Skip to content

· Private foundation

Whitepath Fabtech Foundation Inc

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Education$125kReligion$30kCommunity Improvement$17kInternational$10kHuman Services$8kHealth$2kCrime & Legal$2kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$16,867
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH GEORGIA CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC$16,867
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CRADDOCK CENTER: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 6 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2021, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
14

Total granted

$157k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+44%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationInternationalCrime & LegalArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NG
    NORTH GEORGIA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $123k · revenue +20%
  • JH
    Joy House Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +0%
  • GC
    GILMER CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • PH
    Project Heal Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +44%
  • FR
    FOSTERING ROOTS OF ELLIJAY
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • AC
    ANGELS CHOICE HAVEN
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Camp Grace

Create faith-filled environment for chil

Youth Development
2
Wilmore Day Care Center

At Wilmore Day Care Center, it is our mission to provide holistic care for your child within a loving, Christian environment. We strive to ensure a well-rounded educational experience that will encourage lifelong learning.

—
3
Victory Christian Academy

The mission of victory christian academy, in partnership with christian parents, is to provide a loving, christ-centered environment of educational excellence so that the students may develop their gifts, knowledge, skills and energies to…

Education
4
New Life Christian School

New life christian school is dedicated to providing an education of excellence. the measure of success for students is not held purely in their considerable and notable academic achievements but rather as the school realizes its…

Education
5
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
6
Child Evangelism Fellowship of Delaware Inc

Evangelism of children by the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.

—
7
Holy City Christian Academy

Educational programs

Education
8
The Grace Foundation for the Appalachian
Arts & Culture
9
Ochoco Christian Conference Center
Religion
10
Divine Healing Ministries of Ga

It is a ministry of God focused on teaching the Word of God to the people.

Health
11
Lifeforce Christian Foundation

Teen arts mentorship program

Philanthropy
12
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Georgia Christian Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gilmer Arts & Heritage Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH GEORGIA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $122,875 · EducationNORTH GEORGIA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC+1 more: $2,000 · EducationCOVENANT COMMUNITY CHURCH: $21,800 · OtherCOVENANT COMMUNITY CHUR…CHURCH OF GOD WORLD MISSIONS: $6,000 · OtherCHURCH OF GOD WORLD MIS…FOSTERING ROOTS OF ELLIJAY: $4,000 · OtherFOSTERING ROOTS OF ELLI…ANGELS CHOICE HAVEN: $3,500 · OtherANGELS CHOICE HAVENNORTH GEORGIA PREGNANCY CENTER: $2,000 · Other+8 more: $3,600 · Other+8 moreNORTH GEORGIA CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $16,867 · Community ImprovementNORTH GEO…Project Heal Foundation Inc: $10,000 · InternationalJoy House Inc: $2,000 · Crime & LegalGILMER ARTS & HERITAGE ASSOCIATION: $1,250 · Arts & CultureYOUNG LIFE: $500 · Youth DevelopmentThe Craddock Center Inc: $250 · Human Services
Education$124,875Other$40,900Community Improvement$16,867International$10,000Crime & Legal$2,000Arts & Culture$1,250Youth Development$500Human Services$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH GEORGIA CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $16,867 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetProject Heal Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetJoy House Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGILMER CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Craddock Center Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH GEORGIA CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH GEORGIA CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Heal Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Joy House Inc ↗
  • Who funds GILMER CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GILMER ARTS & HERITAGE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds The Craddock Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Whitepath Fabtech Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Whitepath Fabtech Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Whitepath Fabtech Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Whitepath Fabtech Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Whitepath Fabtech’s filings →

    More from the funding graph