Skip to content

· Private foundation

Whiskey River Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$212kPublic Safety & Disaster$74kRecreation & Sports$50kHealth$23kReligion$17kPublic Benefit$11kHousing & Shelter$6kPhilanthropy$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
$529
Median grant
14
States reached
$636k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Teton County Search & Rescue$30,000
Denison University$15,000
Deerfield Academy$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Becoming Jackson Whole$5,000
SS Faith Hope & Charity$1,200
Southern Methodist University$1,100
Misericordia$1,036
Friends of Bridger Teton Avalanche Center$1,033
Chileno Bay Foundation$1,000
Individual grant recipient$875
Partnership to End Addiction$529
National Alliance on Mental Illness$525
Friends of Pathways$517
Knights of The Round Table$515
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Knights of The Round Table: $515 → 11%Inspiration Corporation: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$381k · 38 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
86

Total granted

$381k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+26%

Still filing today

47%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DENISON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +39%
  • MU
    Marquette University
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +14%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • II
    INGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +12%
  • CF
    CANCER FOR COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
6
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
7
Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy

The parker institute for cancer immunotherapy's (pici) mission is to accelerate the development of breakthrough immune therapies to turn all cancers into curable diseases.

Health
8
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
9
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
12
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership to End Addiction; the most unlike its peers is Knights of the Round Table Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 137 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/61
Grantees still filing
50/61
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Teton County Search & Rescue: $69,935 · OtherTeton County Search & RescueChicago Mission: $30,500 · OtherChicago MissionIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSS Faith Hope & Charity Parish: $13,854 · OtherSS Faith Hope & Charity ParishIndividual grant recipient: $11,039 · OtherNew Trier District 203 Education Fdn: $9,200 · Other+88 more: $74,676 · Other+88 moreDENISON UNIVERSITY: $90,056 · EducationDENISON UNIVERSITYMarquette University: $50,000 · EducationMarquette UniversityTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $38,092 · EducationTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMYIndian Hill Club Scholarship Foundation: $7,500 · Education+8 more: $3,600 · EducationCANCER FOR COLLEGE: $5,000 · HealthNAMI National: $4,363 · HealthDANNY DID FOUNDATION: $1,030 · HealthTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthGLIOBLASTOMA FOUNDATION INC: $750 · HealthPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $529 · Health+9 more: $3,067 · HealthBecoming Jackson Whole: $11,039 · Public Benefit+1 more: $258 · Public BenefitNorthwestern University: $5,600 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF PATHWAYS: $4,595 · Recreation & SportsMETROSQUASH NFP: $500 · Recreation & SportsPACIFIC ROWING CLUB: $500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $100 · Recreation & SportsINGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO: $5,213 · Arts & CultureOne-Revolution Foundation: $1,750 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $250 · Arts & CultureCHILENO BAY FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 · PhilanthropyPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $1,552 · PhilanthropyEL DORADO FOUNDATION INC: $500 · PhilanthropyTHE KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION INC: $258 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $200 · Philanthropy
Other$234,204Education$189,248Health$15,739Public Benefit$11,297Recreation & Sports$11,295Arts & Culture$7,463Philanthropy$5,260

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $90,056 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $38,092 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBecoming Jackson Whole: $11,039 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetIndian Hill Club Scholarship Foundation: $7,500 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $5,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO: $5,213 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCANCER FOR COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF PATHWAYS: $4,595 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNAMI National: $4,363 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $3,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILENO BAY FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOne-Revolution Foundation: $1,750 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $1,552 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCODE PLATOON NFP: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE IGNITES CHICAGO: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANNY DID FOUNDATION: $1,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInspiration Corporation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINNETKA HOCKEY CLUB INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOTTOM LINE INC: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLIOBLASTOMA FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFREE ARTS FOR ABUSED CHILDREN OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $536 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $529 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKNIGHTS OF THE ROUND TABLE INC: $515 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $507 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthern Rockies Conservation Cooperative: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROSQUASH NFP: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC ROWING CLUB: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEL DORADO FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of GALA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN BOOKS LTD: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH: $267 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $263 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION INC: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlueprints for Pangaea: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESERVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA JUST HARVEST: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Becoming Jackson Whole ↗
  • Who funds Indian Hill Club Scholarship Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds INGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CANCER FOR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PATHWAYS ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA ↗
  • Who funds CHILENO BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds One-Revolution Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds CODE PLATOON NFP ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds DANNY DID FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Inspiration Corporation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL17.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Loeb Family Foundation Inc · The Seabury Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Helen V Brach Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · McKesson Foundation Inc · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Whiskey River Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Whiskey River Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Bottom Line Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Whiskey River Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Whiskey River Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 137 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Whiskey River’s filings →

More from the funding graph