvest is transforming food accessibility in Greater Houston through partnerships with local farmers and gardeners, vibrant Farmers Markets and mobile markets, and comprehensive garden education. Our goal is not just to improve, but…
Sprout city farms collaborates with communities to pursue food justice by cultivating innovative, restorative, and educational farms. sprout city farms envisions a thriving and equitable food system supported by a network of farms and…
Development in Gardening is improving the nutrition and livelihoods of some of the world's most uniquely marginalized people by teaching them to plant regenerative gardens that grow health, wealth, and a sense of belonging.
Green city market is securing the future of food by deepening support for sustainable farmers, educating our community, and expanding access to locally-grown food.
To increase access to fresh, healthy food for the most vulnerable by building and maintaining gardens in their neighborhoods where we teach people to plant, grow, and harvest.
The organization is committed to developing a sustainable community food system by bringing together diverse groups of people, with a focus on youth development, to establish community gardens, urban agriculture and community green spaces.…
Urban Tilth is a California nonprofit organization committed to educate diverse communities about organic gardening and to support a network of gardens dedicated to sustainable, local food production. Urban Tilth insipires, hires, and…
To revitalize urban areas through agricultural and education programming. the organization offers practical, technical, and financial resources in support of environmental stewardship, equitable access to healthy food, and ecologically…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health in the Hood Inc and the most unlike its peers is Isabahlia Ladies of Elegance Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEWARK SCIENCE AND SUSTAINABIL ↗
- Who funds FARMSHARE AUSTIN ↗
- Who funds Ironbound Community Corporation ↗
- Who funds UNIFIED VAILSBURG SERVICES ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds URBAN AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE ↗
- Who funds HAWK MOUNTAIN EARTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VIVA FARMS ↗
- Who funds RED HILLS SMALL FARM ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds LANDMARK TRAINING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Detroit Black Community Food Sovereignty Network ↗
- Who funds PROJECT USE ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds City Slicker Farms ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds FRANKLINTON FARMS ↗
- Who funds Community Matters Cincinnati Inc ↗
- Who funds Special Service for Groups Inc ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY COMMUNITY GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds Growing Gardens ↗
- Who funds KENEY PARK SUSTAINABILITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SMITH HILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE REFUGEE COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds EASTIE FARM INC ↗
- Who funds CRABTREE FARMS OF CHATTANOOGA INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN BAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds YWCA EvanstonNorth Shore ↗
- Who funds Truly Living Well Ctr for Natural Urban ↗
- Who funds COMMON THREADS FARM ↗
- Who funds VIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Whole Foods Market Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · UNFI Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Pseg Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Windward Fund · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Levitt Foundation Inc · Victoria Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Whole Cities Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Whole Cities Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.