Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Wgg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2024
8
Organizations funded FY2023
13%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$5,000
Organizations funded a year
8 to 24
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$436k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 13% of the organizations Wgg Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 25% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving5$10k0%
FY20238$10k13%
FY202211$42k36%
FY202124$101kn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$59kReligion$25kFood & Nutrition$17kHousing & Shelter$16kArts & Culture$13kEducation$10kInternational$9kHealth$6kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 20 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($39k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Wgg Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthside Intercommunity Agency Inc: $40,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetMeals on Wheels: $11,400 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetLewisville Education Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetChristian Community Action: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetInt'L Treasure House Ministries: $8,650 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetDaystar Life Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLaboratory Theater of Florida Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCenter for Transforming Lives: $3,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Community Centers Inc: $3,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Presbyterian Night Shelter of Tarrant County: $3,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWestaid: $3,400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOperation Kindness: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSt Petersburg Free Clinic Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDay Resource Center for Homeless: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSelah Freedom Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetParc Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSalvador Dali Museum Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVoice for Children Inc AKA Voices for Children of Florida: $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMethodist Justice Ministry of Fumc: $1,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · The Morris Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply Fund · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · The Ninnie L Baird Foundation · Ken W Davis Foundation · Rainwater Charitable Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Wgg Foundation with peer funders

About Wgg Foundation

How much does Wgg Foundation give?
Wgg Foundation reported 5 grants totaling $9,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 24 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does Wgg Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2024, its largest causes are Human Services (36%), Religion (15%), Food & Nutrition (11%).
Who are Wgg Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2024: Northside Intercommunity Agency Inc ($41k), Meals on Wheels ($11k), Lewisville Education Foundation Inc ($10k).
Does Wgg Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 13% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Wgg Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Wgg Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax, The Morris Foundation, Amon G Carter Foundation.
Where is Wgg Foundation based?
Wgg Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wgg’s filings →

More from the funding graph