Skip to content

· Private foundation

White Lily Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$96k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$44kCivil Rights$41kEducation$35kEnvironment$35kPublic Benefit$29kCrime & Legal$24kHousing & Shelter$20kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
$16,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$659k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$16,000
MASSACHUSETTS HOUSING AND SHELTER ALLIAN$16,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE$16,000
Rape Abuse And Incest National$16,000
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC -$16,000
MOVEMENT VOTER FUND$7,500
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS$3,000
WILLIAM J BRENNAN JR CENTER FOR JUSTICE$2,500
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC$2,000
WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MASSACHUSETTS HOUSING AND SHELTER ALLIAN: $16k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
MD
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$235k · 22 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
7

Total granted

$235k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+3%

Still filing today

55%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsCivil RightsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue +28%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    5× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +121%
  • MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • WHEATON COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +27%
  • BS
    BOSTONIAN SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -12%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
Massachusetts Business Roundtable Inc

The mission of the roundtable is to make massachusetts the most desirable place to live, work and do business by engaging private sector executives and public leaders to ensure access to a robust, diverse and talented workforce that…

—
4
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
5
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
6
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
8
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
9
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
12
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wgbh Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE: $29,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUEAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $28,500 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONRape Abuse And Incest National: $21,000 · OtherRape Abuse And Incest NationalLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS: $18,500 · OtherLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERSFOOD GATHERERS: $10,000 · OtherFOOD GATHERERSIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $9,600 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASS AMHERST: $7,500 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $7,500 · OtherREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $10,000 · OtherREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICESMOVEMENT VOTER FUND: $7,500 · Other+11 more: $24,500 · Other+11 moreWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $17,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLI…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $17,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTA…WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $15,000 · EducationWILLIAM J…WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA…WHEATON COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationWHEATON C…MASSACHUSETTS HOUSING & SHELTER ALLIANCE: $16,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $16,000 · InternationalTIDES FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyTHE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,500 · Animals
Other$184,100Environment$34,500Education$26,000Human Services$18,000International$16,000Philanthropy$16,000Animals$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS HOUSING & SHELTER ALLIANCE: $16,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $9,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWHEATON COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTERS INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $3,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI MARYLAND INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAYS TO HOUSING - PA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS HOUSING & SHELTER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MOVEMENT VOTER FUND ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEATON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BOSTONIAN SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAYS TO HOUSING - PA ↗
  • Who funds COLE RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH8.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization White Lily Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from White Lily Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Newton Community Service Centers Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Wheaton College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on White Lily’s filings →

More from the funding graph