· Private foundation
White Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DAVID R WHITE FAMILY SCHOLARSHIP | $21,500 |
| LAKE GEORGE SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCATION | $10,000 |
| LAKE GEORGE ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| STENO INSTITUTE FOR FAITH & SCIENCE | $10,000 |
| THE ALBANY ACADEMIES | $7,500 |
| THE UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION | $7,000 |
| CLINTON CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | $5,000 |
| SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $2,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 23% of White Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 67%.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TLThe Lake George Association Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $73k · revenue +22%
- UAUNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $21k · revenue +33%
- LGLake George Land Conservancy Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- MHMOHAWK HUDSON LAND CONSERVANCYgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +221%
- CTCAPITAL TRAIL ALLIANCEone grant, 2024 · $15k
- TLTHE LAKE GEORGE CLUB HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -80%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Adk is the only non-profit organization in new york state dedicated to the conservation, preservation, and responsible recreational use of the new york state forest preserve and other parks, wild lands, and waters vital to our members and…
The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…
The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…
To create memorable guest experiences which promote actions to help save species, habitats, and the communities who share those same landscapes
The central new york land trust seeks to preserve and protect natural areas in order to provide our communities clean water, clean air, wildlife habitat, and a chance to connect with the land.
See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…
Genesee Land Trust preserves and protects natural lands and waterways that enhance the quality of life in the Greater Rochester region - providing wildlife habitat, locally grown food, and connections to nature.
Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…
See schedule onylcvef's mission is to educate, engage and empower new yorkers to be effective advocates on behalf of the environment from clean energy and funding for parks, to solid waste and green buildings. first, we educate new yorkers…
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
Support regional economic development in new york's 14 northernmost counties
Conservation of lyme's natural, scenic and historic land & water resources.
How this is measured
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Lake George Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MOHAWK HUDSON LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Lake George Land Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LAKE GEORGE CLUB HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALBANY ACADEMIES INC ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM CHILDRENS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds UPPER HUDSON PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · Keeler Motor Car Company Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Bender Family Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization White Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from White Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation: 2% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to White Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to White Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on White Family’s filings →